The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect (NAC) Rotten regard Softnow 00:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ainsley Bailey[edit]

Ainsley Bailey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable actor. Fails WP:NACTORS. Has had no significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Has one recurring role in a current TV series. Has no large fan base or a significant "cult" following. Has made no unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment. Fails WP:GNG as has received no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, Geraldo Perez (talk) 05:57, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 00:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.