The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:16, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Albi the Squirrel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whilst the articles subject has had mentions in several news articles, I do not believe it warrants an article of its own as it is not suitable content for an article. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 21:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unencyclopaedic content. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Wikipedia is neither a memorial nor a news site. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 18:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A lot more coverage than your average squirrel, but not enough to overcome WP:NOTNEWS. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Albinos are unusual but not exceptional. WP:NOTNEWS. Peterkingiron (talk) 19:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.