- Alim Industries Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG, Broken link and companies website is used as ref. M.parvage (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this company, while small, appears to be a significant participant in the market for domestically produced agricultural machinery in Bangladesh. The company gets regular coverage in the Daily Star and has been mentioned in more than one scholarly article about agricultural mechanization. I've added a bit to the article. It's a bit thin, but considering the limited scope of the article there is enough out there to support the text and to meet notability.
- The nominator doesn't say what the broken link is, but it appears to be the gonews24.com cite which (based on Google translate) appears to be unrelated to this company. If someone with local language capability wants to delete it that would be welcome. As to the question of citing the company website, there's nothing wrong with using a primary source, although it's not preferred, if notability is shown through secondary sources.
- I would encourage @M.parvage to familiarize himself with WP:BEFORE before making further nominations for AfD. I found a number of sources easily, and there are others out there. AfD nomination should be based on availability of sources not the current state of sourcing. Oblivy (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- See:
- The article can't be fixed through normal editing, As it has no WP:SIGCOV.
- The article isn't created recently.
- So,accroding to the guidelines of WP:BEFORE, This article meets Wikipedia deletion policy.
- Also,
- In terms of your point: significant participant in the market, is or may be a word of mouth. None of the souces are represent it M.parvage (talk) 04:57, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]