The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 07:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian exodus[edit]

Albanian exodus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Term is non-existant in the literature and appears completely made up by the article creator. The article is nothing more than a collection of disparate events that are completely unconnected and appears to exist solely for national POV purposes. --Athenean (talk) 20:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: It is obvious that this term has nothing to do with what is written inside the article, for example in google books if we search: "Albanian exodus"+Chams [[1]] or "Albanian exodus"+Chameria [[2]], the results are zero.Alexikoua (talk) 20:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – even if the term could be sourced as having been used occasionally for each of the half dozen unrelated historical situations treated in this article, combining them into a single article would still constitute illegitimate OR – a classical WP:SYNTH case. The act of spinning these historical episodes into a single historical "thread" is precisely the kind of "novel narrative" that our WP:OR policy is meant to prevent. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.