The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, after discounting IPs (whose arguments do not relate to Wikipedia policy anyway). --Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This film lacks notability and fails WP:NOTFILM. A google search [1] returns 256 hits, none which are independent, reliable sources that can be used to source this article. --Aude (talk) 19:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, not even an IMDB article. Vectro 06:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, This movie is pretty well-known on the experimental / underground movie circuit. Is something not worth keeping because it doesn't have somebody famous in it and isn't a big Hollywood blockbuster? I don't get the problem here. User:Movie Lover 15:36, 21 October 2006 Comment added by 24.199.110.171 (talk · contribs)
• Weak Delete One source of notabile coverage (Film Threat) given, but generally multiple sources are required for inclusion. Eluchil404 21:21, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, It is listed in IMDB and has played around the world. User:Gary Gary Gary Gary 16:59, 23 October 2006 Comment added by 38.98.97.226 (talk · contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.