This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: the Arab–Israeli conflict post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people Eastern Europe or the Balkans They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Archive 1

Regarding Herman op den Graeff May be you should try a google book search (since if you do a regular search only the nonsense produced by family members turns up). you will find that the only facts on the wiki article are that a guy called Herman up den Graeff was a Mennonite immigrant from Germany. Anything else (plantagenet, de Graeff-link to the Netherlands, Holy Grail) is COMPLETE NONSENSE. if any of the claims made (obviously made by family members) on the wiki page were true, don't you think that such an important person (remember, he was allegedly a "guardian of the Holy grail") would be mentioned extensively in historic literature on google books; obviously this is not the case. F.ex. he claim that he was a descendent of the De Graeff family in Amsterdam or a descendent of House of Cleves is plain B*llsht*t. Check Nederland's Adelsboek, Europäische Stammtalfen etc. Hence i think it's better to let the public decide; that's why i suggested that the page should be deleted.

many thanks for your support of this page and excellent contributions, and also for cleaning up my referencing. I have taken note and will be more thorough in future. very much appreciated. Doctor 17 (talk) 01:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Happy to collaborate! I hope the article is kept at AfD. The notability guidelines for organizations sometimes do Wikipedia a disservice by enabling editors to exclude useful encyclopedic content about notable nonprofits and CSOs under rules that are intended to keep out commercial spam. Jfire (talk) 01:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM)) to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, given your involvement in the previous AfD on the same article; could you please have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Adidas sponsorships? Kind regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 13:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Jfire, why are the designers of the wedding dress of princess Eugenie not clickable on the article? Would you be able to help to change this please? 2077PP (talk) 21:48, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Congrats for entering List of Wikipedians by number of edits/5001–10000! Keep up your rapid but constructive edits! Timothytyy (talk) 08:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! Jfire (talk) 16:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]