The result was delete. Note: After discounting WP:SPAs by weighting together as one, consensus is for deletion. Cirt (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable filmmaker, whose article on Wikipedia qualifies as Wikipedia:Autobiography since it was written by himself and his wife. Plus there are no sources for this article besides his own website and IMDb. --bender235 (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
notability: yes.
Wasiliy (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
principle debate question: The IMDB is the central data base for the filmbusiness worldwide. Like national-libraries for print publications, IMDB is an official register for movies that without exception have to be either aired to the public by national tv-channels , or were shown in the movies by listed film-distributors or screened at notable filmfestifals. At least - if standing not alone, added with (not always english) secondary sources those should reach notability status. just look at many wiki articles about for example french, italian or russian filmmakers...
Filmbuster (talk) 11:49, 31 January 2010 (UTC) — Filmbuster (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
2. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique.
3. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
4. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.