![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Jfire, on Nelson Chan and Tales of the Baroness, the two have been reviewed, and I hope the new info will suffice, if not, I would be more than happy to add on to the two stubs. I'm still reletavily new to all this wikipedia thing, and would much apprichiate your assitance.
Thanks again. Jan 21 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NC7285069 (talk • contribs) 21:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Jfire, on Shane Ellison article you have placed "citations needed" flag without flagging any specific words, sentences or phrases which would require citations. Also, focus is no longer on biography (as evidenced by removal of Biography heading), but is now on notability as author and expert on pharmaceutical drug design/biochemistry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.240.241.197 (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for looking after Bjørnøya, my former pet article was certainly in need of that type of improvement. Are you new to Wikipedia? Would be great to see more of your work! Merry Christmas and best wishes, Kosebamse (talk) 14:25, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your exemplary handling of the Deletion discussion on James W. Sire NBeale (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 12:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Please don't and why would you, its not like I lied about what happened, if anything, can we possibly work together to add info to the page and help expand it. It will not always look like this, you know.
Thank You, Signshare December 27, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Signshare (talk • contribs) 16:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
relax man¡¡...The page is "under construction"...I guess I take some days to make something good. be pattient --Maestrotaku (talk) 16:49, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Bilawal Bhutto Zardari.--JamesDS (talk) 01:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Mr fire,
right then. i have studied these and i believe my article met the criteria. not everything on Wikipedia is a totally 100% verifiable, if you deny that you are kidding yourself. i believe it is fairly notable, more so than many things on this site,and how would one judge that anyway? have you never been greeted with the Manhug? it would surprise me if you have not been. as for verifiability, you can see it on the street, often when two guys meet, such as after a long separation, or if they are family, something along the lines of a Manhug is exchanged. perhaps the name is not entirely "politically correct" but if that was your only problem with it there should have been no argument. as for reliable sources, i must go again to common sense. have you never been greeted this way? or seen hundreds of others greet each other with the Manhug? i sincerely doubt it. there is no concrete evidence that Homer existed, and yet you allow a Wikipedia article on him. so i must ask: why did you delete this page? if you doubt the existence of the Manhug go try it on someone and they will inevitably return it without missing a beat. i see from your talk page that you are into deleting things. i also enjoy the fact that you not only marked my article, but marked it for immediate deletion, therby giving it no fair chance. i find this unsporting.
i do apologize for my manner, it shall not happen again.
P.S. since i believe that the manhug was a ligitimate article perhaps i shall re-create it. thank you for the advice!
Fag an Ballach
Rockpiper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockpiper (talk • contribs)
Hey, do you think Isla de Tagomago passes WP:N? It has an article on the Spanish Wikipedia, anyway.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 04:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I think you jumped the gun on tagging FreeCreditReport.com for deletion. In the United States this is a very well known site. I see that you are new to the site, I ask that you take a little bit of time exploring a page on New Page Patrol, maybe google search it, before tagging it for speedy deletion. thanks.--CastAStone//(talk) 05:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Deletion of Tim De Groot, artist and musician from Grand Rapids, MI I believe that you are in error of recommending this man for deletion, although not nationally known, in the GR area he is quite well known. He is personal friends with no less than three of the individuals who are also listed under the same heading; Mark Hekman, Paul Collins and Richard DeVos. Incidentally, Tim attended the Kendall School of Art and Design with Maynard James Keenan, yet Maynard is listed under Grand Rapids; and Maynard to this day doesn't acknowledge ever being from Grand Rapids. To keep in the tradition that Wikipedia is supposed to be about, research. Those researching Grand Rapids ought to know about Tim De Groot. This in NOT a vanity posting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KingSethos (talk • contribs) 01:36, 30 December 2007
It appears to be fixed nevermind
sderenzi 71.201.135.173 (talk) 09:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
nevermind
Mr Kwesi Amoafo-Yeboah is one of the brain behind the introduction of the Western Union money transfer service in Ghana and West Africa. He is the chairman and founder of i-Tel Ghana Limited and the chairman of Telligent Wireless Limited, 2 reputable telecommunications companies in Ghana. Mr Kwesi Amoafo-Yeboah is an independent candidate for the 2008 Presidential Elections in Ghana. Maybe he deserves a page on wikipedia.org
Thanks for reconsidering his article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yamentoulionnel (talk • contribs) 11:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, A Ticket for Perpetual Locomotion, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Ticket for Perpetual Locomotion. Thank you. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 22:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
I see you have removed the hangon tag from Annie Leonard. You indicated this as no one nominated it for deletion. Perhaps you didn't see where it was deleted twice today, within mere minutes of creating and in the middle of editing the article? Sometimes I think some wikipedia editors are much, much too quick with the mop. Bstone (talk) 18:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
I'll go over the edits and revert if I was wrong. HalfShadow (talk) 04:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Just to let you know that the same user has recreated the page post deletion. Harry was a white dog with black spots (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Money as Debt I have explained why Money as Debt is notable. You may check the reference if you please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hsriniva
Notability guideline on Wikipedia. " It is a generally accepted standard that all editors should follow. However, it is not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception. When editing this page, ensure that your revision reflects consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page.". The article has been deleted. It was about an open educational documentary. It is a pity it has been deleted. I would recommend you try to watch it and may be add an article of your own. (talk • contribs) 19:49, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
I added some newspaper articles as references to Child Health International. --Eastmain (talk) 04:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Uh looks like I still messed up the nomination somehow. There was already a response on the page when I got there but I think it has been updated by now. Let me know if I still need to fix anything. Thanks. Spatulacity (talk) 20:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Callelinea has re-added his bogus references to Dexter Lehtinen. Corvus cornixtalk 07:20, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello JFire... I don't know who you are, you do not know who I am, but it seems you know nothing about Joseph Giardina, Maria Callas and dozen of other world famous singers... ALT/STOP!! Since someone else before you (or maybe it had been you in disguise!...:-)...) had tagged Joseph Giardina's biography saying it needed references/citations, I wasted some of my time and put a couple, including the one of Salem College... where he is mentioned as one of the most famous vocal trainers living in Italy... I also put some links to rare photos of Joseph Giardina... just to show what this little GREAT man looks like... You know, there are people who, in their field, are famous all other the world, but you will not find one single link with their name and surname on the world wide web... My father for example set up companies that deal with 60% of the total world production in that field, with offices and warehouses in Taiwan, Moscow, South Africa, Europe etc. and you won't find any reference to him on one single page of the WWW world wide web. I hope that someone doesn't tag the Rolls Royce page saying it needs citations or that it seems to be noticeable but has no references... PS: I live in Rome, where Joseph Giardina lives... and I obviously know him "in carne e ossa" (personally), as a human being and as master and director of choirs I have been in for years. Ciao da Roma, Jwadeinthewater —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.25.196.78 (talk) 13:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Can you lend a hand here? You and I have both asked him to quit removing the notability tags, but he seems resistant. I can't find policy that says 'don't' but I think we both disagree with them being removed for the same reaosns. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 21:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Do you have a tutorial somewhere on the way you consolidated the refs for Curtis Harris? It looks so much cleaner, but I'm not sure I follow exactly. I use either the downloadable "Wikicite" (which generates somewhat cleaner citations in that it does the 1 abc for multiple citations to the same reference) or this tool (which makes a mess!) to do my citations since I haven't memorised the codes yet. Thanks! Travellingcari (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Whoops I wasn't signed in, sorry about that Travellingcari (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Glad I could be of help!. --Montchav (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Saracino, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Saracino is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Saracino, please affix the template ((hangon)) to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Only after I was able to source some information about this website (the majority of the peacock has been plucked by the time I found it) did I see that you'd speedied it. The speedy was apparently reverted but I'm not sure if you still think it merits deletion. I'm not attached to it, I just found some coverage and added it so it would be sourced while it existed here. Let me know if you want me to take it to AfD. Travellingcari (talk) 16:05, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Damn, I edit conflict trying to add Devlinvideo to the username board, and then you go and remove it! :) Corvus cornixtalk 03:49, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Please do not delete it. He's a winner of one of the highest awards in Vocal Classical Music in India, the Sangeet Natak Academi Award in 2005. I am building this page now and am also citing refernces to articles and sources. Thanks. Anupa4 (talk) 04:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Anupa4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupa4 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Im sorry, What exactly did I Mess Up On? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redraven20 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Redraven20 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Redraven20 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Carlo Suarez wrote THE CYPHER OF GENESIS and explained how the Aleph-Tav(in which Torah is embodied) were Hieroglyphs, not mystical writings. He termed the writing system "cabala." Why is it considered "inappropriate" to add a page that says this? I suspect a cabal to hide the Hieroglyphic nature of Torah. The New Testament describes the effort to keep Torah esoteric. "Why are you speaking of these things and you are not yet 50"(Pharisees to Jesus) I don't feel that you are conscious of the cabal and being used. Please consider referring me to one of my sentences found incomprehensible. Please let me know how you came to be credited with the deletion and warning. How can I get a page to word-wrap? I'll add it to "Help" and "Formatting." Intrigued, John ShoemakerJohnshoemaker (talk) 04:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Johnshoemaker (talk) 03:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnshoemaker (talk • contribs) 03:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Jfire, Possibly you have not referred me to an incomprehensible sentence in my article because you don't have it. There certainly wasn't enough time for you to have read any of it before the instant deletion. I'll include it here unless you ask that I not.Johnshoemaker (talk) 05:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. I saw you prodded Baron von Lemon. Whilst I agree that this is a minor character from long back who probably doesn't meet the notability guidelines, I tend to think that this kind of article - about the obscure stuff - is part of what makes Wikipedia great. It's not promoting anybody, it's not self-aggrandisement, and somebody might just find it useful or interesting. Can I ask you to reconsider? If not, can I get you to take it to AfD? Thanks, Chris (talk) 08:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :) Chris (talk) 20:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jfire, I noticed you redirected an article about a television character[1] (and I personally think that article was in very poor shape), but I am letting you know that there is currently a temporary injunction that applies to all editors[2] while this arbitration case is open. The injunction was enacted on February 3, 2008 and it reads:
"For the duration of this case, no editor shall redirect or delete any currently existing article regarding a television series episode or character; nor un-redirect or un-delete any currently redirected or deleted article on such a topic, nor apply or remove a tag related to notability to such an article. Administrators are authorized to revert such changes on sight, and to block any editors that persist in making them after being warned of this injunction."
The arbitration committee would like all editors to hold off on such actions while the case is open. I will also notify you when the injunction ends. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 08:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Richard Alan Fox, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((dated prod))
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add ((db-author))
to the top of Richard Alan Fox. Deb (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hey, the reason why there are no links to other websites about this is because the religion has just started, we are working on making a web page, please do not take down our current information, we are currently trying to get people aware of our religion and spread the word. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brasker (talk • contribs) 06:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes, but wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and whether or not my religion has a web page on the internet or not, does not make it any less of a religion, and the fact that it does exist, I believe warrants it to be on wikipedia. I find the fact that you are trying to remove my religious beliefs from the internet, not only insulting, but also bigoted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brasker (talk • contribs) 08:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I emailed you the articles seconds ago. In the past, I've found the Wikipedia email feature a bit slow. I'd be interested in finding out when you received them. Noroton (talk) 03:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
I wasn't sure whether that would qualify as speedy since he asserts some notability and some admins are quick on the 'he exists, he's notable' button so I figured AfD might be inevitable. Travellingcari (talk) 04:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
FYI, I have indefblocked VampKing as an admitted sockpuppet of blocked user Jonathon The Impaler. -- But|seriously|folks 05:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the redirect/merge. I'd actually anticipated it being controversial so tagged it rather than doing it, and then entirely forgot about it o:) TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Just a friendly note on the prod for Tim Kinsella that you contested with an edit summary of "member of notable bands is notable per WP:MUSIC". What WP:MUSIC actually says is "Members of notable bands are not given individual articles unless they have demonstrated notability for activity independent of the band."--Fabrictramp (talk) 14:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your message [3] on my talk page. Disruptive edits such as this contributed to my block decision. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
If you are familiar with Web 2.0 can you take a look at these articles that I started in my sandboxs User_talk:Igorberger/21-november-2007-01-january-2008#SEO_Consultants. If you have time I would appreciate if you can join me in editing the articles to bring them to main space. You are welcome to just dig in my sandbox and do constructive edits. Some articles are detalied but need to establish notability, while others just have a little content on the subject and need extensive work. Thank you, Igor Berger (talk) 23:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Jfire, i have a question about Code momentum, (a term i was not aware about until you prodded it), its tagged Neologism, well the article itself is from 2003, hundreds of people must have been reading it and now 5 years later its not notable ? Let me express my opinion that i would like to find articles in this encyclopedia about what is not common used, he ! i learned something today about something not so common, so turning it around to delete articles with the argument, not common used is very strange, and last, the article is referenced, so please remove the prod from the article. Cheers. Mion (talk) 19:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Please do not write Charles as Charlie Dean's full name.
He was Christened "Charlie Adam Dean" not "Charles." —Preceding unsigned comment added by XxZaydenxx (talk • contribs) 20:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The arbitration committee have reached a decision in this arbitration case and the temporary injunction related to television episode articles and television character articles has now ended. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
It turns out, just from checking google, that Peter Zageris is in fact a famous artist. DGG (talk) 05:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Jfire ... please consider placing a ((Oldprodfull))
on Talk pages when you decline a PROD ... Happy Editing! — 72.75.110.142 (talk) 16:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Marin Creek, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marin Creek. Thank you. W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for those, any help with the mouth and source coordinates in the box?W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
what exactly is gill tract?W-i-k-i-l-o-v-e-r-1-7 (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
I have addressed your points as best I can in the ZHLT AfD, and would appreciate it if you took another look. Thanks. 98.203.237.75 (talk) 11:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for this. Can't believe I missed the double re-direct. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 04:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
at Kilkare Woods, California please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NewAtThis (talk • contribs) 00:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the catch, that saves me a lot of work. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 01:56, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Restored. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 07:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Number One with a Bullet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number One with a Bullet. Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 17:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Masada (Honorverse), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masada (Honorverse) (2nd nomination). Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 13:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Another editor has added the ((prod))
template to the article Manufacturing Execution System, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the ((prod))
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Trevor Steedman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Steedman. Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 10:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I see that you removed the prod template from this article. The reason I nominated it for deletion is because the area is already covered in the Withington article, and this one looks like a stub left over from a previous merge.
Will you restore the deletion template, or shall I take this to AfD? --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
An editor has nominated Manufacturing Execution System, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manufacturing Execution System and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 15:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I am Ben Stevens and it is not appropriate for you t list my children's name or where I reside. the reference to the "Alaska Fishing" rights are heresay and an article in a newspaper should not be valid reference for a living biography page. I am unaware of who orginally listed that garbage on my living biography but suspect it is politically motivated. remove it permanently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bostonb5 (talk • contribs) 22:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Just to let you know I've added a host of citations to Earthrise, including press releases and third-party news articles to address your concerns. I've also gone ahead and removed the prod tag. The article is really suffering from bloat and gameguide material and needs to be slimmed down a lot, which I'll try to work on over the next few weeks. Any questions, please let me know. Many thanks! Gazimoff (talk) 20:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Well I am happy to see that the outcome of the debate was to keep the page. I havn't logged into my Wikipedia account in quite awhile but I see alot has happened in way of discussion. As you stated I have given all the information on this webpage but it is definatly open to other people to add to it. I am still researching for more information and sources and when they are found they will be added. The Earls of Rosebery, also known as Lord Dalmeny bear the surname of Primrose and are well documented while the Lairds of Burnbrae, also from the Primrose family have very little documented about them. Sarajaynej (talk) 06:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I just added some more links, I'll add more details soon. I had removed articleissues before because it was ok with Toddst. I believe I've satisfied some of the issues - could you confirm - verifiable claim that he is the current Consul General of Pakistan in New York, enough sources of reference now, and a decent amount of articles now link to this as well. Leaving notability and Conflict of Interest. I was wondering if you could suggest ways I could achieve this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Razih (talk • contribs) 21:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
I have files a case against this user in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Firefly322. This users edits are becoming very problematic. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 14:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for looking into that for me! Nick Graves (talk) 21:36, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! But my Wikimood is actually ok, I just forgot to update the counter. But thanks for the vote of confidence and reminding me to change it ;) Weather in DC is awful today. I can't wait for May, I intend to go kayaking (and by kayaking I mean sit in a kayak and get drunk while the current floats me) on the Brandywine River: picture here. ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 22:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
But why wouldn't you also prod Lasagna code? -- Robocoder (t|c) 07:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I found some references for Lewis Center for Educational Research at http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Lewis+Center+for+Educational+Research%22 and added a few to the article. If you check the article history, you'll see that the text after the first bullet point was deleted by an IP user. --Eastmain (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
--BorgQueen (talk) 13:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for creating the Adolf Frey article. Could you please add a reference section to the article? --Eastmain (talk) 19:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
gossip protocol is so full of half-baked speculation "might" that I wonder if the professor wrote any of the code he is selling. routing is so clear and full of links to the way things are actually done, that it's a good starting point for understanding category:network architecture. How is it that you get more out of gossip protocol than routing? BrewJay (talk) 04:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Andrew Slattery, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Slattery. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Yumegusa (talk) 18:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
here. I wonder which sock that was. StarM 23:29, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
Backslash Forwardslash 17:46, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
sorry, wasn't sure how to do citations —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.3.128.3 (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nike sponsorships, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nike sponsorships. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 02:05, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi...I just wanted to thank you for adding the photo on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge page. That's an awesome pic! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grillo7 (talk • contribs) 08:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Why did you remove the prod template? --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I am going to restore the prod template, because this article contains incorrect information. If you are confused, please ask me on my talk page what you are confused about. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Oo. Thank you. It's just that I became all nervous when I saw that this article was really wrong. I am going to ask you to pitch in and help; Austell is located in Cobb County only - NOT Douglas county and Cobb. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
The Austell article is looking a little bare now that I've had to remove a lot of wrong information. --Marshall T. Williams (talk) 20:48, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you reverted my proposed deletion of Shawn Stuckey with the reasoning that having been an NFL player was sufficient reason to be notable--I disagree. For the following reasons I still argue and move to delete such entry:
According to notability standards, independent secondary sources provide the most objective evidence of notability. This article, even after multiple suggestions, still does not use a substantial number of entries that are secondary. A majority, more than 80% from the subjects own website. Which delves into "Independent of the subject" criteria excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases.
Having played in the NFL for one (1) year does not in itself qualify for notability. Given that the subject of this entry might have been notable when he broke an NFL record his rookie year, the fact of the matter is that the subject does not meet notability standards. Wikipedians pride ourselves in not becoming a Who's Who encyclopedia.
Notability is not static. I do agree that the subject's story is interesting and maybe in the future an entry should be written once notability standards are met. In the meantime, this entry must be deleted. Thank you. User: Creator1981
I read the "articles for deletion" page and thought I followed the exact steps required. What did I do wrong? This is regarding the deletion of "porn for the blind." You undid my edits and wrote "take it to afd" which I do not understand. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelatomato (talk • contribs) 17:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
On the programming anti-patterns page you've deleted pattern names with red links. Perhaps these should be left unlinked rather than removed? The pattern names and summaries which are still pertinent to the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.102.36 (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
SoWhy 15:29, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Jfire,
I've establshed communication with Pat Ament and have offered to help improve the article about him. I noticed you did a couple of edits and wanted to give you a "heads up". Clearly, the article needs work - references, and elimination of "cut and paste" material. Your input would be appreciated. Jim Heaphy (talk) 03:44, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I wanted to let you know that Tom Frost has signed an agreement allowing use of his climbing photos under the terms of the Creative Commons Atribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. I received a signed copy in today's mail, and sent a scan to Maggie Dennis in the permissions department at the Wikimedia Foundation. I am mailing her an original as well. He has authorized me to act as his agent in downloading, scanning and uploading photos, as he isn't a regular computer user. If there are specific Frost photos that you want uploaded, please let me know. I will be quite busy in the next few days, but I will do it as soon as possible. Jim Heaphy (talk) 02:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:44, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
I am currently considering creating an article titled "99 North (record label)" which would then redirect to Higher State and noticed your reference to nominating 99 North for deletion with reference to AnimalSense - just wondering whether you think it would be an idea to create a Disambiguation page for them both, since it has been now been merged with the reference section of Whistler Blackcomb and, if so, what you suggest as a description for the original 99 North to differentiate it from the record label - your thoughts...? (I have posted a message to User talk:Tikiwont asking for his input, as he merged the article, but I now notice he is on an editing break. Hudson702 (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Category:TV articles of unclear notability, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 22:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:21, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Category:TV articles of unclear notability, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:42, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
The file File:Self Portrait with Skeleton Arm.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unusued (aside from its own description), and higher-quality copies now on Commons
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the ((proposed deletion/dated files))
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing ((proposed deletion/dated files))
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vahurzpu (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Jfire,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding ((subst:Happy New Year fireworks)) to user talk pages.
Abishe (talk) 21:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello. Are you stalking my edits? There are several pages which you have edited after me, despite you not having any involvement beforehand. It seems there are quite a number of them to be just a coincidence: [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].
Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:43, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
I do not fault you in removing the prod. That's totally fair. That said... this article is total crap. It doesn't match the other "Crime in X" articles. Terribly written by a user with an axe to grind. It needs a full rewrite, but I'm not the guy to do it. But I can do what I can to help the process along. I highly suspect that if I draftify, the primary author will move it back to main article space. That leaves only one last option... AFD. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I refer to your revert of my edit to the above AfD. You do not appear to give a reason for doing so. Unless you have a good reason to remove my comments - that the article requires improvement, especially in providing the full name of the state and the nation per MoS - I strongly suggest that you reinstate it. I look forward to your response. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Morgan (engineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:24, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
Kia ora (hi) from me about the wikipedia page. I was told I needed to include a bit more cultural details (i.e. which iwi - tribe (indigenous) I belong to) as this is important in our country that, if you are Māori, you name your iwi (tribe). I try as much as possible not to 'interfere' with the content but thought I should also update the photo. Sorry if I have broken the rules Roxborogh (talk) 06:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
many thanks for your support of this page and excellent contributions, and also for cleaning up my referencing. I have taken note and will be more thorough in future. very much appreciated. Doctor 17 (talk) 01:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, given your involvement in the previous AfD on the same article; could you please have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Adidas sponsorships? Kind regards, Jeff5102 (talk) 13:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)