The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article on the album "Ai no Uta" by the band Strawberry Flower does not verify notability. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ai no Uta (Album)

[edit]

Unreleased album (crystal ballism) with no references and little or no media coverage. Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:V. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 15:06, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 15:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:57, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Without checking, I smell some kind of a walled garden here. See Strawberry Flower and look at the singles section. The second and third were added after the first was also called the "only" at inception. Sales are within 10 copies of each other (and 100,000) for all 3? The second consists of remixes of the first? The album is based on the single released seven years before? Dekimasu よ! 07:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, walled gardens exist. Blast Ulna (talk) 08:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I should note that there is a different, notable album called "Ai no Uta" which is currently on some sales charts in Japan. A deletion here should not be held against recreation of a different article at this title. Dekimasu よ! 01:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.