The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per unanimity of responses (non-admin closure). Skomorokh 00:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aliso village housing projects (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

no citations to secondary sources or assertion of notability? Oo7565 (talk) 01:09, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep appears to have been the subject of a 5,000 word piece in the LA Times [1], 20 other sources on Google News Archive [2], 250 for "Aliso Village" on GNA. 155 results on Google Books. Plenty of sources. --Rividian (talk) 02:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep --intrinsic historical importance, and also the sources to show it. A careless nomination without attempting even to look for the most obvious sources. DGG (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A notable historical housing project. Many non-trivial hits on both g-scholar and g-books. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 01:42, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.