The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 02:21, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

African Unification Front[edit]

African Unification Front (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

They exist, but I wasn't coninced that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG (lathough it seems like something which should be notable). Has been tagged for notability for over 7 years; hopefully we can now resolve it. Sending WP:APPNOTE to KrakatoaKatie, Optim, Tameamseo. Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The organisation's website is not linked in the article, it is this one. They claimed "millions of supporters". From the website it looks as if the organisation ceased around 2003/2004. A number of references found in books: mostly list entries and citations of the AUF's publications, but there is also "The idea of creating the AU [ African Union ] was revived in the mid-1990s as a result of the efforts of the African Unification Front." Telò (ed.), Professor Mario (2014). Globalisation, Multilateralism, Europe: Towards a Better Global Governance?. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. Section 2.1. ISBN 9781472405388. ((cite book)): |last1= has generic name (help) It appears to have had important influence in its time: Noyster (talk), 11:13, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. While most searches return little, as Noyster points out, a search on Books returns quite a few credible sources. The article definitely needs work, however. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.