The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Agree with Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth - there are BLP concerns, so a speedy delete is justifiable. Incidentally, the other similar articles could probably be speedied as well. PhilKnight (talk) 19:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alli Muhammad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Was originally PRODed with "Nothing indicating WP:BIO, and Google turns up so little that I think this is just a vanity article." Was also PROD2. No reason given for dePRODing. Article is part of a nasty walled garden of bad articles (unreferenced, POV, not-notable, possibly defamatory). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global white extermination. DanielRigal (talk) 20:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable --  Chzz  ►  20:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not notable (per my earlier prod). Itsmejudith (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per my PROD2... - Adolphus79 (talk) 23:21, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete = The article is unreferenced and the related articles about the Revolutionary Black Panther Party and its beliefs claim an extremely racist and violent philosophy. This needs to be deleted immediately as an unreferenced negative BLP, as do the related articles. Flopsy Mopsy and Cottonmouth (talk) 19:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.