Speedy renaming or speedy merging of categories may be requested only if they meet a speedy criterion, for example WP:C2D (consistency with main article's name) or WP:C2C (consistency with established category tree names). Please see instructions below.
Please note that a speedy request must state which of the narrowly defined criteria strictly applies. Hence, any other non-speedy criteria, even "common sense" or "obvious", may be suitable points but only at a full discussion at WP:Categories for discussion.
Request may take 48 hours to process after listing if there are no objections. This delay allows other users to review the request to ensure that it meets the speedy criteria for speedy renaming or merging, and to raise objections to the proposed change.
Categories that qualify for speedy deletion (per Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion, e.g. "patent nonsense", "recreation") can be tagged with the regular speedy tags, such as ((db|reason)) with no required delay. Empty categories can be deleted if they remain empty 7 days after tagging with ((db-empty)). Renaming under C2E can also be processed instantly as it is a variation on G7.
To oppose a speedy request you must record your objection within 48 hours of the nomination. Do this by inserting immediately under the nomination:
Oppose, (the reasons for your objection). ~~~~
You will not be able to do this by editing the page WP:Categories for discussion. Instead you should edit the section WP:Categories for discussion#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here or the page WP:Categories for discussion/Speedy#Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here (WP:CFDS). Be aware that in the course of any discussion, the nomination and its discussion may get moved further down the page purely for organizational convenience – you may need to search WP:CFDS to find the new location. Participate in any ongoing discussion but, unless you withdraw your opposition, a knowledgeable person may eventually bring forward the nomination and discussion to become a regular CFD discussion. At that stage you may add further comments but your initial opposition will still be considered. However, if after seven days there has been no support for the request, and no response from the nominator, the request may be dropped from further consideration as a speedy.
Contested speedy requests become stale, and can be un-tagged and de-listed after 7 days of inactivity. Optionally, if the discussion may be useful for future reference, it may be copied to the category talk page, with a section heading and ((moved discussion from|[[WP:CFDS]]|2=~~~~)). If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at WP:Categories for discussion (CfD) in accordance with its instructions.
If you belatedly notice and want to oppose a speedy move that has already been processed, contact one of the admins who process the Speedy page. If your objection seems valid, they may reverse the move, or start a full CFD discussion.
Correction of spelling errors and capitalization fixes. Differences between British and American spelling (e.g. Harbours → Harbors) are not considered errors; however if the convention of the relevant category tree is to use one form over the other then a rename may be appropriate under C2C. If both spellings exist as otherwise-identical category names, they should be merged.
Appropriate conversion of hyphens into en dashes or vice versa (e.g. Category:Canada-Russia relations → Category:Canada–Russia relations).
Correction of obvious grammatical errors, such as a missing conjunction (e.g. Individual frogs toads → Individual frogs and toads). This does not include changing the plurality of a noun when such the distinction between topic and set categories is uncertain.
C2B: Consistency with established Wikipedia naming conventions and practices
Bringing a category into line with established naming conventions for that category tree, or into line with the various "x by y", "x of y", or "x in y" categorization conventions specified at Wikipedia:Category names
This should be used only where there is no room for doubt that the category in question is being used for the standard purpose instead of being a potential subcategory.
This criterion should be applied only when there is no ambiguity or doubt over the existence of a category naming convention. Such a convention must be well defined and must be overwhelmingly used within the tree. If this is not the case then the category in question must be brought forward to a full Cfd nomination.
This applies only if the related page's current name (and by extension, the proposed name for the category) is:
unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator); and
uncontroversial, either because of longstanding stability at that particular name, or because the page was just moved (i) after a page move discussion resulted in explicit consensus to rename, or (ii) unilaterally to reflect an official renaming which is verified by one or more citations (provided in the nomination). C2D does not apply if the result would be contrary to guidelines at WP:CATNAME, or there is any ongoing discussion about the name of the page or category, or there has been a recent discussion concerning any of the pages that resulted in a no consensus result, or it is controversial in some other way.
This criterion may also be used to rename a set category in the same circumstances, where the set is defined by a renamed topic; e.g. players for a sports team, or places in a district.
Before nominating a category to be renamed per WP:C2D, consider whether it makes more sense to move the article instead of the category.
This criterion applies only if the author of a category requests or agrees to renaming within six months of creating the category.
The criterion does not apply if other editors have populated or changed the category since it was created. "Other editors" includes bots that populated the category, but excludes an editor working with the author on the renaming.
This criterion applies if the category contains only an eponymous article, list or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories, where applicable. Nominations should use ((subst:cfm-speedy)) (speedy merger) linking to a suitable parent category, or to another appropriate category (e.g. one that is currently on the article).
Admin instructions
When handling the listings:
Make sure that the listing meets one of the above criteria.
With the exception of C2E, make sure that it was both listed and tagged at least 48 hours previously.
Make sure that there is no opposition to the listing; if there is a discussion, check if the opposing user(s) ended up withdrawing their opposition.
A nomination to merge or rename, brought forward as a full CfD, may be speedily closed if the closing administrator is satisfied that:
The nomination clearly falls within the scope of one of the criteria listed here, and
No objections have been made within 48 hours of the initial nomination.
If both these conditions are satisfied, the closure will be regarded as having been as a result of a speedy nomination. If any objections have been raised then the CfD nomination will remain in place for the usual 7-day discussion period, to be decided in accordance with expressed consensus.
Add requests for speedy renaming and merging here
If the category and desired change do not match one of the criteria mentioned in C2, do not list it here. Instead, list it in the main CFD section.
If you are in any doubt as to whether it qualifies, do not list it here.
Use the following format on a new line at the beginning of the list:
* [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
(The four ~ will sign and datestamp the entry automatically.)
If the current name should be redirected rather than deleted, use:
*REDIRECT [[:Category:old name]] to [[:Category:new name]] – Reason ~~~~
A request may be completed if it is more than 48 hours old; that is, if the time stamp shown is earlier than 17:16, 3 September 2024 (UTC). Currently, there are 2,064 open requests (refresh).
Administrators and page movers: Do not use the "Move" tab to move categories listed here! Categories are processed following the 48-hour discussion period and are moved by a bot.
Category:People from Bilyayivka to Category:People from Biliaivka – C2D: Main article renamed after formal RM. —MichaelZ.22:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose speedy as an explicit exception to WP:C2D. Quoting: "This [criterion] applies only if the related page's current name (and by extension, the proposed name for the category) is unambiguous (so it generally does not apply to proposals to remove a disambiguator from the category name, even when the main article is the primary topic of its name, i.e. it does not contain a disambiguator)." This may be proposed and discussed in a full CfD discussion though. Place Clichy (talk) 12:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as well as C2D clearly does not apply in this case. The nominator also failed to list the subcategories in which many could be considered less ambiguous but would still require a full discussion. There was a fun debate on this topic at CFD/S last year. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me21:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See, none of this makes sense to me. If consensus deemed the singer as the primary topic, categorisation should reflect that. If we can't at the very least do that, maybe consensus was wrong. Sean Stephens (talk) 00:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Sean Stephens: there is much sense to what you write, and you are invited to open a full discussion (at WP:CFD). People don't disagree with you, this just does not fall under the restricted cases when a longer discussion can be skipped. Place Clichy (talk) 04:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Communist Party of China Committee Secretaries of Rehe Province to Category:Chinese Communist Party committee secretaries of Rehe Province
Category:Communist Party Secretaries of Xi'an to Category:Chinese Communist Party committee secretaries of Xi'an
Comment@Good Olfactory: for concision I would suggest Category:Communist Party secretaries of Foo for local-level categories. The full title is a bit cumbersome, and when the name of a location is present the words Chinese and committee can be implied when one talks of a party secretary. A main article link or category explanation could help if you find that the scope is not obvious enough. Place Clichy (talk) 14:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the more concise names are eligible for speedying. If we speedily rename the head categories I can follow-up on the others with a full discussion. Good Ol’factory(talk)00:31, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Good Olfactory: I would approve that: no objection to rename the head categories per C2D (as you may have noticed, I found identically-named main articles) while fixing capitalization and plural, but submit the local categories to full discussion to a less redundant name. Place Clichy (talk) 04:42, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Ukraine political party colours templates to Category:Ukraine political party colour templates – C2C: Consistency with the rest of Category:Europe political party colour templates. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question, in the proposed names "Georgia (country)" is apparently used as an adjective. Do we have other categories in which "Georgia (country)" is used as an adjective? Marcocapelle (talk) 10:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that they were all using the adjective form, that is exactly the reason I started asking the question. If and only if "Georgia (country)" is used elsewhere as an adjective we have a case of C2C. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the anti–death penalty ones above. Using an endash is appropriate here per MOS:PREFIXDASH. These are activists and organizations that are against the death penalty, not penalty activists and organizations that are anti-death. The decision to ignore endash guidelines should be adopted in a full CFD if it is adopted. Good Ol’factory(talk)22:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the anti–death penalty ones above. Using an endash is appropriate here per MOS:PREFIXDASH. These are treaties and laws that are against the death penalty, not penalty laws and treaties that are anti-death. The decision to ignore endash guidelines should be adopted in a full CFD if it is adopted.Good Ol’factory(talk)22:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't this a bit premature, considering there hasn't been a Commonwealth Games since Swaziland changed its name? These competitors competed for Swaziland. Sionk (talk) 19:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While it is technically correct that their country was called Swaziland then, this is in essence the same thing that changed name rather than a new topic entirely. Main article Eswatini at the Commonwealth Games was renamed just as equivalent articles for other international competitions, and the Eswatini Olympic and Commonwealth Games Association officially changed its name, in 2018, making these changes eligible per speedy criterion WP:C2D as well. Under your rationale, in case Eswatini takes part in Commonwealth Games in 2022 and wins a silver medal but no bronze, would you rename the first three categories but not the last one? I do not think this would make sense. Place Clichy (talk) 12:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose speedy I agree Muslim and Islamic are not both necessary, because Islamic covers the fact that they are Muslim, however I would support renaming to 'Shia Islamic Scholars' as Muslim scholars includes both Muslims who have studied secular courses and Ulama, whereas Islamic scholars refers to Ulama. Amirahtalk22:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Islands of South Georgia to Category:Islands of South Georgia (island) (not sure if this one works; can something be an island of an island? – I think so)
The main article's Infobox names the archipelago as South Georgia group, so I suggest we use Category:Islands of the South Georgia group. – FayenaticLondon17:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
At that May discussion. My understanding is that there wasnt actually a concentration camp there, although I'm not very clear what the distinction between a prison and concentration camp is. But if you think these need more discussion please move these to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Rathfelder (talk) 15:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Commons uses "ventilation fans", which may be appropriate. Meanwhile it might be useful to split the contents between hand fans and machines.– FayenaticLondon12:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Check Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion for out of process deletions. In some cases, these will need to be nominated for discussion and the editor who emptied the category informed that they should follow the WP:CFD process.