Skip to table of contents · Skip to current discussions · Purge this page

WP:FFD

XFD backlog
V	Apr	Total
CfD	10	10
TfD	0	0
MfD	1	1
FfD	0	0
RfD	38	38
AfD	0	0

Files for discussion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which may be unneeded or have either free content or non-free content usage concerns. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for either deletion or removal from pages if either a consensus to do so has been reached or the nominator specifically requests deletion or removal and no objections are raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.

What not to list here[edit]

For concerns not listed below, if a deletion is uncontroversial, do not use this process. Instead tag a file with ((subst:prod)). However, if the template is removed, please do not reinsert it; list the file for deletion then.
For speedy deletion candidates as well, do not use this page; instead use one of the speedy deletion templates. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
Files that have no source, have an unknown copyright, are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
1. ((subst:nsd)) if a file has no source indicated.
2. ((subst:nld)) if a file has a source but no licensing information.
3. ((subst:orfud)) if a file has a non-free copyright template but isn't used in any articles.
4. ((subst:rfu)) if a file has a non-free copyright template but could be replaced by a free file.
5. ((subst:dfu|reason)) if a file has a non-free copyright template but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed.
6. ((subst:nrd)) if a file has no non-free use rationale.
Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
1. ((db-f1|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix)) for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
2. ((now commons|File:NEW FILENAME)) if the file now exists on Commons, or ((now commons)) for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file ((db-f9)).
If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license but lacks verification of this (either by a VRT ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as ((subst:npd)).
Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
Description pages with no local file, even though they are in the file namespace, should not be listed here.
1. Redirects should be treated as in any other namespace: if no speedy deletion criteria apply, they should be listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.
2. Local description pages with no associated file are speedy-deletable under criterion G8; use ((db-imagepage)).
3. Local description pages for files hosted on Commons are usually speedy-deletable under criterion F2 if there is no content relevant to Wikipedia; use ((db-fpcfail)).
4. Any other local description pages for files hosted on Commons should be listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 8 for files.
If you are the uploader of the image, tag it with ((db-author)).

Instructions for listing files for discussion

Use Twinkle. If you can't, follow these steps to do manually:

1	Edit the file page. Add `((Ffd\|log=2024 April 30))` to the file page.
2	Create its FfD subsection. Follow this edit link and list the file using `((subst:Ffd2\|File_name.ext\|uploader=\|reason=))` `~~~~` Leave the subject heading blank. If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons. For listing additional files with the same reason, edit the first file section and use `((subst:Ffd2a\|File_name.ext\|Uploader=))` for each additional file. You may use this tool to quickly generate Ffd2a listings. Also, add `((Ffd\|log=2024 April 30))` to the top of the file page of each file other than the first one nominated.
3	Give due notice. Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using `((subst:Ffd notice\|File_name.ext))` Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media For multiple images by the same user, use `((subst:Ffd notice multi\|First_file.ext\|Second_file.ext\|Third_file.ext))` `~~~~` (can handle up to 26) If the image is in use, also consider adding `((FFDC\|File_name.ext\|log=2024 April 30))` to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

State the reasons why the file should be deleted, removed, or altered. Also, state what specific action should be taken, preferably in bold text; this allows discussion participants and closers to better understand the purpose of the nomination. Some examples of nomination statements include:

Delete. Orphaned with no foreseeable encyclopedic usage.
Delete. Replaced by File:FILE2.
Free (public domain) file may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States. This photograph was actually first published in 1931, not 1925.
Remove from ARTICLE1 and ARTICLE2. The file only meets WP:NFCC#8 with its use in ARTICLE3.
Non-free file may actually be free. This logo does not seem to meet the threshold of originality to be eligible for copyright in the United States and should actually be tagged free using ((PD-logo)).

Examples of what files you may request for discussion, deletion or change here:

Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version.
Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
Low quality – The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
Possibly unfree – The file is claimed as a freely licensed content, but may actually be protected by copyright in either the United States or its country of origin.
NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements.
Disputed copyright status – There is a disagreement between editors over the copyright status of a file. This includes, but is not limited to disputes about whether a file is: too simple for fair use, using the correct license tags, or accurately described by its description page.
Wrongly claimed as own – The file is under a self license, but the information on the file description pages suggests otherwise.

These are not the only "valid" reasons to discuss a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.

If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.

If you have general questions about a file and/or it's copyright status, then please start a new thread at Media Copyright Questions.

Deletion discussions
Deletion today Undeletion Deletion review Deletion log Request a copy of a deleted article
Articles
today all (sorted) closing log
Templates and modules
today all closing holding
Files
today all closing
Categories
today all closing speedy
Redirects
today all closing log
Miscellany
today all closing
Speedy deletion
candidates
Proposed deletion
all (sorted) BLPs
Policy Process Guide Administrator guidelines
v t e

Instructions for discussion participation[edit]

In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:

Wikipedia:NFCC#1 – Free equivalent is/is not available
Wikipedia:NFCC#8 – Significance
Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images 2 – Unacceptable image use

Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.

Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons''', you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.

Instructions for closing discussions[edit]

Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.

Old discussions[edit]

Shortcut

WP:FFDO

The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:

For older nominations, see the archives.

Discussions approaching conclusion[edit]

Discussions with at least 6 full days since nomination. After 7 days, they may be closed.

April 23

File:Huntertown IN seal.jpg

Dubious own-work claim. It's unclear if this seal is old enough to qualify for PD status. ✗plicit 05:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As it is already at Commons, and also nominated for deletion there, we will probably delete it either way - whether as an unneeded duplicate or as a copyright violation. Felix QW (talk) 08:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Get Ready For This - 2 Unlimited.ogg

De-PRODding rationale was this: Music sample should NOT be deleted as it is necessary to understand the article. Unfortunately, necessity rationale doesn't absolve the sample's potential failure to prove why omitting the sample harms the understanding of the whole song, the omission one part of WP:NFCC#8. The song was initially a composition, but then lyrics were added in another recording.

The whole sample is just music with one spoken line, and its role is the same as what free text already does: drive readers into seeking and then listening (versions of) the whole song. Furthermore, it doesn't fully represent (what) the whole song/composition (is about) and (how) the whole song/composition (had been done). George Ho (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The brief clip is shorter than most fair use audio commonly featured on Wikipedia, and I would argue is fairly representative of the entire song. The lorax (talk) 04:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Length of the sample isn't the main issue. The riff heard in the sample doesn't provide enough context about the entire song unless reliable sources prove its significance. So far, I haven't found sources substantially covering the riff and its significance to the song. George Ho (talk) 06:55, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NamibiaCGA.png

This is not the logo of the Namibian team, it is the logo of the Namibia Commonwealth Games Association (which doesn't have an article), and thus fails WP:NFCC#8. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:23, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 09:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tree is definitely above TOO. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 15:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Commonwealth Games New Zealand.png

This is not the logo of the New Zealand team, it is the logo of the New Zealand Commonwealth Games Association (which doesn't have an article), and thus fails WP:NFCC#8. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is unclear whether this rendition of the NZ leaf is below TOO, but I think per the PCP this should be deleted. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 10:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SEYCGA.png

This is not the logo of the Seychelles team, it is the logo of the Seychelles Commonwealth Games Association (which doesn't have an article), and thus fails WP:NFCC#8. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: below c:COM:TOO US. The only part that could be above TOO is the flags on either side of the Seychelles flag (I can't tell which one it is), but there isn't much sufficient artistic detail to differentiate it from other drawings of flags. Addition of mere shading does not constitute copyright protection (see File:Arkansas map by Sean Pecor.png). —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 10:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relicense per @Matrix. Kys5g^talk! 03:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, does not meet WP:NFCC#8 as currently used. IMO the birds in the logo are sufficiently complex to warrant the creation of copyright, so this should not be converted to PD. -Fastily 08:21, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vanuatu Commonwealth Games.png

This is not the logo of the Vanuatu team, it is the logo of the Vanuatu Commonwealth Games Association (which doesn't have an article), and thus fails WP:NFCC#8. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Below c:COM:TOO US, a PD flag and a symbol with little creativity with some text wrapped around is clearly below US TOO. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - _uselesscontributions} 09:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent nominations[edit]

April 24

File:WildlifeBlueHeronUtah.jpg

Incorrectly tagged with ((PD-USGov)). Actually a work of the Utah DMV. https://dmv.utah.gov/plates says "Copyright © 2024 State of Utah - All rights reserved." See also https://copyright.lib.harvard.edu/states/utah/ ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 00:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Utah license plates

Some more copyrightable Utah license plates; see above. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 01:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hyperspace 2020.jpg

Does not pass WP:NFCC: not required to understand the topic, not discussed critically, purely used as decoration, and the differences between this and the standard cover can be adequately described in text. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In doubt - Prove it that the readers usually blast it away (or understand correctly) without the album cover, but I support the reason that the topic isn't discussed critically (refer to Talk:Hyperspace (album)) see that there isn't any comments on the article talk page. Kys5g^talk! 16:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:4-cube 4^4.png

The file is located on Commons but it has not been deleted because uploader added a ((Keep local)). The file is not used on the front page or heavily used so the only reason for the Keep local is that the uploader found it easier to monitor files when they are local.

Sadly the uploader User:Spinningspark is deceased since more than a year ago so he can no longer monitor the files even if they are local. So the reason for the keep local is no longer there.

Files with a keep local can’t be deleted per CSD F8 but should be nominated for deletion. Per a few old discussion from September 23, 2020, October 1, 2020 and October 14, 2020 files can be deleted even if it has a keep local if uploader is no longer active and there is no other reason to keep it.

Spinningspark have uploaded more files with a keep local and many of those are most likely on Commons. If this file is deleted the question is if a FFD is needed for every single file of if there is a better way. MGA73 (talk) 13:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the FFD notice from Spinningspark's takl page because he is deceased. If anyone feel it is better to leave the notice there feel free to revert my removal. --MGA73 (talk) 14:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could CSD be used with a comment that the user is deceased? Constant314 (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps an idea could be to PROD the files with the rationale given above? Very likely to result in the same outcome as the CSD nomination while giving anyone watchlisting the file who may have an interest in it being kept locally a chance to speak up? Felix QW (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Both a CSD and a PROD works for me! --MGA73 (talk) 15:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo of Elsie Driggs.jpg

Now PD on Commons: c:File:Elsie-Driggs.jpg. Yann (talk) 19:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, version on Commons is better. --MGA73 (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Blatant violation of 1st criterion (copyright registered before 1929, 1927; now no longer protected). Also exists on Commons without "don't upload" notice or keep local request (CSD F8). More generally, reduction is good if it's non-free but beware of 8th criterion. By replacing the non-free copy with PD copy in the article that the image was used, then what the replacement deserves is removal in CSD F5. Kys5g^talk! 14:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 25

File:Joy Inside Out 2.jpg

No real reason for this file on the article. Riley's Headquarters is barely shown in the image and the character is well depicted by the infobox image. Fails WP:NFCC#8. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – This file also violates WP:NFCC#3a (minimal number of items). JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 01:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also support deleting it, but not in violation as you said. Just blast it away as redundant. (CSD F1) Kys5g^talk! 14:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 26

File:Ionapresentation.jpg

No evidence that this is not a recent rendering which attracts new copyright. Also consider this brief discussion at the media copyright questions noticeboard. Felix QW (talk) 07:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:King's Quest I - Quest for the Crown Coverart.jpg

Superseded by File:SierraOnLine-Box-KingsQuest1.jpg, which is under a free license. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The copyright holder of the file hosted on Commons accepted uploading the poster to the repository. Almost failed WP:NFCC#1. Kys5g^talk! 15:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart) - Dionne Warwick.jpg

Image taken from hitparade.ch was considered "irreplaceable" when my speedy deletion request was challenged with this rationale: The sleeve and the actual record are two different images and the sleeve is not replaceable with the record itself. Sure, the sleeve and actual record are two different items with different visuals, but upon further research, turns out the portion is not of a sleeve.

Indeed, when I requested speedy deletion, I just assumed it's a picture sleeve. I bet the one who challenged the request thought so as well. Actually, this is the front cover of a sheet music from overseas: ebay (1),ebay (2), abebooks. None of single releases use this image: discogs, 45cat. Not even the US release uses a picture sleeve. Unsure why hitparade.ch cropped the front cover and has posed it as a "cover art".

Of course, some editors would use a sheet music especially for the Beatles songs. This image, like any other sheet music or picture sleeve, uses an image of a singer and the song title. I'm more concerned about its ability to be contextually significant to the whole song You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart), especially if the image were to be omitted from this project. Furthermore, sheet musics have no longer been common since vinyl singles had been popular at the time.

Per WP:NFC#CS, justification for using the image depends on "due weight" and "balance", despite two common circumstances often used to prevent deletions of certain images. In this case, I've yet to see proof that the sheet music (or the image pretending to be a "cover art") is contextually significant to the song and that omitting the image would detriment understanding of the song. Reading the article, I couldn't find content that makes the song harder to understand without the sheet music.

The free image (File:Youll never get to heaven dionne warwick US single.png) doesn't have to comply with NFCC, especially the "contextual significance" part. Sure, it may not be the cover art, and it may not be a sheet music, but it's should be a more suitable replacement if the "irreplaceable" image I'm nominating is deemed NFCC-noncompliant. Even "irreplaceable" images may still fail NFCC. George Ho (talk) 19:46, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:"You Wouldn't Steal a Car".png

The source video at the 0:06 mark has a few frames that consist only of text and a completely black background. I believe that would fall under the ToO. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:50, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review and relicense per nom. While the entire video is copyrighted, a portion of the video that lacks originality isn't copyrighted. Kys5g^talk! 02:08, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a new image at File:You Wouldn't Steal a Car.png on Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 04:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart) - The Stylistics.jpg

My speedy deletion request was challenged with this rationale: The sleeve and the actual record are two different images and the sleeve is not replaceable with the record itself. The matter isn't the visual difference between the sleeve and the record. Speaking of sleeve, this cover art is of a German release (45cat, discogs). Of course, I challenged the image's "irreplaceability", but that's because "rfu"-tagged files have two days before deletion.

The bigger matter than the image's (supposed) "(ir)replaceability" is its "contextual significance" to the American pop(?) song "You'll Never Get to Heaven (If You Break My Heart)", sung multiple times. Per WP:NFC#CS, that depends on "due weight" and 'balance" of the song article. So far, I couldn't see free text having difficulty to describe the song without this image, and I haven't seen any content justifying use of this image. Furthermore, the whole image itself is just clouds in various colors with stripes, artist name, and song title. Also, the US release didn't use a picture sleeve.

The NFCC doesn't apply to the free image File:Youll never get to heaven the stylistics US single variant A.png in the way it does to this nominated image. In other words, the free image doesn't have to comply with the "contextual significance" criterion. George Ho (talk) 21:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information needed - While it isn't required for the sleeve image to follow the "contextual significance" requirement, but if uploaded to Commons, and it doesn't used for educational purposes (or for personal purposes), it falls out of the scope of Commons, and will have the same luck as non-free media not meeting "contextual significance" requirement - deleted speedily. Kys5g^talk! 02:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 27

File:Deftones - My Own Summer (Shove It) Disc 2.jpg

Using two cover art not compliant with WP:NFCC#3a. Preferring other cover art... George Ho (talk) 08:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, accidentally used FFD rather than PROD. --George Ho (talk) 08:12, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mixed-Up Mother Goose cover.jpg

A freely licensed version of the image with VRT permission has been made available at File:SierraOnLine-Box-MixedUpMotherGoose-Original.jpg on Commons. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daryl F. Gates' Police Quest - SWAT Coverart.png

Replaced with File:SierraOnLine-Box-SWAT1.jpg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:09, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Police Quest - SWAT 2 Coverart.png

Replaced with File:SierraOnLine-Box-SWAT2.jpg on Commons and no longer used. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:52, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weight, Band.ogg

The matter isn't whether the text and the sample are different or same. Well, I cited the "minimal number of items" criterion, which says that a non-free content must not convey equivalent significant information, as one of reasons for deletion. Text and sample may or may not provide same info, but I bet there'll be disagreements. The song title, the band name, and text content already suffice to convey same info that the sample does: what the song is expected to be, and what we can learn about the song before listening the actual recording(s). Compare those elements to those of a movie poster or a video cover art.

Actually, the bigger issue than that is the sample's (in)ability to be "contextually significant" to the song in question. De-PRODded by admin with this rationale: Text does not have the same impact as hearing part of the chorus of this important and influential rock song from one of most important bands of the 1960s and 70s. It's iconic. As "iconic" the song has been, I still have trouble believing that the chorus in the sample would improve understanding of the whole song, "The Weight", and that omitting the whole sample would detriment/harm such understanding. Even meeting the "critical commentary" rule still wouldn't make the sample "contextually significant", IMO.

Re-reading WP:NFC#CS, this comes down to "due weight" and "balance" provided by the article, even with two common circumstances. The "Composition" section seems as if it justifies using the sample, but it's more about the whole lyrics than what is entailed in the whole portion itself. Furthermore, even the lyrics of the chorus would be easier to summarize than perceived to be (difficult?). George Ho (talk) 21:58, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: The reason for deletion is too long. Not all users (include admins) understand the reason to support deleting (or deleting) the sample. As said on Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 April 22, The render of contextual significance may vary per reader. Kys5g^talk! 02:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is "Fails WP:NFCC#8" a short, concise reason to delete it? If not, what about "Sample not contextually significant to understanding the whole song"? George Ho (talk) 04:33, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 28

File:Police Quest 1 cover.png

A freely licensed image of the cover is now available as File:SierraOnLine-Box-PoliceQuest1.jpg on Commons. The only issue with the free image is the system requirements label partially obscures the Sierra logo. However, this should not be a deal breaker. Ixfd64 (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Almost all posters from Sierra On-Line are Creative Commons-licensed. More generally, these posters also have permit from the holder, under many VRTS tickets. Kys5g^talk! 02:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Showcase 006.jpg

This is unneeded non-free media: a perfectly fine file is in the infobox that serves the same purpose of identifying the early Challengers lineup. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:39, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary: We can change the file's rationale. It is shown in "Publication history" section of the article, and stated that:

The adventuring quartet the Challengers of the Unknown debuted in Showcase #6 (February 1957), in an uncredited story attributed to Jack Kirby for art and to Kirby and Dick Wood for script, under editor Jack Schiff at the Grand Comics Database.

Per the statement above, I concur that deletion is unnecessary, because it's subject of sourced commentary within the section, about the debut of the adventuring quartet. Kys5g^talk! 03:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 29

File:Hassal sharif shrine painting.jpg

The caption credits the image to a Fahad Naseer. The fact that the uploader is the subject of the photo does not mean they are the copyright holder. Evidence of permission from Naseer is required. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shakira - She Wolf music video.jpg

The image is appropriately explained in text already in the music video section, therefore its omission will not harm the topic. It does not add context and is therefore NOT required and doesn't meet the conditions of WP:NFCC >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

April 30

File:Space Quest - The Sarien Encounter Coverart.png

A freely licensed image of the cover is now available at File:SierraOnLine-Box-SpaceQuest1 EGA.jpg on Commons. The free version is slightly lower in quality and has labels that are not part of the original cover. However, I believe it can still adequately replace this non-free image. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:07, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You ask for these Sierra's deletion so many times. Delete this and earlier nominations of images owned by Sierra On-Line (including but not limited to game cover arts). Kys5g^talk! 09:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seal of University of Phoenix.svg

The image is not available at the listed source. WP:NFCC#4 30Four (talk) 03:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and upload newer versions: Outdated logo. The current source has changed their design. Kys5g^talk! 09:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:WBBL05 Cap Logo Heat.svg

This file doesn't significantly increase the reader's understanding of the topic. The main article of the club, Brisbane Heat (WBBL), already has a logo in its infobox. If you look throughout Wikipedia, no other 20XX-YY Foo Bar season article, of which there are many, has a logo in the infobox. Check for example Category:Aston Villa F.C. seasons, Category:Arsenal F.C. seasons etc. Jonteemil (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bank of Estonia new logo.svg

Estonian official symbols of the State and insignia of official organizations (flags, coats of arms, orders, medals, badges, etc.) are not copyrighted per § 5 of Estonian Copyright Act 1992. Kys5g^talk! 14:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Footer[edit]

Today is April 30 2024. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 April 30 – (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply ((subst:Ffd log)) to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===April 30===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for discussion page (the one you're on now) work.

The page Wikipedia:Files for discussion/Today will always show today's log.

v t e Wikipedia community
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the Community portal. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the Dashboard.
General community topics	Administration News The Signpost Goings-on In the media Meetups Mailing lists Wikipedians Statistics The Wikipedia Library Centralized discussion Village pump Idea lab Policy Proposals Technical Miscellaneous WMF Holidays Bots
Contents and grading	Requested articles Most-wanted articles Images needing articles Articles needing images Articles for creation WP:AFC/R WP:AFC/C Creation Help Vital articles Articles for improvement Peer review Good article nominations Featured article candidates Lists Pictures Topics Article translation Pages Main Page Errors
WikiProjects and collaborations	Directory Culture and the arts Geographical History and society Science, technology and engineering Wikipedia assistance and tasks Patrols Recent changes Counter-Vandalism Unit Version 1.0 Editorial Team Accessibility Organizations category
Awards and feedback	Reward board Contests A nice cup of tea and a sit down Charitableness WikiLove Compliment before criticism Kindness Campaign Thanks!
Maintenance tasks	Task Center Open tasks Backlog Category Admin category Edit requests Category Database reports Category tracker Dusty articles Special pages New pages Recent changes Controversial issues
Administrators and noticeboards	Administrators' noticeboard Incidents Edit warring Vandalism Admin dashboard Admin requests Closure Page protection User permissions Sockpuppets Open proxies Revision deletion Oversight Request Usernames Changing Title blacklist OTRS Bureaucrats' Requests for adminship and bureaucratship Arbitration Committee Requests Enforcement
Content dispute resolution	Requests for comment Third opinion Dispute resolution noticeboard Biographies of living persons Conflict of interest External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view No original research Reliable sources
Other noticeboards and assistance	Regional notice boards Requests for help Category Asking questions Teahouse Help desk Reference desk Adopt-a-user Copyright assistance Copyright investigations Text problems Media questions Resource requests Mergers History mergers Moves Page importation Spam Blacklist Whitelist Bots Education General sanctions Editor sanctions Long-term abuse
Deletion discussions	Guide Admin Today Articles Templates Files Categories Redirects Miscellany Speedy Proposed BLP Review Undeletion Arguments to avoid Arguments to make Article Rescue
Elections and votings	Requests for comment (meta) Wikimedia Foundation elections WP Democracy Voting is not evil Milestones
Directories, indexes, and summaries	Departments Edit summary legend Editor's index Essays FAQs Glossary Abbreviations Help Manual of Style Simplified Rules Five pillars Policies Guidelines Shortcuts Templates Citation templates Tips Today Tools Wiki markup
Media Category Templates