The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Already speedy deleted following creator's blanking.  Sandstein  16:10, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Thomas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's a claim to notability with the development of the "world's first concrete based floating solar power plant", however this notability does not seem to be able to be verified, as I'm unable to locate sources for verification. Also, the only hit that "Ajay Thomas" receives is this: [1], which does not refer to the subject of this article. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:35, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - this is my provisional assessment because I do not see the need for the rush for deletion only hours after the article was created. It is incorrect to say that "the only hit that "Ajay Thomas" receives is this: ....". A quick search has produced this from the Times of India and this from The Hindu two of the most respected papers in the region. There are a number of other sources. We can discuss whether an article on his project might be better than an article on him but outright deletion is premature and not justified. Just Chilling (talk) 18:50, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as clear case of WP:TOSOON. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:13, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not enough reliable independent coverage to satisfy WP:BLP. In addition, based on the history of this article and Vatsaa Energy Private Limited, it seems to be a clear COI case. Beagel (talk) 10:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the author blanked the page by this edit, it should be speedy deleted per G7. Beagel (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as by far nothing at all close for his own independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- an executive in a non-notable company; fails GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.