The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. A rough consensus was reached that the subject's awards and 3rd party references were not sufficiently substantial to warrant an article. Xymmax ^{So let it be written} _{So let it be done} 03:41, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Allyson Parsons[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Marked for notability since September 2021. No major awards or recognition to meet WP:ARTIST. Hardly any article links to this. LibStar (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women, Visual arts, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:GNG. Certainly the 7:30 Report reference meets RSS, as does The Canberra Times. Awards are small, but all in all, content that reaches significance bar. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 23:21, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Canberra Times article is a 1 line mention and not WP:SIGCOV. I'm unable to verify if the 7.30 report is indepth coverage. LibStar (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, seems to be plenty of varied references. The number of links to the page (see nom) should not be a criteria for deletion. And per above, the content adds up to a notable and sourced article. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how she meets WP:ARTIST. Her awards are very minor from the town of Victor Harbor, South Australia which has a population of 5200, and many of the sources relate to these awards. LibStar (talk) 04:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
5 of the 7 sources are from Victor Harbor Times which is hardly a major news source in Australia. LibStar (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Here is an archive of the 7.30 source. It's essentially an interview with friends and family members. The other sources are passing mentions of local awards. The closest we get to critical analysis of her works and influence, such as they are, is this quote from 7.30: Allyson sits there as a contributor to that dialogue, adding her vision to the way we see our country. Not enough to meet WP:NARTIST. Jfire (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 2010 finalist for the Gallipoli Art Prize. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 07:07, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 21:03, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't see this person listed in the Getty ULAN, or find any mentions of her collections in museums. This is about all I find [1], which is really just for a local fundraiser. No sources found. Oaktree b (talk) 00:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Coverage is not sufficient for GNG, and other criteria for NARTIST are not met either.

JoelleJay (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.