AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article is mainly promotional in nature, cites the subject's press release as a source, and arguably violates TOU per maintenance tag. Any truly notable material can easily be merged into similar articles. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 3 d) (Hyper-local niche family owned grocery store with mere three stores in the Portland, Oregon metro area. Fails WP:NCORP Coverages are all routine and hyper-local. Graywalls (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (I've done some research into Druxy's and it doesn't seem to be notable at all. If you search in Google News, they only mention a few things such as an acquisition and a listeria incident. Indeed, I would even say that this coverage is merely trivial.
Also, Williams Fresh Cafe doesn't even have its own article on Wikipedia.
If there's any new info about its notability feel free to share it otherwise, this article should be deleted. Thank you. WizardGamer775 (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This doesn't deserve it's own article- It only appeared in five episodes and has no notable significance. I think this article should be deleted. WizardGamer775 (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Unreferenced essay/WP:OR, which is extra problematic as this topic is related to medical areas, where we want above-average quality. No footnotes, two not very reliably looking external links, tagged as needing more sources since 2012. If nobody can improve this, WP:ATD-R target to consider could be Food preservation perhaps? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (Fails WP:SUSTAINED. The only two reliable, independent citations are from right when the website was created, and they reek of churnalism. Might be worth a mention on Web Standards Project but doesn't seem to deserve its own page. Apocheir (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP, all citations to otherwise reliable sources read more like press releases or advertising than actual reporting. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Minor software project whose development appears to have ended around 2009, with the project still in a "pre-alpha" stage, and whose parent project (the Parrot virtual machine) was itself pining for the fjords officially discontinued in 2017. No third-party references in the article, and I wasn't able to find any online either. Omphalographer (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (Only reliable source I could identify is Tiroler Tageszeitung. But the article appears to be about Lyoness, which already had an article at Lyoness although lead states now myWorld. (Speedy deletion was contested) IgelRM (talk) 23:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-04
Oniro OS (Family of open-source operating systems based on OpenHarmony)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP: N. The Quigley source in the existing article isn't reliable, nor are any other sources I could find online. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-09
Nulloy (Open source audio player with seekbar as waveform)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (I can't find any coverage from a reliable source about this software, so I think it fails WP: N. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NOPAGE in my view, and should be redirected to the entry at List of Generation Z slang. Seemingly all reliable sources documenting this word do so in the context of providing brief explanations of what the word is (presumably for an audience of confused parents of Gen Alpha children), and lack substantial cultural or etymological analysis, making expansion prospects for the article dim. Mach61 04:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Insufficient notability, perhaps merge into a Truck Simulator community section? Apart from unreliable Metro, sources appear to be about a community around the game as a whole. IgelRM (talk) 12:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Kept at previous AfD based in part due to conduct of nom, this company does not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Zero secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (I couldn't find any significant English sources, and the Chinese sources that I found seemed to be the company's financial reports. QuietCicadachirp 17:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 3 d) (Non-notable (fails WP:GNG) and promotional. There are sources, but they are not reliable. Moreover, stricter scrutininy should be given to them per WP:NCORP and WP:ORGIND. Local Variable (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Contested PROD, appears to fail WP:NCORP. IgelRM (talk) 10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
A Motley Vision (Multi-author blog featuring criticism of the Mormon arts, LDS literature and film)
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (This isn't a notable blog. The only sources are the blog itself. Big Money Threepwood (talk) 04:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Douglas Kim (Korean-American poker player (born 1983))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. His only fame is as poker player during the World Series of Poker in 2006. Does not have further poker career and the article only focuses mostly his involvement in the incel ideology within the Asian American community, with no references. Toadboy123 (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Epos Now (Software provider based in Norwich, England)
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (I can't find any reasonable purpose for a standalone article. I noticed this could be vandalism since the parenthesis isn't movable except by an admin. Well, I can't find sources which didn't provide me enough reasons to be inclusive. Fails WP: GNG. The founding company doesn't seem to be notable or reach any WP: ORG and some of not all seems to base on the company and not the subject (there could be mentions) but still Notability is not inherited. While I believe Notability is not permanent, The young subject can be notable in the future All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 07:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Just because it's a wiki project doesn't mean it's notable. All the sources that I reviewed are primary sources, data table of activity, passing mentions. The only article that seems to talk in any material way about wikibooks does so from a Wikipedia centric view and how it's complementary [1] I don't feel like this article will survive a 3 reliable reference rule audit. Greatder (talk) 01:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NCORP, coverage is of "top startups" variety and reprints partnership announcements. The best coverage is of the Times Square billboard incident, but it's really not about the company, it's an action by its co-founder, and notability is not inherited. ~ A412talk! 17:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This "social enterprise" does not seem to have enough significant coverage or reliable sources to meet WP:NORG. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Similar to what has occurred with The Sims 2, I have created independent pages for each expansion pack, which strike me as independently notable and therefore appropriately demerged once the proper review sources were found and drafted on each page. This article now has no purpose other than as a list that would hypothetically be better assimilated as a WP:MERGE with the primary page The Sims. This change has been signalled on the talk page for a while without objection. The article now offers little information on its own that couldn't be found on a page for the game or the individual expansions, and is therefore appropriate for deletion. Nonetheless putting this page to an AfD for visibility and proper discussion given that it is a major article change. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Coverage is routine and lacking significant independent reporting (mostly interviews). It does not meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 22:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-16
Heather Mason (Fictional character in Silent Hill 3)
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Having a hard time to find any SIGCOV about Heather per WP:BEFORE, either at google scholar (I might be wrong). Ref 26 and 27 might be helpful, but isn't enough to pull WP:GNG around somehow. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 11:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Red Bull making a venture into esports is notable; this is attested to by the reliable sources given. The organization itself was never notable during its history as it never made it to a top-tier league, nor did it ever sign notable players. The sources given may justify a few sentences talking about this failed venture at the Red Bull article, but it does not justify this former esports organization having its own article. Yue🌙 19:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:TOOSOON for an unpublished, previewed-but-not-otherwise-announced, video game. Two of the four sources are the same author, and the other two are heavily interview quotes.
My preferred result here is draftify, which I'd do unilaterally except that the article is older than 90d per WP:DRAFTIFY. ~ A412talk! 05:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases and baby name websites. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 03:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (PROD removed. Random name that fails WP:NNAME and WP:NOTDICT. No sources found outside of dictionary definitions, databases and baby name websites. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 03:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I had turned this article into a redirect to Rohan, Middle-earth#Horses and warfare on January 12 of this year, which was undone on February 29. I can't see evidence of notability for this name; it fails WP:NNAME and the sources I could find are limited to baby name websites and dictionaries, so it may also be a WP:NOTDICT fail. Alternatively, the redirect could be restored, or it could be redirected to Darwin (given name) or Darwin (surname). AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 03:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 4 d) (Relatively new journal, not indexed in any selective database, does not meet WP:NJournals. The current version of the article has 11 references. However, almost all are not independent, but either published by the journal itself or its publisher. One independent source is an article in The Washington Post, which is stated to have used the journal to "source" an article. This is somewhat of an exaggeration: the TWP article cites Billy Tringali, mentioning that he's the editor of the Journal of Anime and Manga Studies, so in fact this is just an in passing mention. Taken together, this article also misses WP:GNG, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (Not a G4, however with only one independent source and the concerns from the prior AfD, I'm still not sure it's notable. StarMississippi 12:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Comic world arc/plot summary and nothing but (no references, either, one broken EL). No reception, or analysis, my BEFORE failed to find anything substantial. Fails WP:GNG. Suggest redirecting to List of New X-Men story arcs per WP:ATD-R. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Sci-fi book series. Sadly (I liked this in my younger days...) this article seems to fail WP:GNG. Unreferenced too. My BEFORE fails to find anything. ISFDb lists only one review for first and third book in the series ([2]) so it may be hard to even try to argue that book reviews for individual books here might save this. In either case, what we have is just a plot summary with some old and unreferenced fan speculation about the series' future. Per WP:ATD-R, this can be redirected to the author's bio, where the series is mentioned (or maybe better, to John Ringo bibliography). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Collection of text summarized from pages on the constituent novels and the references only concern individual books. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NBOOK, and WP:BKD, does not provide the reader with anything that could not be gleaned almost as easily from just a directory of wikilinks to the existing pages. Orchastrattor (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (Like many 'in fiction' and like topics, there is a chance this is a notable topic (a good one, given sources like [3]). Unfortunately, our current execution is simply terrible. Just three footnotes. A WP:OR prose opening with no source, followed by a gigantic list of random works that mention this topic that fails WP:IPC/MOS:TRIVIA. This needs to be rewritten from scratch, as nothing here is rescuable, or in other words, this merits a WP:TNT treatment, although a WP:ATD-R alternative is to redirect this to Tachyon#In_fiction, from which it was spun long time ago. The short section there is at least referenced, if poorly - but still better than what we have here. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Comic series, short-lived (4-years), unreferenced since 2007, my BEFORE failed to find anything useful. Fails WP:GNG, WP:V. If nobody can rescue this, potential redirects targets per WP:ATD-R: [[ Mark Alessi]] (co-creator), CrossGen (publisher). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (This article fails notability guidelines as per WP:CREATIVE and was published by another editor after failed attempts by the subject to create a promotional autobiography. Redtree21 (talk) 03:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This article cites zero sources, and has not since the page started existing in 2016. The subject is about a single character in a niche show that aired on Adult Swim, hardly the notability required of a Wikipedia article. Samoht27 (talk) 06:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (9 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Yes there are a couple of obituaries here but it appears that only one of her books was notable and appears in any libraries. They may be notable one day but right now it's WP:TOOSOON𝔓420°𝔓Holla 11:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Searched and found no additional reliable sources to support notability. Appears non-notable. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 03:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (18 years with only primary sources. This character isn't notable and should be redirected Big Money Threepwood (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Normally I would redirect this article to List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters, but I do not think that would be appropriate because not only does the single source only mention this character in passing, but the article itself mentions more than one possible name for the character. Erpertblah, blah, blah... 12:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
Heather Mason (Fictional character in Silent Hill 3)
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Having a hard time to find any SIGCOV about Heather per WP:BEFORE, either at google scholar (I might be wrong). Ref 26 and 27 might be helpful, but isn't enough to pull WP:GNG around somehow. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 11:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article recently created by disclosed paid editors from BYU. Despite the extensive references, most scholarship on the Book of Mormon is conducted by Mormons so whether WP:INDY sourcing requirement is met is unclear. For example, Catholicism and Judaism, among others, have produced vast bodies of scholarship on their own religion, but only the clearly notable topics of Catholic canon law or Jewish exegetical literature are summarized here for the non-specialist reader.
While a proposed merge to First Nephi would also have been a reasonable course, I believe a full AfD is more likely to attract more independent comments and form a clearer community consensus. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This person does not have many citations and is only known for allegations of sexual misconduct. Yolandagonzales (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (Last AfD was no consensus due to low participation. 1st AfD a weak keep with low participation in 2008, when standards were lower. I couldn't establish that he meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, or a good WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Non-notable band. No coverage in RS, also by NEXIST. Promotional writeup. Circular sourcing, for example here: On June 11, 2012, it was announced on the band's Facebook page that the band has decided to record a new album., i.e. the band member(s) make "announcements" on FB then quote themselves on WP. Has already twice been deleted at Hewiki. No updates since 2013. gidonb (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Unfortunately seems to be a non-notable event backed up by just a single secondary source from Slate -- no independent third-party coverage apart from that (I was unable to find anything meaningful myself). The rest of the article is just spun off from primary sources. KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬 21:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
Jason Perlow (American technology and food blogger)
AfD (3 k, 5 d) (Not seeing how WP:BASIC has been met for this individual. Seems to be a lack of independent sources that I can find. JMWt (talk) 10:04, 23 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-Notable actor and journalist, failed in wikipedia general notability guideline Also, I noticed that this article has been accused of being a 'paid article' before, and the same argument was made in the last nomination as well. So I think now the editors should be allowed to decide. Thanks you. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 07:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (No proof of notability, no reliable sources that back up claims. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 17:30, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-02-28
Fidel Vargas (American politician in California (born 1968))
AfD (2 k, 3 d) (Previously nominated in a 48-article bundle which was closed as a procedural keep due to the bundle's size. This person has received some coverage in the LA Times, among other sources, but most of it is WP:ROTM election coverage. The only good thing I could find was this from the LA Times, this from Al Día News and maybe this from Hispanic Executive. The latter two are not major sources. The rest of the coverage that I could find is non-independent. He has held many positions within presidential administrations but none of them confer notability, and I don't think being named in a Time magazine makes you notable either. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-02-28
Zhuan Zhu (Chinese assassin of King Liao of Wu (died 515 BC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Subject is not notable and BIO1E applies. I could find pre-Wikipedia sources like this and this but they only mention him as the assassin of King Liao. This seemingly can't be draftified and redirects are costly. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This one sentence biography article has zero references, and is not sufficient to establish notability. The Japanese Wikipedia article for the person has just one cite, insufficient to be notable. After searching, found social media, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of the person. Article was created on 22 January 2005 JoeNMLC (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (WP:BLP of a political organizer, not properly sourced as having a genuinely strong claim to passing WP:NPOL. As currently written, the main notability claim here is that he exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of strong evidence that he would pass WP:GNG -- and while this is a pared-back version of an article that's been moderately longer in the past, I can't revert to older versions as they contained criminal allegations that can't be in the article at all without airtight sourcing for them, and might still just make him a WP:BLP1E anyway. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody wants to write a substantial article and source it properly, but the scandal can't be in the article at all without solid sourcing for it, and he just doesn't have any other meaningful notability claims if this is all that can be said about him outside of the scandal. Bearcat (talk) 06:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
Chanuka Wijesundara (Sri Lankan-born Canadian entrepreneur and web developer)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Sources all appear to be WP:PRIMARY either interviews with the subject or clear press release republications. Promotional and fails WP:BIO. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly referenced as passing notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work -- but this article was "sourced" predominantly to IMDb and his own LinkedIn and streaming copies of his films on YouTube, which are not support for notability, and even the three footnotes I didn't strip are still primary sources that still aren't support for notability, with not even one hit of GNG-worthy third-party coverage shown. And the closest thing to a notability claim is that he won a minor local-interest award that isn't prominent enough to clinch passage of WP:ANYBIO all by itself. The notability test on Wikipedia, as always, doesn't hinge on saying that he did stuff -- it hinges on the amount of media coverage that he did or didn't get for doing stuff, and nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 3 d) (I'm not finding anything to substantiate the notability of this artist per WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. The article is mainly referenced to primary sources from a group exhibition called "Techspressionism", in which he showed an artwork. An online BEFORE search finds lots of social media, and user-submitted content, and more primary sources. I found one good news source, [4] but that is not enough to put him over the bar, as what is needed are multiple, independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. WP:COI seems evident. Netherzone (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Redirect undone. Actor appearing in a early 1990s' video and that's pretty much it. WP:NOTINHERITED and fails WP:NACTOR. I suggest reinstating the redirect to song "No Rain", the video in which she appeared. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 04:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Draft that was declined and eventually deleted. User requested undeletion to improve it and instead simply removed the decline notice and moved the draft to articlespace. Fails WP:NBIO. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This is a resume, not an article with reliable sources and significant coverage to demonstrate notability. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. A Google search only shows passing mentions in articles, no significant coverage. He was mostly a minor league referee that officiated in a small handful of NHL games. Not notable enough for an article. My Pants Metal (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (The subject lacks substantial coverage in reputable third-party sources and fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:MUSICBIO. The existing sources do not establish notability effectively. Additionally, the source from middleeasteye.net is an interview, and its reliability is questionable, infomigrants.net is not reliable, and the article from The Guardian seems to rely heavily on hearsay. A WP:BEFORE search yielded no additional reliable sources beyond those currently cited. GSS💬 14:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (I could not find significant coverage of him to meet WP:BIO. Also does not meet WP:PROF, google scholar comes up with a namesake who is an expert in sexual health. LibStar (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
Abi Carter (American singer-songwriter (born 1997))
AfD (2 k, 4 d) (Coverage does not go "beyond the context of a single event" per WP:NOTWHOSWHO, in this case, one audition on one episode of a reality show (an extremely minor "event"). Even if coverage continues in the future it is highly unlikely to warrant more than some sentences at American Idol (season 22). Heartfox (talk) 05:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:SIGCOV. Only sources in the entire article are awards he has received for his projects, and none of the info in the lead is verified in the body (if there even is a body). 🔥Jalapeño🔥Stupid stuff I did 12:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (I think that this article should be reverted to its pre-existing redirect to Members_of_the_Red_Army_Faction#Third_generation_Red_Army_Faction_(1982–1993) on WP:BLPCRIME and GNG considerations. In contrast to other 3rd generation RAF members Daniela Klette and Ernst-Volker Staub, Garweg has not actually been convicted of any crime. Coverage is fleeting, exclusively in the context of suspected activities in the third-generation RAF, and the stronger of the cited sources, Der Spiegel solely frames criminal charges against Garweg beyond association with the third-generation RAF in attribution to the authorities rather than as statements of fact, as well as stating that little is known about Burkhard Garweg (Über Burkhard Garweg ist nur wenig bekannt). signed, Rosguilltalk 15:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Like his father, Alfred Cowles Jr., good sourcing is lacking. Reads like a genealogical entry. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Previous AfD was no consensus. However, some suggested merging/moving to Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Foundation but that now redirects here. I still believes he fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG on every level. Most of the citations fail verification. Prod was contested with reasoning that significant coverage exists in books, good faith search found that is not the case. Spagooder (talk) 05:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Ambassador who doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. The citations in the article do not appear to pass WP:GNG, and the closest I could find with Google search was this one newspaper article, which looks a bit short and routine. It is my understanding that diplomats/ambassadors do not auto pass WP:NPOL or WP:ANYBIO. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Not convinced of notability here. I don't think that everyone who has been stripped of their knighthood is notable enough. BangJan1999 21:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (The page previously used British-era texts which I removed as per the consensus for Raj-era sources. Now the page has been renamed as the "Pothohar Sultanate" which seems to be an entirely fictional title as a search on Google Scholar, JSTOR, Books etc shows that no such polity by that name has ever existed. For this reason, as the article's name is completely fictional and the article is unsourced, I propose that it be deleted. Ixudi (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (An article on an actress, created by an WP:SPA, that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG. Looking at her credits, she has largely had extremely minor roles, appearing mainly as unnamed bit-parts (i.e. "Student", "Reporter", etc). The only appearance of any note at all that I can find is as a reoccurring role in The Gorburger Show, but that by itself would not be enough to pass WP:NACTOR. Searches did not turn up any significant coverage in reliable sources on this individual. Rorshacma (talk) 01:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Founder of a non-notable company. Article has been tagged for improvements since 2019 and is largely unsourced. Subject has appeared on Forbes' "30 under 30" list, but I'm not sure if this is enough for establishing notability. CycloneYoristalk! 04:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (A short-serving mayor of a fairly small city. Fails WP:NPOL as not being a "major local political figure who has received significant press coverage". Coverage almost exclusively related to two incidents, one in which she accused another politician of swearing at her, another in which her husband was arrested in a domestic incident. AusLondonder (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Lots and lots of routine match reports and episode summaries, but where are the significant, non-database sources about Michael Dante? Fram (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (The article doesn't cite any sources, and I haven't been able to find anything more than mentions (aside from an interview). toweli (talk) 11:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) ("Advertising or other spam without any relevant or encyclopedic content. "
UPE is extremely likely based on off-wiki evidence that correlates this article to the author responsible for vast majority of authorship on this article.
Sourcing is absolutely terrible and advertorial intents are quite evident. I am not sure if it meets NORG either, although the pure advert nature alone merits a deletion. Graywalls (talk) 12:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources; the sources cited are either paid for, sponsored, or simply briefly mention the subject. GSS💬 13:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 3 d) (Article about a political figure, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL. The main notability claim here is that he served on the municipal council of a mid-sized suburban city, which is not "inherently" notable -- at the local level of office, the notability test is not passed just by verifying that the person exists, but by writing and sourcing substantial content about his political impact. But while this is at least trying to head in that direction with some statements about specific projects he's been involved in as a councillor, it's completely failing to source them properly: the only two footnotes here are the city's self-published list of its council members on its own website and a book he wrote himself circularly cited as verification of its own existence, neither of which are support for notability. We need to see third-party coverage about his work in sources independent of himself, not stuff he had personal editorial control over. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (Article about a mayor who served for a relatively short term, containing no secondary sources at all. Completely fails WP:BASIC. AusLondonder (talk) 11:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (WP:BLP of a politician, not properly referenced as passing WP:NPOL. As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to have significant reliable source coverage enabling us to write substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. As written, however, this is mainly just background biographical trivia that has nothing to do with establishing notability, and features absolutely none of the type of content that an article about a mayor actually needs to show -- and for sourcing, it's citing a mix of run of the mill verification of his election victories and primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all, with absolutely none of the ongoing "in office" coverage that's required. Chilliwack is a large enough city that its mayors would be eligible to keep substantively written and well-sourced articles that met WP:NPOL #2, but it is in no sense large or significant enough that he would get an automatic notability freebie on an article that's this inadequate. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Poorly-sourced article about a mayor. As always, mayors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just by virtue of existing -- the notability of a mayor hinges on writing and sourcing substantive content about his political impact: specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this is strictly on the level of "Dan Rogers is a mayor who existed, the end", and is "referenced" solely to his "meet your mayor" profile on the self-published website of the city government, which is a primary source that does not support notability at all. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to hand him an automatic inclusion freebie without WP:GNG-worthy coverage. Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Footballer who has played on the Finnish third tier. This not being professional by any means, the BLP needs strong sources to support the counter-intuitive claim that the player has significant coverage (as opposed to WP:ROUTINE/WP:MILL/local news). The two sources from Keski-Uusimaa.fi are paywalled, but look like a match report and a pre-match report respectively. Geschichte (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Article about a mayor, not properly demonstrated as passing WP:NPOL #2. As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to show significant reliable source coverage supporting substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, significant effects their leadership had on the development of the community, and on and so forth. But the bulk of the content here is background biographical trivia that isn't evidence of notability, while his mayoralty is summarily dispatched as "election result, the end" -- and for sourcing, there's one hit of verification of the election results, three primary sources that aren't support for notability, and one book that doesn't cover the subject at all, but is here to tangentially "verify" background information about his ancestors, and fails to even really do that because it contains the surname Ruttan but was published in 1869, and thus obviously fails to name John Ruttan at all for the purposes of properly verifying that he's actually a descendant of any of the Ruttans covered in that book. And even if that were somehow more verifiable than it is, that still wouldn't help to support John Ruttan's notability anyway, since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much more sourcing and substance than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Fails GNG and NEVENT. Nothing found from WP:IS WP:RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Article is sourced mainly from a medieval chronicle. Other sources either fail WP:RS or are brief mentions. Nothing with SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 01:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (The individual's name is currently a red link on Indonesian Wikipedia, indicating a lack of significant coverage as outlined in WP:SIGCOV. While he did serve as the chair of the local ulema council at one point, this appears to be the extent of his notable contributions. It is likely that his recognition is primarily limited to his local region. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 3 d) (Mayor of a small city, does not meet the criteria at WP:NPOL. Sourcing is purely routine local media coverage. AusLondonder (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
Christopher Atamian (New York-based critic, writer, curator, filmmaker and translator)
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Article about a non-notable writer and film-maker who fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG. Possibly WP:UPE. Jamiebuba (talk) 21:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
Mikey Bustos (Filipino-Canadian singer and comedian)
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Deprodded article (Notability concerns, potential self-promotion) hence AfD. As this is just a procedural AfD, I'm neutral as nominator. --Lenticel(talk) 23:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Codest Boi (Nigerian musician and songwriter (born 1995))
AfD (2 k, 5 d) (Fails WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO, sources are mostly music releases, the PM News Nigeria is mediocre. As such, non-notable. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 7 d) (WP:BLP of a politician, not properly referenced as passing WP:NPOL. The attempted notability claim here is that she serves as chair of a British Columbia regional district, which is essentially that province's equivalent to a county council -- but politicians at the local level of office are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to show a significant depth and range of media coverage about their work to demonstrate that they should be seen as special cases of significantly greater notability than the norm for that level of prominence. But this is written more like a résumé than a neutral encyclopedia article, and is "referenced" entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, with not even one hit of WP:GNG-building third party media coverage shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 20:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Sources are basically self-sourced, no longer work with the domain being sold and excluded from Wayback ([5], or newspapers with only a date and no other information. I've searched and can find very little from reliable sources, although his real name did come up a couple of times but just with mentions that he was doing something somewhere. Palta isn't notable and the source doesn't say he's on the board. Not menioned in Shaolin kung fu. Since its creation by "Shaolininfo" it's been edited mainly by Swiss IPs, the latest emailing me to ask why I deleted her edits and saying that "I am the assistant of Master Shi Xing Mi (Walter Gjergja) ". Doug Wellertalk 15:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Where is Kate? (2024 speculation about the health of Catherine, Princess of Wales)
AfD (23 k, 14 d) (I wrote this article and am bringing it to AfD in the hope of garnering community consensus about whether it should exist or not, and am therefore Neutral.
The article discusses recent speculation concerning the health of Catherine, Princess of Wales, which I think has reached sustained media coverage in reliable sources, and indeed, a relevant episode has been in the headlines of British papers today. Yesterday, I was surprised to read that contributing editors to the talk page of Catherine, Princess of Wales seem to have rejected several proposals for a separate article on this topic or inclusion of further media reporting into the article. Some of these discussions were closed by involved editors less than 24 hours after the proposal, which seemed to jump the chance to form community consensus.
These are experienced, good-faith editors with far more experience in WP:BLP and WP:GA than me, so their concerns (which, principally, I suspect are WP:BLP and WP:NOTNEWS), may be valid. On the other hand, the Catherine, Princess of Wales article seems to downplay the speculation entirely, and splits it between the subsections Health and Privacy and the media, and I think that has some WP:NPOV concerns, which of course, Where is Kate? also has (WP:CONTENTFORK). If the article is kept, there is likely a case for renaming, but what to? I defer to the community's judgment. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Wisra Okarianto (Indonesian Islamic judge and civil servant (born 1971)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The individual serves as a government official within a third-level subdivision of Indonesia. The primary references in the article primarily revolve around his regional responsibilities and engagements, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC. Alternatively, some references focus on his familial relations, which do not contribute to the notability of the article per WP:INVALIDBIO. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Muhammad Yahman (Indonesian preacher and teacher (born 1968))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (The individual's name appears as a red link on Indonesian Wikipedia, indicating a lack of significant coverage as stipulated by WP:SIGCOV. Being a local preacher, it's probable that his recognition is confined to his immediate region. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NLIST, almost exclusively unsourced list of non-notable mayors of fairly small city. AusLondonder (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about a headteacher and classicist, and added a passing reference in the local paper. I cannot see coverage to meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NAUTHOR. Tacyarg (talk) 11:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Despite having achieved two medals, I couldn't find enough significant coverage of this bobsleigh athlete that would meet WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Everything that came up in my searches are brief mentions (TVP Sport and Wrocław Naszemiasto), as well as silly, random namesakes. Corresponding article on Polish Wikipedia article has been tagged for not having sources except external links for 14 years; no major edits since 2022. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
Andris Wasono (Indonesian civil servant (born 1976))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:BASIC. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable BPL. Proposed for PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock) Ckfasdf (talk) 06:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Peter Nguyen Van Hung (Vietnamese Australian Catholic priest and human rights activist (born 1958))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Possible cross-wiki spam, noticed some 15 years ago already. I don't see notability; he is an activist but without major achievements. Nadzik (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I didn't find sufficient sources through a WP:BEFORE which went into significant detail to pass WP:GNG. While he was the lead in Worst Year of My Life Again I don't think he passes WP:NACTOR as he hasn't had multiple significant roles. A possible redirect could be to Worst Year of My Life Again. Suonii180 (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Douglas Kim (Korean-American poker player (born 1983))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. His only fame is as poker player during the World Series of Poker in 2006. Does not have further poker career and the article only focuses mostly his involvement in the incel ideology within the Asian American community, with no references. Toadboy123 (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Brant Gardner (Mormon apologist and mesoamericanist)
AfD (2 k, 6 d) (I think that if this person is notable it is because of his apologetics and the books that he has authored. The fact that he has done graduate work in Mesoamerican studies likely gains him credence with his faith community, but he certainly does not pass WP:NACADEMIC, so I don't think we would argue that his notability derives from that. He may be fairly famous within Mormon circles, but I am having a hard time seeing anyone notice his apologetics outside of those circles. This is not the same thing as a William Lane Craig, e.g. This is a fairly obscure apologist whose work is lauded mostly on the basis of the ongoing vain hope of believers that there will be evidence discovered to confirm that the Book of Mormon is historical fact. jps (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Alvino Kusumabrata (Indonesian journalist, writer, and painter (born 2004))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:JOURNALIST. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable BPL. Proposed for PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock) Ckfasdf (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 7 d) (Just as non-notable per WP:BIO as he was two weeks ago, but as an obvious sock/meatpuppet has removed the db-repost speedy tag, here it is again at AFD. Article creator never responded to questions about use of multiple accounts at their user talk page. Perhaps this AFD will end quickly with a db-repost, once the two accounts have been blocked for sockpuppetry. In the meantime, a WP:BEFORE search turns up only the same gushing paid puff pieces, primary sources (such as interviews), and passing mentions. Wikishovel (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The available sources include passing mentions, interviews, and profiles, although some lack reliability. Notably, there's insufficient substantial coverage from reputable third-party sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Consequently, it fails to meet the criteria set forth in WP:GNG and WP:BIO. It's crucial to remember that notability isn't inherited, meaning that having notable clients doesn't automatically confer notability. GSS💬 04:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (I can't find any reasonable purpose for a standalone article. I noticed this could be vandalism since the parenthesis isn't movable except by an admin. Well, I can't find sources which didn't provide me enough reasons to be inclusive. Fails WP: GNG. The founding company doesn't seem to be notable or reach any WP: ORG and some of not all seems to base on the company and not the subject (there could be mentions) but still Notability is not inherited. While I believe Notability is not permanent, The young subject can be notable in the future All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 07:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Fails NACADEMIC. No independent reliable sources to demonstrate notability. 2 of the 4 current sources are quasi-self-published (academic bios from his employers). Several non-independent sources used in the article, e.g. an award granted to the subject by the society of which he was president. Overall seems unduly self-serving. Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 17:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Sourcing consists of name drops and Who's Who regarded as unacceptable. Fails WP:BASIC as lacking "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". AusLondonder (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (Fails WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Current sources do not count towards GNG and a BEFORE makes no difference. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, or a vehicle for advertising and showcasing. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Karthik Naralasetty has some sources on his life and company, a 30 under 30 article and some promotional content, he won an award 13 years ago, I don't think it provides SIGCOV or establishes GNG.
I was going to PROD this article until I found that it not only has been PROD'd but has had two previous AFDs, one closed as Delete, the second as No consensus. The article on his company, SocialBlood was Soft Deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialblood. I thought it was time to reexamine this article and consider whether it meets the stricter standards of today's Wikipedia. LizRead!Talk! 01:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (There do not appear to be any source that indicate this musician is worth to attention. The reliability of source 1 is unknown and the website does not adequately describe the musician. Source 2 is his band's website. Source 3 and 4 basically mention him by name only. 日期20220626 (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The article is titled as if it is about a topic. It's just a list of members without any real context as to why the members are notable or what the purpose of the society is. Shadow311 (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not seeing indicia of encyclopedic notability. Subject seems to be a fairly run-of-the-mill computer scientist who had a leading position in some non-notable conferences. Since its creation in 2007, the article has never had any independent citations. BD2412T 17:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
Sophie Kovic (Entrepreneur and social media personality)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:GNG, and Seed & Sprout fails WP:NCORP. Non-notable awards and local interviews are the only coverage. ~ A412talk! 17:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (One of many "Occupation: Relative" Wiki entries that got created back in the day—even his granddaughter Stella had a page at one point—but somehow it got overlooked when these sort of trivialities were being purged by the numbers. Subject was never covered in the mass media and had no public career to speak of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yours6700 (talk • contribs) 20:34, March 14, 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Little on the page to suggest this cleric meets the inclusion standards. Middle ranking Anglican clerics do not have assumed notability JMWt (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (As far as I can tell, this is just some guy that somebody knew in their community. Absolutely does not pass WP:CREATIVE. A lot of the language is biased and speaks on a personal level about Shainblum rather than an overview of any specific accomplishments. A lot of this article talks about art, and yet he's never sold a painting, been in a gallery, nothing. The teaching piece isn't notable either.OsmiumGuard (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 4 d) (Fails WP:NBIO, no reliable sources that focus primarily on the subject outside of irrelevant football baseball signings. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (The article previously underwent AfD discussions in July-August 2023, resulting in a "soft delete" and subsequent deletion. However, it was recreated in November 2023 by the same article creator, who was confirmed as a sockpuppet. Despite its recreation, the current version of the article remains similar to its previous iteration from July 2023. Consequently, the arguments presented during the previous AfD remain applicable, highlighting the article's failure to meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are OBITs with all the normal problems. BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-15
Yuan Yuan (actor) (Chinese actor, director and producer (born 1953))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (The article (more of a filmography list) has no inline citation. Has no corresponding article in any other wiki (rare for a foreign actor). Has one generic external link reference. The majority of the roles played by the actor were minor and were part of mostly non-notable works. I was unable to find any significant in-depth coverage from reliable publications (in English) that warrants GNG or WP:NACTOR. If anyone's able to find sources in foreign languages, please list them. X (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This article about Vinheteiro fails to meet WP:NMUSIC.
Details about Vinheteiro in the article are not cited in accordance with source, which makes it seem to have reach the requirement of WP:NMUSICe.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro participated in Brazilian programs such as Jornal Nacional (seems to meet criteria 12), while the source 'Jornal Nacional' was about his video of playing of JN's theme song went viral.
e.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro performed in China with local musicians (seems to meet criteria 4), yet the source was about his videos' popularity on Chinese online video platform, Bilibili, where he launched online music courses.
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NOLY or any other pertinent category, came 9th in only race participated in. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
Jackie Adedeji (British television presenter and journalist)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a journalist and podcaster, not properly referenced as passing notability standards for journalists or podcasters. As always, journalists are not "inherently" notable just because content they created exists, and the notability test hinges on the reception of significant third-party coverage about them and their work -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that were self-published by companies or organizations she was directly affiliated with (e.g. documentary films that she appeared in "sourced" to their own presence on a streaming platform rather than media coverage about the films, podcast directories, etc.) or glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage that isn't about her (e.g. her name getting briefly mentioned in coverage whose primary subject is the celebrities who were on her podcast rather than her). There's only one footnote here, #6, that actually represents coverage about her in a WP:GNG-worthy source, and that isn't enough by itself. Bearcat (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Cannot find any contemproray references online - although there may be some in untranslated chinese. He does not appear in a search of the English language website of the Chingqing medical hospital. I appreciate that his page may need to stay in Wikipedia because of his academic reputation - but I cannot find any sources to justify the statements about his reputation made in the article. Newhaven lad (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (There are insufficient notable secondary sources that describe the subject of this article. Most of the notable sources describe the event with the New York Times, but that single event is not notable. Most of the individual's notability comes from his own publications, but Wikipedia requires notable secondary sources. Waters.Justin (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 0 d) (It's a person who became a teacher then a headteacher. I see that there is an entry in an Australian biographical dictionary but I'm not really seeing what the claim to notability is in terms of the en.wiki inclusion criteria. JMWt (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 3 d) (Non-notable political candidate. Doesn't seem like he's gotten much news coverage outside of routine coverage of his Senate campaigns. I would support a redirect to 2024 United States Senate election in Ohio. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Nominating this page for deletion again because it has remained overtly promotional and lacks merit of its own. In the last deletion discussion, some IDs might have been paid to submit a keep vote. Several of those accounts are either banned or inactive now. Notedolly2 (talk) 07:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Consistent target of the Robertbenjamin UPE sock farm. Of the sources present in the article, 1 and 2 are brief mentions, and 3 is a book from a self-publishing source so is not reliable. While the name is relatively common, I did run searches with several permutations of words related to the Beatles and the name of the podcast to narrow it down, and still cannot find sufficient reference material about this subject to indicate notability. SeraphimbladeTalk to me 23:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Article about a hospital radio presenter created originally by a COI editor and filled with unencyclopedic trivia. Nothing of note here other than routine local human-interest news coverage of the presenter. WP:BEFORE reveals no rich untapped seam of coverage of the individual. Flip Format (talk) 21:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Subject fails WP:GNG, WP:NMMA and WP:NBOX. Not having WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS, WP:RS where by the subject is talk about i length and in dept and not passing mentioned for WP:V. Sources talking about announcements and results of fights are considered routing report and can not be contribute to the subject notability. Cassiopeiatalk 23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG. Sources are bunches of unreliable, paid puffery, interviews, passing mentions, which can not align with WP:BLP. Non-notable entity. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (Unable to find sources meeting WP:GNG or WP:NBIO, (in particular, we are lacking in significant coverage) there may be something meeting WP:NACADEMIC but I have not been able to find it. Page sources mostly amount to profile pages, interviews & unreliable sources (Metro, Medium) ASUKITE 14:44, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG. Sources are either passing mentions, dependent, or primary. BEFORE makes no difference. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (All the sources given are primary sources from the subject's organisation, except for a mention in a local newspaper I am unable to verify. Gerstenberger's opinion is also cited in this CBC article as one of a plethora of Hamilton residents' comments on steel production. However, in my opinion neither of these secondary sources are notable mentions, and Gerstenberger's role as president of a local union and minor communist party do not seem to be notable enough on their own. Yue🌙 04:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (WP:BLP of a politician, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL. The notability claims here are as a youth political organizer and as yet unelected candidate in a future election, neither of which are grounds for a Wikipedia article per se -- the notability test at NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one -- but the referencing is almost entirely to primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things, which are not support for notability, and the one hit of media coverage about him winning a primary to contest the future election is not by itself enough to make him more special than all the other unelected candidates in the country who aren't getting articles on that basis. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the fall if he wins the seat, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to already get him an article now. Bearcat (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This was nominated for deletion last month however this was kept, not sure why.. maybe because the nom was sock? anyways, this one is clearly promotional BLP about a non-notable advocate. as mentioned in the previous nom, there is no reference that is directly about him. Fails WP:GNG. Saqib (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-17
Danish Ali (Pakistani stand-up comedian and writer)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I nominated it for deletion back in 2023 i guess but it was kept, but i feel like it still doesn't meet GNG so nominating it again. Most of the cited sources either do not meet WP:RS or are trivial mentions. Saqib (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (He doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG independent of the band. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Suburban Legends, but could overpower that article, and no referenced info to merge. Boleyn (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-17
Ramm Bogadi (Indian actor and YouTube travel vlogger)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No evidence of notability. Sources are generally trivial or from social media or IMDB. Draftified twice to allow improvements to be made but returned to mainspace immediately by its author. No evidence for WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 15:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Flaccus, the slave of someone named Claudius, provided musical accompaniment on the tibia to each of the plays of Terence when they were originally produced, and nothing else will ever be known about him. He has no notability independent of Terence, and does not merit an entry of his own in either the Oxford Classical Dictionary or Grove Music Online. Anything that can be written about him belongs at Terence or the articles on each of his six plays. Cal Engime (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. No indication of significance. Previous deleted on 21 January 2024. scope_creepTalk 19:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Seems to fail WP:GNG, there are some announcements kind of sources, routine coverage and non-independent interview, but I fail to see any real independent SIGCOV about the person. Tehonk (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG, current sources do not help towards WP:BLP and a BEFORE also suggests they're non-notable. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Does not appear to pass WP:GNG based on sources in article and search of Newspapers.com. Most of the sources in the article are passing mentions and the only significant coverage is from questionable sources. Additionally, the only significant contributors to the page ([6]) appear to be users with conflicts of interest. Eagles24/7(C) 23:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NBIO, apparently the creator is the subject of the article. Awards don't appear to sufficient for notability. IgelRM (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (I don't see how this article doesn't violate WP:SYNTHESIS. Ignoring the blatant MOS:ACCESS issues with the tables (which I could address), these tables constitute original research and an assemblage of indiscriminate statistics. The very first table, for example, simply shows that Russia has won a gold medal in each of the listed events, but not how many, and then an unsourced total on the right column. Additionally, synchronized skating is (unfortunately) a separate entity from other figure skating disciplines. This is another example of someone treating Wikipedia like a figure skating fan wiki. Bgsu98(Talk) 00:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-17
Ali al-Jarrah (Lebanese man accused of spying on Israel (born 1958))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (As noted by another user, coverage does not extend beyond arrest and legal consequences. Significant coverage implies that the subject has been featured in multiple sources over a period of time, contributing to a well-rounded biography.)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Tagged since 2022, appears to be an autobiography created by a SPA on both trwiki and here. Also tagged there. Fails WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Tehonk (talk) 01:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Fails WP:POLITICIAN for the lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. There is no reference to winning an election or being in a position of power in another party to qualify as a political activist WP:POLITICIAN ~ Spworld2 (talk) 10:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 4 d) (Associate prof, some early career awards, decent number of citations but perhaps not especially high. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROF. Might be WP:TOOSOON or WP:MILL. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 2 d) (Fails WP: GNG and WP: SIGCOV. There were questionable sources cited and they neither say why the article is notable. Otuọcha (talk) 09:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 3 d) (Spam. After the article of Claudia Letizia in Italian Wikipedia has been deleted, the author of the Italian article created articles of Claudia Letizia on 30+ Wikipedias. @Giammarco Ferrari: Please explain the detailed situation if you can. SanmosaOutdia 00:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (non-notable per WP:NPROF, and does not seem to be meeting WP:GNG. Mentions in secondary source such as Indian Express are running.
Also,
Chairs/Positions held are non-notable, with multiple department heads/chairs in a single university, mostly on a rotational basis.
Publications are journals and chapters(as done by virtually all professors), not full books.
Secretary position in said society is below president, and is organisational in nature. User4edits (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 3 d) (This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. WP:BEFORE does not call up any RS for this artist. I am not finding any sources for claims of being in collections. The article, as currently written, has 4 dead links. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (WP:BLP of an artist, not properly referenced as passing WP:NARTIST. The main notability claim here is that she and her work exist, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient third-party coverage about her and her work to clear WP:GNG -- but three of the four footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the fourth is a single deadlinked newspaper article of purely local interest in the local newspaper of the city where she was living at the time, which is not enough to get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only reliable source in the mix. Additionally, this has recently undergone several days of vandalism by an anonymous IP who persistently blanked large portions of it, generally with claims that the stuff they were removing was "incorrect", but the quality of the referencing is so poor that I can't even sort out what's correct or not in the first place — none of the sourcing confirms any of the disputed facts, but none of it contradicts them either — and the IP may possibly have a conflict of interest to boot. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on her sourceability. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Google search results are drowned out by results about Hava Nagila. Does not appear to have significant coverage from secondary sources.
May be notable from chart placements as lead or featured artists. Schrödinger's jellyfish✉ 17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This page was previously deleted in 2018 through the AFD process, but was recreated in 2021. However, it appears that the subject of the article still lacks notability on their own, as the positions mentioned in the infobox and lead are not considered notable. Additionally, the article violates Wikipedia's policy on WP:NPOV, and it's important to note that notability is not inherited. Saqib (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (The individual in question serves as a government official in a third-level subdivision of Indonesia. The majority of references in her article pertain to her work within her region, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC. Additionally, her designation as a lecturer potentially qualifies her as an academic, yet fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:NACADEMIC. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Notability only through her sons, and WP:NOTINHERITED. Present on 2 other projects, but they are entitled to make different decision. There is some evidence of being a benefactor (supporting the local parish), but that itself was inherited. The pages of Wilhelm and Alexander seem sufficiently well-developed that a merge wouldn't be helpful. Klbrain (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
This article is a paid work by an editor who is being compensated by the subject. A draft has been created, Draft:Paloma Aguirre, which was declined twice, once for sourcing issues, once for tone issues. The author then created this article, which is the same as the draft, in article space. This bypassed AFC review, and bypassing AFC review is permitted except for paid editors. Review of the sources shows that this article does not establish biographical notability. Only the first reference is independent. The first reference, a newspaper account of her election, is a good source. The other four sources are associated with the subject or with organizations with which she is associated:
So this article can be deleted, at least for now, rather than being reviewed and sanitized due to the conflict of interest, and the draft can be left for improvement. This does not mean that she is not notable, or that she is notable, but that the article does not establish notability, and so the questions of tone and neutrality do not need to be addressed. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (There is a lack of substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources that discuss the subject in depth. The current cited sources include passing mentions, a contributor piece, and an announcement of her inclusion in the 100 Women of Influence 2016 list, which does not automatically confer notability. Although a Google news search yielded some sources, they primarily consist of passing mentions or self-published materials, none of which establish independent notability. GSS💬 16:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (9 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Yes there are a couple of obituaries here but it appears that only one of her books was notable and appears in any libraries. They may be notable one day but right now it's WP:TOOSOON𝔓420°𝔓Holla 11:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (This article is about the mother of Elaine and Angela Chao. Though the article itself appears fleshed out and well-sourced at first glance, taking some time to read through it, I call into question whether Ruth is notable per GNG. More than half of the article pertains to her personal life, the events of which are not themselves notable. The only other section, "Philanthropy", includes only buildings named after her posthumously, due to donations from her husband and daughters, including a building at the Harvard Business School.
There are 18 cited sources. Of those, nine are from the HBS website. Two are from the Foremost Group, an organization headed by her daughter Angela. One is a news story covering Angela's death. One is an obituary of her other daughter, Jeannette. Two are Ruth's obituaries - one is clearly just a death announcement. The other is called "Chao's mother mourned", explicitly defining her notability solely in relation to her daughter Elaine. One source is just about Elaine's comments on the Green Line expansion, ten years after Ruth's death. There is one source (#14) honoring Ruth (again, posthumously) and her husband as philanthropists, however this link is defunct. In addition, the source appears to be a press release from the organization that gave them the award. This is a nothing article. Thesixthstaff (talk) 15:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
Siti Zainab (Indonesian actress, singer, dancer, and homemaker (193?–2014))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (The article underwent AfD discussions in July 2023, leading to a "soft delete." However, it was reinstated in December 2023 by the same article creator, confirmed as a sockpuppet. Despite its restoration, the article fails to address the issues that prompted its removal in July 2023, particularly regarding WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Notably, in the Filmography section, nearly all entries list her as uncredited. The one exception where she is credited only features her in a supporting role. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (It's a person who became a teacher then a headteacher. I see that there is an entry in an Australian biographical dictionary but I'm not really seeing what the claim to notability is in terms of the en.wiki inclusion criteria. JMWt (talk) 10:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable, no WP:SIGCOV apart from her coming out of the closet as LGBT. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 07:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Doesn't seem to be a notable individual. Googling her name in both English and Russian yields nothing in the news section. Current sources are in Russian, but Google Translate revealed they are just profiles, unreliable, and have only a couple of passing mentions. GSS💬 13:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Doesn't satisfy even WP:ANYBIO, citations only talk about the fashion week and lack of full coverage for the subject. Htanaungg (talk) 03:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not notable due to WP:BLP1E and note that the other winners of Mrs. World do not have their own page, so precedent shows that there is no basis for creating a Wikipedia page just for women winning one low-profile marital pageant and doing nothing else with their reign. Fixthetyp0 (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. None of the sources in the article are independent of the subject, or SIGCOV for that matter, and I was unable to find any SIGCOV during a search. The best that I could find was an interview from 2018 that didn't contain any independent prose from the author, who also states that she has collaborated with the subject in the past. Alvaldi (talk) 14:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-17
Jana Pareigis (German journalist and television moderator)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No independent sources - Altenmann>talk 22:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (Last AfD was no consensus due to low participation. 1st AfD a weak keep with low participation in 2008, when standards were lower. I couldn't establish that he meets WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, or a good WP:ATD. It has been in CAT:NN for 14 years; hopefully we can now resolve it one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Unfortunately seems to be a non-notable event backed up by just a single secondary source from Slate -- no independent third-party coverage apart from that (I was unable to find anything meaningful myself). The rest of the article is just spun off from primary sources. KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬 21:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (There are not enough secondary sources about this person for this page to pass general notability guidelines. Bolt and Thunder (talk) 22:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article is mainly promotional in nature, cites the subject's press release as a source, and arguably violates TOU per maintenance tag. Any truly notable material can easily be merged into similar articles. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (This article has been limping along for years as a perma-stub, and in that time only one citation to a reliable source that is independent from the subject has been found: Kinna 2012, p. 357 (this source provides only a single sentence of information about it, in a long list of other organisations). Looking through Google Scholar,[7] I haven't been able to find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Most of the sources found are from members of the organisation (i.e. Tom Wetzel), or authors connected directly to the organisation (i.e. Workers' Solidarity Movement) or are false positives (i.e. Emma Goldman). Others only provide passing mentions to the WSA, in longer lists of other organisations (i.e. Gustavo Rodriguez, Robert Hlatky).
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (sourcing is very minor (mention in news site, a book, and a newspaper), and the roles in movies aren't meeting notability. She wasafairy 21:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-03
Henrybuilt (American design and manufacturing company)
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Realtively small company making kitchens and furniture with no particularly notable features. No obvious ways of linking to other Wikipedia pages Newhaven lad (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Redirect undone. Actor appearing in a early 1990s' video and that's pretty much it. WP:NOTINHERITED and fails WP:NACTOR. I suggest reinstating the redirect to song "No Rain", the video in which she appeared. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 04:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 3 d) (Spam. After the article of Claudia Letizia in Italian Wikipedia has been deleted, the author of the Italian article created articles of Claudia Letizia on 30+ Wikipedias. @Giammarco Ferrari: Please explain the detailed situation if you can. SanmosaOutdia 00:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not "inherently" notable just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of third-party reliable sources covering and analyzing their work -- but after stripping numerous unacceptable sources of the "film sourced to its own directory entry in IMDb" variety (which is not support for notability at all), what's left is one unreliable source reporting that he won an award at a minor local film festival that isn't prominent enough to clinch "notability because award" -- that's looking for major film festivals like Cannes, Berlin, Venice, TIFF or Sundance whose award announcements get covered as news, not just any film festival that exists on the planet -- and one film review in a source that's fine for use but not widely distributed enough to get him or the film over GNG all by itself. In fact, the film's article got draftspaced last year for lacking properly substantiated evidence of notability over and above the same single film review, and then got deleted as a stale draft without ever seeing any further improvement. The two films I've bundled here are also both referenced entirely to primary sources rather than reliable or notability-building ones. There's one film, Roobha, that I'm not bundling, as it actually does have reliable sources present in it — but it's still not at all clear that it has enough sourcing to clear the bar, so no prejudice against somebody else listing it for a separate AFD discussion in the future. Nothing present in any of these articles is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be referenced better than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This is a resume, not an article with reliable sources and significant coverage to demonstrate notability. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (There are no citations in this article, and I can't find anything on the internet about this language besides papers from the authors. Those papers have a combined total of less than 100 citations. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Sci-fi book series. Sadly (I liked this in my younger days...) this article seems to fail WP:GNG. Unreferenced too. My BEFORE fails to find anything. ISFDb lists only one review for first and third book in the series ([8]) so it may be hard to even try to argue that book reviews for individual books here might save this. In either case, what we have is just a plot summary with some old and unreferenced fan speculation about the series' future. Per WP:ATD-R, this can be redirected to the author's bio, where the series is mentioned (or maybe better, to John Ringo bibliography). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
Conjoined Queens (8th episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
Prancing Queens (10th episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
The DESPY Awards (5th episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:NOTGUIDE applies here. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. Also, all but one are unsourced. SpacedFarmer (talk) 10:33, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (The article doesn't cite any sources, and I haven't been able to find anything more than mentions (aside from an interview). toweli (talk) 11:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Mikey Bustos (Filipino-Canadian singer and comedian)
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Deprodded article (Notability concerns, potential self-promotion) hence AfD. As this is just a procedural AfD, I'm neutral as nominator. --Lenticel(talk) 23:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Northern Press (News publisher based in Northern Uganda)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:ORGCRIT, non-notable periodical published by non-notable journalist who fails GNG. Official website looks like a free web host. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Where is Kate? (2024 speculation about the health of Catherine, Princess of Wales)
AfD (23 k, 14 d) (I wrote this article and am bringing it to AfD in the hope of garnering community consensus about whether it should exist or not, and am therefore Neutral.
The article discusses recent speculation concerning the health of Catherine, Princess of Wales, which I think has reached sustained media coverage in reliable sources, and indeed, a relevant episode has been in the headlines of British papers today. Yesterday, I was surprised to read that contributing editors to the talk page of Catherine, Princess of Wales seem to have rejected several proposals for a separate article on this topic or inclusion of further media reporting into the article. Some of these discussions were closed by involved editors less than 24 hours after the proposal, which seemed to jump the chance to form community consensus.
These are experienced, good-faith editors with far more experience in WP:BLP and WP:GA than me, so their concerns (which, principally, I suspect are WP:BLP and WP:NOTNEWS), may be valid. On the other hand, the Catherine, Princess of Wales article seems to downplay the speculation entirely, and splits it between the subsections Health and Privacy and the media, and I think that has some WP:NPOV concerns, which of course, Where is Kate? also has (WP:CONTENTFORK). If the article is kept, there is likely a case for renaming, but what to? I defer to the community's judgment. IgnatiusofLondon (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable amateur/local brass band. I can find nothing to indicate that the subject of this (effectively orphaned) article meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:NBAND. In terms of SIGCOV, and after exhaustive searches (for reliable/independent sources to expand the article beyond the single/primary source we have), the only coverage I can find are passing mentions in regional papers - like these listingsentries in the Belfast Telegraph. And "local interest" stories in similar papers - like this in the News Letter). And passing mentions (in articles about people connected to the subject) - like these onlinepieces in the local news website Northernirelandworld.com. I can find no coverage at all by the BBC or other non-local outlets. Google searches (for various combinations of the subject's name) barely return a few hundred results. Mainly the subject's own website, social channels and this Wikipedia article and its mirrors. That we need to rely entirely on primary sources, to establish even the basic facts, suggests that SIGCOV is not met. The NBAND issues are self evident. This local amateur brass band hasn't charted or released an album on a major label. And coming 2nd in a very specific category in a North of Ireland Bands' Association competition is objectively not success in "a major music award"... I have reviewed possible WP:ATDs. But draftifying this ancient article serves no purpose and I can't recommend redirection anywhere (like to Carrickfergus - as there is no related section and creating one would give UNDUE weight/preference to a single otherwise non-notable local community group). I, frankly, can't fathom why this article was created in the first place. Its original incarnation reads entirely like WP:NOTWEBHOST content.... Guliolopez (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Guliolopez (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This article cites zero sources, and has not since the page started existing in 2016. The subject is about a single character in a niche show that aired on Adult Swim, hardly the notability required of a Wikipedia article. Samoht27 (talk) 06:10, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I didn't find sufficient sources through a WP:BEFORE which went into significant detail to pass WP:GNG. While he was the lead in Worst Year of My Life Again I don't think he passes WP:NACTOR as he hasn't had multiple significant roles. A possible redirect could be to Worst Year of My Life Again. Suonii180 (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Epos Now (Software provider based in Norwich, England)
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (I can't find any reasonable purpose for a standalone article. I noticed this could be vandalism since the parenthesis isn't movable except by an admin. Well, I can't find sources which didn't provide me enough reasons to be inclusive. Fails WP: GNG. The founding company doesn't seem to be notable or reach any WP: ORG and some of not all seems to base on the company and not the subject (there could be mentions) but still Notability is not inherited. While I believe Notability is not permanent, The young subject can be notable in the future All the Best! Otuọcha (talk) 07:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
Hanna Jonasson (Lawyer for Julian Assange and WikiLeaks)
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Subject does not seem notable—all the cited sources do not provide significant coverage, and are instead about Assange, Manning, or Assange's cat. Remsense诉 19:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This doesn't deserve it's own article- It only appeared in five episodes and has no notable significance. I think this article should be deleted. WizardGamer775 (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Not yet notable WP:NACTOR, with only minor roles so far. In a WP:BEFORE search, the only significant coverage I could find was the WDIV-TV source cited, from local television news. Wikishovel (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This article about Vinheteiro fails to meet WP:NMUSIC.
Details about Vinheteiro in the article are not cited in accordance with source, which makes it seem to have reach the requirement of WP:NMUSICe.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro participated in Brazilian programs such as Jornal Nacional (seems to meet criteria 12), while the source 'Jornal Nacional' was about his video of playing of JN's theme song went viral.
e.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro performed in China with local musicians (seems to meet criteria 4), yet the source was about his videos' popularity on Chinese online video platform, Bilibili, where he launched online music courses.
AfD (0 k, 7 d) (Non-notable record label. Fails to meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. I could not find any sources on Google, and nothing has changed since the last AfD. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Possibly fails WP:SIGCOV. Based on the conversation at Talk:Losing Our Sons#Notable?, I am bringing this here. Perhaps others will have better luck finding more references. Either way this has been tagged for notability since 2013 and its time to make a decision one way or the other as a community. 4meter4 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-15
Jackie Adedeji (British television presenter and journalist)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a journalist and podcaster, not properly referenced as passing notability standards for journalists or podcasters. As always, journalists are not "inherently" notable just because content they created exists, and the notability test hinges on the reception of significant third-party coverage about them and their work -- but this is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that were self-published by companies or organizations she was directly affiliated with (e.g. documentary films that she appeared in "sourced" to their own presence on a streaming platform rather than media coverage about the films, podcast directories, etc.) or glancing namechecks of her existence in coverage that isn't about her (e.g. her name getting briefly mentioned in coverage whose primary subject is the celebrities who were on her podcast rather than her). There's only one footnote here, #6, that actually represents coverage about her in a WP:GNG-worthy source, and that isn't enough by itself. Bearcat (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Article about a hospital radio presenter created originally by a COI editor and filled with unencyclopedic trivia. Nothing of note here other than routine local human-interest news coverage of the presenter. WP:BEFORE reveals no rich untapped seam of coverage of the individual. Flip Format (talk) 21:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (While this may be notable (there are some passing references in my GScholar BEFORE), what we have is pure WP:OR - content tagged as unreferenced for over a decade, with no interwikis. It is pretty much orphaned (just two mainspace articles link here) and outside the lead is underlnked This is outside my field of expertise, so I cannot even comment whether what is written about here is related to the uses I see in GScholar. If someone improves this, great, otherwise, a redirect somewhere could be considered as well. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Can't find any additional sources beyond the one in the article. Given the age of the Red Asphalt videos, sources may exist in print, but I cannot speak for certain on that. Either way, doesn't meet GNG as it stands right now. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article recently created by disclosed paid editors from BYU. Despite the extensive references, most scholarship on the Book of Mormon is conducted by Mormons so whether WP:INDY sourcing requirement is met is unclear. For example, Catholicism and Judaism, among others, have produced vast bodies of scholarship on their own religion, but only the clearly notable topics of Catholic canon law or Jewish exegetical literature are summarized here for the non-specialist reader.
While a proposed merge to First Nephi would also have been a reasonable course, I believe a full AfD is more likely to attract more independent comments and form a clearer community consensus. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-17
Ramm Bogadi (Indian actor and YouTube travel vlogger)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No evidence of notability. Sources are generally trivial or from social media or IMDB. Draftified twice to allow improvements to be made but returned to mainspace immediately by its author. No evidence for WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 15:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALIST. Article has many issues with sourcing, very dependent. He works for MFWA, The Fourth Estate, and pieces from thefourthgate are used 10 times in this article. Other pieces are mostly passing mentions, some awards by the organisation he works for, others, non-notable. ModernGhana and newsghana.com.gh are unreliable publications. Thus, non-notable investigative journalist. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NBIO, apparently the creator is the subject of the article. Awards don't appear to sufficient for notability. IgelRM (talk) 10:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Collection of text summarized from pages on the constituent novels and the references only concern individual books. Fails WP:GNG, WP:NBOOK, and WP:BKD, does not provide the reader with anything that could not be gleaned almost as easily from just a directory of wikilinks to the existing pages. Orchastrattor (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (Like many 'in fiction' and like topics, there is a chance this is a notable topic (a good one, given sources like [9]). Unfortunately, our current execution is simply terrible. Just three footnotes. A WP:OR prose opening with no source, followed by a gigantic list of random works that mention this topic that fails WP:IPC/MOS:TRIVIA. This needs to be rewritten from scratch, as nothing here is rescuable, or in other words, this merits a WP:TNT treatment, although a WP:ATD-R alternative is to redirect this to Tachyon#In_fiction, from which it was spun long time ago. The short section there is at least referenced, if poorly - but still better than what we have here. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (This article fails notability guidelines as per WP:CREATIVE and was published by another editor after failed attempts by the subject to create a promotional autobiography. Redtree21 (talk) 03:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Searched and found no additional reliable sources to support notability. Appears non-notable. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 03:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (18 years with only primary sources. This character isn't notable and should be redirected Big Money Threepwood (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Incoherent start/stub article with a references list that despite its surface impressiveness doesn’t seem to demonstrate notability. While I personally agree completely with the sentiments expressed, it’s quite unclear that it passes encyclopedic muster, in my opinion. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 09:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (Like many 'in fiction' and like topics, there is a chance this is a notable topic (a good one, given sources like [10]). Unfortunately, our current execution is simply terrible. Just three footnotes. A WP:OR prose opening with no source, followed by a gigantic list of random works that mention this topic that fails WP:IPC/MOS:TRIVIA. This needs to be rewritten from scratch, as nothing here is rescuable, or in other words, this merits a WP:TNT treatment, although a WP:ATD-R alternative is to redirect this to Tachyon#In_fiction, from which it was spun long time ago. The short section there is at least referenced, if poorly - but still better than what we have here. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Lots and lots of routine match reports and episode summaries, but where are the significant, non-database sources about Michael Dante? Fram (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Kept at previous AfD based in part due to conduct of nom, this company does not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Zero secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (Fails WP:GNG. Tag and Prod challenged by IP so here now at AfD. CNMall41 (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Douglas Kim (Korean-American poker player (born 1983))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. His only fame is as poker player during the World Series of Poker in 2006. Does not have further poker career and the article only focuses mostly his involvement in the incel ideology within the Asian American community, with no references. Toadboy123 (talk) 13:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly referenced as passing notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work -- but this article was "sourced" predominantly to IMDb and his own LinkedIn and streaming copies of his films on YouTube, which are not support for notability, and even the three footnotes I didn't strip are still primary sources that still aren't support for notability, with not even one hit of GNG-worthy third-party coverage shown. And the closest thing to a notability claim is that he won a minor local-interest award that isn't prominent enough to clinch passage of WP:ANYBIO all by itself. The notability test on Wikipedia, as always, doesn't hinge on saying that he did stuff -- it hinges on the amount of media coverage that he did or didn't get for doing stuff, and nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not "inherently" notable just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of third-party reliable sources covering and analyzing their work -- but after stripping numerous unacceptable sources of the "film sourced to its own directory entry in IMDb" variety (which is not support for notability at all), what's left is one unreliable source reporting that he won an award at a minor local film festival that isn't prominent enough to clinch "notability because award" -- that's looking for major film festivals like Cannes, Berlin, Venice, TIFF or Sundance whose award announcements get covered as news, not just any film festival that exists on the planet -- and one film review in a source that's fine for use but not widely distributed enough to get him or the film over GNG all by itself. In fact, the film's article got draftspaced last year for lacking properly substantiated evidence of notability over and above the same single film review, and then got deleted as a stale draft without ever seeing any further improvement. The two films I've bundled here are also both referenced entirely to primary sources rather than reliable or notability-building ones. There's one film, Roobha, that I'm not bundling, as it actually does have reliable sources present in it — but it's still not at all clear that it has enough sourcing to clear the bar, so no prejudice against somebody else listing it for a separate AFD discussion in the future. Nothing present in any of these articles is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be referenced better than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not "inherently" notable just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of third-party reliable sources covering and analyzing their work -- but after stripping numerous unacceptable sources of the "film sourced to its own directory entry in IMDb" variety (which is not support for notability at all), what's left is one unreliable source reporting that he won an award at a minor local film festival that isn't prominent enough to clinch "notability because award" -- that's looking for major film festivals like Cannes, Berlin, Venice, TIFF or Sundance whose award announcements get covered as news, not just any film festival that exists on the planet -- and one film review in a source that's fine for use but not widely distributed enough to get him or the film over GNG all by itself. In fact, the film's article got draftspaced last year for lacking properly substantiated evidence of notability over and above the same single film review, and then got deleted as a stale draft without ever seeing any further improvement. The two films I've bundled here are also both referenced entirely to primary sources rather than reliable or notability-building ones. There's one film, Roobha, that I'm not bundling, as it actually does have reliable sources present in it — but it's still not at all clear that it has enough sourcing to clear the bar, so no prejudice against somebody else listing it for a separate AFD discussion in the future. Nothing present in any of these articles is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be referenced better than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Unsourced list of unclear necessity. Standard practice of WikiProject Film is that a country gets one base list of its films first, with separate by-year lists spun off only when that base list has become too large and needs to be chunked out for size management purposes -- but specifically in 2014, one user undertook a misguided project of creating standalone "list of country films of 2014" for every single country where they could find even one film to list, which has never otherwise been done for any other year before or since. But this is a list of just one film that doesn't even have an article to link to, and San Marino doesn't even have a base list at all -- it's such a small country that it's deeply unlikely to have any significant film industry of its own, and is likely at best an annex to the Italian film industry (even the one film listed here is tagged by IMDb as a San Marino-Italy coprod), so that we don't even have a Cinema of San Marino overview, or a Category:Sammarinese films category, either. So no prejudice against the creation of List of Sammarinese films if somebody with some knowledge of the subject can be arsed to find more than one film to list in it, but we don't need a 2014-specific list, and with just one unlinked film here I can't mentally justify moving this to the general title myself if I can't find any other films to add to it. Bearcat (talk) 14:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (A list containing just one film, which does not have an article. No sources, just a IMDb external link which is useless. AusLondonder (talk) 17:57, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (A list containing just three films, none of which have articles. References section is empty. Does not meet WP:NLISTAusLondonder (talk) 08:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The film is obscure, undersourced and fails WP:NFILM. In fact the producer's son said, "even I don’t remember much of that film". Kailash29792(talk) 04:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Normally I would redirect this article to List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters, but I do not think that would be appropriate because not only does the single source only mention this character in passing, but the article itself mentions more than one possible name for the character. Erpertblah, blah, blah... 12:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (As it stands this film holds no current plans to resume production in the near future, thus no longer satisfying WP:NFF. The film's production history is not extensive enough to me to merit exemption ala Akira (planned film). I attempted restoration back to draftspace to hold it, this was refused so now I must pursue deletion. NFF not satisfied, no guarantee for it to even be revisited, production history not extensive. This does not pass muster for mainspace. Rusted AutoParts 02:17, 18 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Non-notable band. No coverage in RS, also by NEXIST. Promotional writeup. Circular sourcing, for example here: On June 11, 2012, it was announced on the band's Facebook page that the band has decided to record a new album., i.e. the band member(s) make "announcements" on FB then quote themselves on WP. Has already twice been deleted at Hewiki. No updates since 2013. gidonb (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article about a band, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The principal attempt at a notability claim here is that they had "one notable radio hit", but without any attempt at sourcing that the song was ever actually a hit -- NMUSIC #2 looking for IFPI-certified national pop charts on the order of Billboard, while music publicity mavens tend to indiscriminately attach the word "hit" to any song that ever got played on any radio station at all, so a song isn't automatically a notability-clinching "hit" just because you call it one without proper sourcing for that. But there's no other strong notability claim here at all, the referencing is entirely to (deadlinked) primary sourcing and blogs that aren't support for notability without a shred of WP:GNG-building coverage about them shown, and the article has been flagged as needing better referencing since 2010 without improvement. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 14:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Nominating on behalf of an IP who made a request at WT:AFD which says: This article needs to be nominated for deletion. It cites no sources (despite being tagged for a decade now), and the subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Shock were a short-lived British dance troupe from the early 80s, but were never famous in their own right. They were known only by association. They released two singles, neither of which charted. Their former members are not prominent or widely known beyond this troupe. CycloneYoristalk! 08:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Draft that was declined and eventually deleted. User requested undeletion to improve it and instead simply removed the decline notice and moved the draft to articlespace. Fails WP:NBIO. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 15:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
Abi Carter (American singer-songwriter (born 1997))
AfD (2 k, 4 d) (Coverage does not go "beyond the context of a single event" per WP:NOTWHOSWHO, in this case, one audition on one episode of a reality show (an extremely minor "event"). Even if coverage continues in the future it is highly unlikely to warrant more than some sentences at American Idol (season 22). Heartfox (talk) 05:57, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This album was claimed to be borderline notable by Amakuru at WP:RM/TR#Contested technical requests. Despite that, I am now sure whether this album actually meets WP:NALBUM, so I am sending it to AfD to determine notability. GTrang (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Non-notable band, unsourced since ever. I would PROD but an IP just started editing it again (which is why I remembered it existed) and would likely be a waste of time. Primefac (talk) 12:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Google search results are drowned out by results about Hava Nagila. Does not appear to have significant coverage from secondary sources.
May be notable from chart placements as lead or featured artists. Schrödinger's jellyfish✉ 17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Starting a formal AfD as an editor objects to this article being a redirect. This group's claim to fame is their Eurovision Song Contest 2016 appearance, and all references included in the article and through an internet search appear to pertain to that appearance. Per WP:ONEEVENT, I propose a redirect to Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2016, which is a good article and includes all notable endeavors by this group in greater detail and with additional context. Grk1011 (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Subject fails WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. Of the five citations listed, the two PRP cites and both the substream and mosh cites uncritically republish the band's PR, with long quotation from one of the band members. Wikipedia could wait until the album actually comes out. Efforts to redirect this have failed. For me, I'd need to see cites from Blabbermouth and NME to think there's any general notability here. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 5 d) (Appears to be a non-notable band that doesn't pass WP:NBAND. Lot of non-neutral puffery and a before search didn't turn up enough to convince me that they're notable. Article was also created by Michaelxcrusty, who appears to be a member of the band based on the members listed. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 5 d) (This is just a WP:CATEGORY-like article that will list the three albums of the trilogy. There is nothing in this article that is not already covered in the other two. ℛonherry☘ 18:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (I cannot find any references to the Orchestra after 2012 - and the earlier ones are merely passing references to its existence. Newhaven lad (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (There do not appear to be any source that indicate this musician is worth to attention. The reliability of source 1 is unknown and the website does not adequately describe the musician. Source 2 is his band's website. Source 3 and 4 basically mention him by name only. 日期20220626 (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 4 d) (Fails WP:NBIO, no reliable sources that focus primarily on the subject outside of irrelevant football baseball signings. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Consistent target of the Robertbenjamin UPE sock farm. Of the sources present in the article, 1 and 2 are brief mentions, and 3 is a book from a self-publishing source so is not reliable. While the name is relatively common, I did run searches with several permutations of words related to the Beatles and the name of the podcast to narrow it down, and still cannot find sufficient reference material about this subject to indicate notability. SeraphimbladeTalk to me 23:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (He doesn't seem to meet WP:MUSICBIO / WP:GNG independent of the band. Possible WP:ATD is merge/redirect to Suburban Legends, but could overpower that article, and no referenced info to merge. Boleyn (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Flaccus, the slave of someone named Claudius, provided musical accompaniment on the tibia to each of the plays of Terence when they were originally produced, and nothing else will ever be known about him. He has no notability independent of Terence, and does not merit an entry of his own in either the Oxford Classical Dictionary or Grove Music Online. Anything that can be written about him belongs at Terence or the articles on each of his six plays. Cal Engime (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Does not appear to pass WP:GNG based on sources in article and search of Newspapers.com. Most of the sources in the article are passing mentions and the only significant coverage is from questionable sources. Additionally, the only significant contributors to the page ([11]) appear to be users with conflicts of interest. Eagles24/7(C) 23:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (I have conducted WP:BEFORE search and I am not finding independent coverage beyond La Crosse Tribune local paper, and repeated mentions of "La Crosse Technology's Atomic Digital Alarm Clock with a retail value of $29.95!" in Popular Science magazine. Graywalls (talk) 08:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Insufficient notability, perhaps merge into a Truck Simulator community section? Apart from unreliable Metro, sources appear to be about a community around the game as a whole. IgelRM (talk) 12:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Does not meet WP:ORGCRIT as lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. Lacking any secondary sources at all. AusLondonder (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (An exhaustively in-depth look at the inner workings of a hospital radio station which is sadly almost entirely unencyclopedic and should be kept online somewhere other than Wikipedia. I'm unable to find any meaningful coverage of this radio station to source the article - it looks like mostly WP:OR. Flip Format (talk) 21:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (PROD removed by creator on the basis that "It met the criteria at the time of it's creation". However, radio stations must meet the general notability guideline, requiring "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Lacking any secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 18:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (Fails WP:SUSTAINED. The only two reliable, independent citations are from right when the website was created, and they reek of churnalism. Might be worth a mention on Web Standards Project but doesn't seem to deserve its own page. Apocheir (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP, all citations to otherwise reliable sources read more like press releases or advertising than actual reporting. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Can't find any reliable sources or significant coverage for this piece of software. Doesn't seem to pass WP:NSOFT. Has been marked as not notable since 2010. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 20:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Minor software project whose development appears to have ended around 2009, with the project still in a "pre-alpha" stage, and whose parent project (the Parrot virtual machine) was itself pining for the fjords officially discontinued in 2017. No third-party references in the article, and I wasn't able to find any online either. Omphalographer (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (Only reliable source I could identify is Tiroler Tageszeitung. But the article appears to be about Lyoness, which already had an article at Lyoness although lead states now myWorld. (Speedy deletion was contested) IgelRM (talk) 23:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-03
CurveBall (Web browser security vulnerability on Microsoft Windows 10)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Per WP:NOTNEWS, the last coverage of this particular security exploit was in 2020 and it has effectively been forgotten since. As it currently stands I do not think it is notable enough for a standalone entry. Sohom (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-04
Oniro OS (Family of open-source operating systems based on OpenHarmony)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (There are no sources that would establish notability, and a quick Google search doesn't reveal anything else that could establish notability either. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (All of the references are primary sources. I also can't find any secondary sources that are reliable enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any sources about GuideML that would establish its notability. The repo itself hasn't been updated in years, and I can't find any evidence that it's being heavily used. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article also fails to meet Wikipedia criteria for both WP:SIGCOV and WP:NSOFT. The three sources provided in the article are solely from the official website of the software. I was unable to locate credible sources that provide comprehensive and in-depth coverage of the topic, which are necessary for a standalone article. Barseghian Lilia (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any sources that would establish notablity. I'm not sure about the notability of Sleepycat Software, which is the company that created the license, but I've found very little about the license itself, and notability isn't inherited from the company that created it. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP: N. The Quigley source in the existing article isn't reliable, nor are any other sources I could find online. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-09
Nulloy (Open source audio player with seekbar as waveform)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (I can't find any coverage from a reliable source about this software, so I think it fails WP: N. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NOPAGE in my view, and should be redirected to the entry at List of Generation Z slang. Seemingly all reliable sources documenting this word do so in the context of providing brief explanations of what the word is (presumably for an audience of confused parents of Gen Alpha children), and lack substantial cultural or etymological analysis, making expansion prospects for the article dim. Mach61 04:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Propel (PHP) (free object–relational mapping toolkit written in PHP)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article was PRODed four years ago because it didn't meet notability standards. A user (who is now indefinitely banned) reversed the PROD. The edit history nor the talk page actually gives a reason for the PROD. I still don't think this article meets notability guidelines, and I can't find any sources that would make it meet these guidelines. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (While there are some references, they are pretty poor - manuals and passing mentions, and the article's style is not very encyclopedic - this reads more like a how-to guide (obsolete at that). This topic has a very dubious notability. Perhaps some redirect/merger with Booting process of Windows NT might help both but... the connection here is not clear (redirect?). PS. Last year there was an AfD for this where there were promises of improvement and that WP:THEREMAYBESOURCES. Nothing has improved since, and the cited sources are how-to manuals - those are very poor indicators of notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (A PROD on this article was removed because "Swaret was used" at some point in the past. The justification, based on the edit history, is that a singular user on a public forum said that they used the package some unknown amount of time ago. I'm sending this to AfD because this added source does not establish notability. It's not reliable, does not provide extensive coverage, and it isn't clear whether the source is necessarily secondary. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP: N. I can't find any additional sources that would establish notability. Of the four sources on the page, two don't mention the library by name, and the other two are from Microsoft. This apparently had a PROD within an hour of the article's creation in 2013 which is kind of silly, but I'm sending this to AfD just to be safe. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Sourcing currently in the article is one forum (MSE) thread, two blog-posts, one youtube video from a math popularizer, and one page that is hosted on a university website but is of unclear authorship, which describes this notation as "so young that one could conceive of it as still gestating in the womb and "new and as-yet-unaccepted by the general mathematics community". Google Scholar finds no hits for the topic (searching for both the title of the article and "'triangle notation' logarithm"). The PROD rationale "Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage found." certainly describes this sourcing; it was reverted by Kvng, while adding one of the two blog posts, which doesn't suggest the presence of sources of appropriate quality. Maybe some day someone will write some RS about this subject. JBL (talk) 21:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 3 d) (Non-notable (fails WP:GNG) and promotional. There are sources, but they are not reliable. Moreover, stricter scrutininy should be given to them per WP:NCORP and WP:ORGIND. Local Variable (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Contested PROD, appears to fail WP:NCORP. IgelRM (talk) 10:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
GNOME Panel (Taskbar implementation for the GNOME desktop environment)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (GNOME Panel lacks independent, verifiable sources establishing its notability. As such, it may be appropriate to consider merging the information into the GNOME or deletion. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 17:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Just because it's a wiki project doesn't mean it's notable. All the sources that I reviewed are primary sources, data table of activity, passing mentions. The only article that seems to talk in any material way about wikibooks does so from a Wikipedia centric view and how it's complementary [12] I don't feel like this article will survive a 3 reliable reference rule audit. Greatder (talk) 01:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This "social enterprise" does not seem to have enough significant coverage or reliable sources to meet WP:NORG. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Coverage is routine and lacking significant independent reporting (mostly interviews). It does not meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 22:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This doesn’t meet WP: N. I can’t find any reliable secondary sources that actually compare different IDEs for programming in Haxe. HyperAccelerated (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Nominating on behalf of 86.23.109.101 (talk). Their rationale is as follows:
There doesn't seem to be a single source in the article that demonstrates third party coverage of this software. Citations 1, 2 and 3 are links to the software's own website. Citation 4 is an announcement that the authors of the software will be presenting it at a conference. Citations 5, 7, 10 and 11 are papers written by the authors of Sweble. Citation 6 is a dead link to what seems to have been an open source community page? Citations 8 and 9 are pages on the mediawiki wiki, unusable as sources.
A few google searches failed to turn up anything usable, mostly software repositories and the papers written by the software's authors. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))) Liu1126 (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Doesn't meet WP:CORP, though it's WP:LISTED. A WP:BEFORE search turned up only press releases, obvious sponsored content like this in WP:NEWSORGINDIA and on computing news websites, and passing mentions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:N. None of the sources in the article establish notability, and I couldn’t find any sources that would establish notability. This had a failed PROD in 2009 because two sources were added at that time. However, those sources are either primary or don’t cover the subject in depth. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:TOOSOON for an unpublished, previewed-but-not-otherwise-announced, video game. Two of the four sources are the same author, and the other two are heavily interview quotes.
My preferred result here is draftify, which I'd do unilaterally except that the article is older than 90d per WP:DRAFTIFY. ~ A412talk! 05:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Wikipedia isn't a TV guide, and this list lacks any sourcing from non-primary sources as a grouping. Let'srun (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022. Other language articles do not have sufficient citations to support notability. DonaldD23talk to me 12:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG. All citations mention the show in passing, no indepth coverage. Could find nothing better in a search. DonaldD23talk to me 21:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
ShakesQueer (3rd episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-08
WCQT-LD (Television station in Alabama, United States)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. PROD was declined with the suggestion that this page be redirected or merged to a page that does not currently exist now (although it did at the time), and I don't see any other possible targets now. Let'srun (talk) 01:08, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-09
K33DB-D (Television station in Minnesota, United States)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Subject does not meet the GNG. Merge with KMSP-TV. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 07:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Lots and lots of routine match reports and episode summaries, but where are the significant, non-database sources about Michael Dante? Fram (talk) 09:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Only an IMDb link on the page, de.wiki doesn't appear to offer RS which would meet the notability standards here. I don't speak German but I'm not seeing much which could be considered JMWt (talk) 10:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Starting a formal AfD as an editor objects to this article being a redirect. This group's claim to fame is their Eurovision Song Contest 2016 appearance, and all references included in the article and through an internet search appear to pertain to that appearance. Per WP:ONEEVENT, I propose a redirect to Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2016, which is a good article and includes all notable endeavors by this group in greater detail and with additional context. Grk1011 (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2012.
I looked at the 7 other languages pages, and they either had no citations or the citations were not usable toward notability requirements (primary/database/etc). DonaldD23talk to me 13:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2015.
PROD removed because one of the other languages has citations, but looking at them they are either primary or mention the show in passing. DonaldD23talk to me 13:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (A minor spin off not nearly notable enough for its own article, page has zero citations and the contents of the article is just a short 3 sentence lead (one of which is entirely related to the other two spin-offs) and a redundant episodes list.
I am also nominating the previous spin-off, Mister Maker Comes to Town. The article has much more content, and 2 citations. The first citation is just an official Mister Maker flash game irrelevant to the lead where it is cited (and doesnt seem to be about this specific spin-off at all), and the other citation is likely much more relevant but hidden behind a paywall.
There doesn't seem to be any good sources for either article, I don't beleive either article is notable.
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (A minor spin off not nearly notable enough for its own article, page has zero citations and the contents of the article is just a short 3 sentence lead (one of which is entirely related to the other two spin-offs) and a redundant episodes list.
I am also nominating the previous spin-off, Mister Maker Comes to Town. The article has much more content, and 2 citations. The first citation is just an official Mister Maker flash game irrelevant to the lead where it is cited (and doesnt seem to be about this specific spin-off at all), and the other citation is likely much more relevant but hidden behind a paywall.
There doesn't seem to be any good sources for either article, I don't beleive either article is notable.
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Insufficient notability, perhaps merge into a Truck Simulator community section? Apart from unreliable Metro, sources appear to be about a community around the game as a whole. IgelRM (talk) 12:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (I couldn't find any significant English sources, and the Chinese sources that I found seemed to be the company's financial reports. QuietCicadachirp 17:09, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Similar to what has occurred with The Sims 2, I have created independent pages for each expansion pack, which strike me as independently notable and therefore appropriately demerged once the proper review sources were found and drafted on each page. This article now has no purpose other than as a list that would hypothetically be better assimilated as a WP:MERGE with the primary page The Sims. This change has been signalled on the talk page for a while without objection. The article now offers little information on its own that couldn't be found on a page for the game or the individual expansions, and is therefore appropriate for deletion. Nonetheless putting this page to an AfD for visibility and proper discussion given that it is a major article change. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-16
Heather Mason (Fictional character in Silent Hill 3)
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Having a hard time to find any SIGCOV about Heather per WP:BEFORE, either at google scholar (I might be wrong). Ref 26 and 27 might be helpful, but isn't enough to pull WP:GNG around somehow. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 11:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Red Bull making a venture into esports is notable; this is attested to by the reliable sources given. The organization itself was never notable during its history as it never made it to a top-tier league, nor did it ever sign notable players. The sources given may justify a few sentences talking about this failed venture at the Red Bull article, but it does not justify this former esports organization having its own article. Yue🌙 19:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:TOOSOON for an unpublished, previewed-but-not-otherwise-announced, video game. Two of the four sources are the same author, and the other two are heavily interview quotes.
My preferred result here is draftify, which I'd do unilaterally except that the article is older than 90d per WP:DRAFTIFY. ~ A412talk! 05:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Nominating on behalf of an IP who made a request at WT:AFD which says: This article needs to be nominated for deletion. It cites no sources (despite being tagged for a decade now), and the subject doesn't meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Shock were a short-lived British dance troupe from the early 80s, but were never famous in their own right. They were known only by association. They released two singles, neither of which charted. Their former members are not prominent or widely known beyond this troupe. CycloneYoristalk! 08:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Flaccus, the slave of someone named Claudius, provided musical accompaniment on the tibia to each of the plays of Terence when they were originally produced, and nothing else will ever be known about him. He has no notability independent of Terence, and does not merit an entry of his own in either the Oxford Classical Dictionary or Grove Music Online. Anything that can be written about him belongs at Terence or the articles on each of his six plays. Cal Engime (talk) 18:39, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Does not appear to pass WP:GNG based on sources in article and search of Newspapers.com. Most of the sources in the article are passing mentions and the only significant coverage is from questionable sources. Additionally, the only significant contributors to the page ([13]) appear to be users with conflicts of interest. Eagles24/7(C) 23:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Not notable per WP:NSCHOOL, that is, per WP:ORG or WP:GNG. All I can find about it online is similar to what's here: passing mentions in articles about other things, and routine school listings. Proposed deletion last week was contested without comment by the article creator. Wikishovel (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This person does not have many citations and is only known for allegations of sexual misconduct. Yolandagonzales (talk) 08:10, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:NBUILDING. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable article. Attempted to PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock/blocked editor). Ckfasdf (talk) 06:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:NONPROFIT guidelines state that organizations, including schools, must meet specific criteria. Firstly, their activities should have a national or international scope. Secondly, the organization must have received substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization. However, in the case of this school, there are only two references available, and they do not directly pertain to the school. Moreover, there is no evidence indicating that the school is known nationally. Ckfasdf (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Poor sourcing on the page, little else found which counts towards the inclusion criteria on en.wiki
A redirect seems unhelpful given there are other communities with similar/identical names so it would require a move first. Nothing much to merge to Anglican Church in JapanJMWt (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Little on the page to suggest this cleric meets the inclusion standards. Middle ranking Anglican clerics do not have assumed notability JMWt (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (As far as I can tell, this is just some guy that somebody knew in their community. Absolutely does not pass WP:CREATIVE. A lot of the language is biased and speaks on a personal level about Shainblum rather than an overview of any specific accomplishments. A lot of this article talks about art, and yet he's never sold a painting, been in a gallery, nothing. The teaching piece isn't notable either.OsmiumGuard (talk) 15:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Possibly fails WP:SIGCOV. Based on the conversation at Talk:Losing Our Sons#Notable?, I am bringing this here. Perhaps others will have better luck finding more references. Either way this has been tagged for notability since 2013 and its time to make a decision one way or the other as a community. 4meter4 (talk) 15:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Unfortunately seems to be a non-notable event backed up by just a single secondary source from Slate -- no independent third-party coverage apart from that (I was unable to find anything meaningful myself). The rest of the article is just spun off from primary sources. KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬 21:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. A Google search only shows passing mentions in articles, no significant coverage. He was mostly a minor league referee that officiated in a small handful of NHL games. Not notable enough for an article. My Pants Metal (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (So I am not really familiar with football topics in Wikipedia. But something tells me the football team of a village populated by 2,085 people is not notable. This article has two sources one of which is a general Hungarian football directory and the other is the team's official website. I don't think this football team is notable. SuperΨDro 00:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN as this is not a grouping discussed in secondary sources. I found some lists of the quarterbacks in the league, but not specifically for starting quarterbacks. Let'srun (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Footballer who has played on the Finnish third tier. This not being professional by any means, the BLP needs strong sources to support the counter-intuitive claim that the player has significant coverage (as opposed to WP:ROUTINE/WP:MILL/local news). The two sources from Keski-Uusimaa.fi are paywalled, but look like a match report and a pre-match report respectively. Geschichte (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Wikipedia is not a statistics database. It seems entirely random to list the top 50 in a given event, with an international final only consisting of 8 or 9 competitors, whereas the wider field reaching as far down as top 50 are never talked about as an interconnected group. Why not top 25? Or top 100? Category:Year rankings in athletics is still a fledgling project, so it's time to nip it in the bud. Geschichte (talk) 21:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Despite having achieved two medals, I couldn't find enough significant coverage of this bobsleigh athlete that would meet WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Everything that came up in my searches are brief mentions (TVP Sport and Wrocław Naszemiasto), as well as silly, random namesakes. Corresponding article on Polish Wikipedia article has been tagged for not having sources except external links for 14 years; no major edits since 2022. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
Indiawin Sports (Indian sports team owner, subsidiary of Reliance Industries)
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (WP:NOTINHERITED. Just because they own a bunch of cricket teams, that doesn't mean that the company itself is notable enough. I don't see enough independent coverage of them (i.e. other than just saying they own these teams) to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (I believe the subject fails to meet GNG. This footballer played some international games but I cannot find any significant coverage of his life or career. MarchOfTheGreyhounds 19:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Playing football for a national team doesn't give automatic notability, so neither does coaching. This manager is covered in passing mentions only, failing the WP:SIGCOV guideline. No lasting impact on Bhutan whatsoever, so fails WP:SUSTAINED (as well as informal essays such as WP:IMPACT/WP:10YT). I can't find anything else about him; not his age, where he is from, if he was a player himself, other managerial jobs etc. Simply put, Henk Walk is not biography material and being a name in a list at Bhutan national football team#Coaching history should suffice. Geschichte (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NOLY or any other pertinent category, came 9th in only race participated in. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Subject fails WP:GNG, WP:NMMA and WP:NBOX. Not having WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS, WP:RS where by the subject is talk about i length and in dept and not passing mentioned for WP:V. Sources talking about announcements and results of fights are considered routing report and can not be contribute to the subject notability. Cassiopeiatalk 23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (Soccerway stub on a footballer that played two matches before disappearing. My own searches yielded nothing better than Telegraph India, which mentions him in the title and an image caption but only once in the main article prose (so it's not WP:SIGCOV), and TOI, another match report that mentions him, this time his performance wasn't so good and the article mentions some mistakes he made but doesn't go into any depth about him as an individual. From the second article, we can perhaps make a presumption as to why his career was so short (although this would be WP:OR) but having a bad game, on its own, is not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG and I don't see any actual direct significant coverage of Khara. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Badly sourced BLP. My own searches yielded a passing mention in Noroeste and the usual database sources like BeSoccer and Soccerway. He has an extremely common name so there might be WP:SIGCOV out there somewhere but I'm really struggling and this article has been in a dreadful state since 2016 so an AfD is overdue. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (I don't see how this article doesn't violate WP:SYNTHESIS. Ignoring the blatant MOS:ACCESS issues with the tables (which I could address), these tables constitute original research and an assemblage of indiscriminate statistics. The very first table, for example, simply shows that Russia has won a gold medal in each of the listed events, but not how many, and then an unsourced total on the right column. Additionally, synchronized skating is (unfortunately) a separate entity from other figure skating disciplines. This is another example of someone treating Wikipedia like a figure skating fan wiki. Bgsu98(Talk) 00:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Played in just one professional game before disappearing. Searching in Korean and Japanese, I was only able to find FC Gifu, which is not an independent source, and a bunch of database sources. I can't find anything that would meet WP:SPORTBASIC #5. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 00:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This was a plan that never actually happened. The plan had some coverage, but not enough, and I am not sure how ambiguous a name like this is for a tall building. Boleyn (talk) 16:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (This building in Argentina article has zero references to establish notability. While it contains interesting details, the tone is generally promotional. After searching, found a few social media, and mentions with similar names in other countries, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of this specific building. Article was created by a new user on 4 November 2009 (their only contribution to Wikipedia). Article was PROD on February 6, 2020, then De-prod on February 9. JoeNMLC (talk) 07:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 3 d) (This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. WP:BEFORE does not call up any RS for this artist. I am not finding any sources for claims of being in collections. The article, as currently written, has 4 dead links. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:EVENT/WP:GNG concerns: fairly run-of-the-mill type of temporary travelling museum exhibition. Most relevant online sources I've found are primary sources (museums/exhibition organiser) or opinion pieces largely from Nine Entertainment (WP:RSEDITORIAL, WP:BOMBARDMENT). Fork99 (talk) 08:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (WP:BLP of an artist, not properly referenced as passing WP:NARTIST. The main notability claim here is that she and her work exist, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient third-party coverage about her and her work to clear WP:GNG -- but three of the four footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the fourth is a single deadlinked newspaper article of purely local interest in the local newspaper of the city where she was living at the time, which is not enough to get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only reliable source in the mix. Additionally, this has recently undergone several days of vandalism by an anonymous IP who persistently blanked large portions of it, generally with claims that the stuff they were removing was "incorrect", but the quality of the referencing is so poor that I can't even sort out what's correct or not in the first place — none of the sourcing confirms any of the disputed facts, but none of it contradicts them either — and the IP may possibly have a conflict of interest to boot. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on her sourceability. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Cannot identify any sources on Google Scholar, Google News, and Google Books. General search also brings up nothing that can establish notability. There may be information that can establish notability in Korean. If notability can't be established then content could be merged with Byeon Sang-byeokTraumnovelle (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
The Circle Club (Private members' club in central Manchester, England)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable nightclub. Article has been an orphan since creation in 2007 and its references are thin. WP:BEFORE reveals only basic local press coverage of this venue, mostly related to its closure. Flip Format (talk) 14:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Seems to fail WP:GNG, there are some announcements kind of sources, routine coverage and non-independent interview, but I fail to see any real independent SIGCOV about the person. Tehonk (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:SIGCOV. Only sources in the entire article are awards he has received for his projects, and none of the info in the lead is verified in the body (if there even is a body). 🔥Jalapeño🔥Stupid stuff I did 12:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I am proposing this article for deletion. This mall/development was never built and w and apparently the developer cancelled it. I don't think this would warrant inclusion in Wikipedia if it was never built in the first place. If you visit the proposed site around Steeles and Kennedy in Markham today, all you'll find is an empty patch of land. It is next to Pacific Mall.
You may want to search on Google- there are complaints about people who bought condos as part of this development that was never built.
Wikipedia should not host articles about proposed developments that didn't get off the ground.
WizardGamer775 (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 4 d) (Relatively new journal, not indexed in any selective database, does not meet WP:NJournals. The current version of the article has 11 references. However, almost all are not independent, but either published by the journal itself or its publisher. One independent source is an article in The Washington Post, which is stated to have used the journal to "source" an article. This is somewhat of an exaggeration: the TWP article cites Billy Tringali, mentioning that he's the editor of the Journal of Anime and Manga Studies, so in fact this is just an in passing mention. Taken together, this article also misses WP:GNG, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022. Other language articles do not have sufficient citations to support notability. DonaldD23talk to me 12:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Comic world arc/plot summary and nothing but (no references, either, one broken EL). No reception, or analysis, my BEFORE failed to find anything substantial. Fails WP:GNG. Suggest redirecting to List of New X-Men story arcs per WP:ATD-R. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Comic series, short-lived (4-years), unreferenced since 2007, my BEFORE failed to find anything useful. Fails WP:GNG, WP:V. If nobody can rescue this, potential redirects targets per WP:ATD-R: [[ Mark Alessi]] (co-creator), CrossGen (publisher). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:47, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2012.
I looked at the 7 other languages pages, and they either had no citations or the citations were not usable toward notability requirements (primary/database/etc). DonaldD23talk to me 13:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Normally I would redirect this article to List of Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies characters, but I do not think that would be appropriate because not only does the single source only mention this character in passing, but the article itself mentions more than one possible name for the character. Erpertblah, blah, blah... 12:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Doesn't satisfy even WP:ANYBIO, citations only talk about the fashion week and lack of full coverage for the subject. Htanaungg (talk) 03:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Just a suburban development built around 1960. Searching is pretty hopeless given commonality of the name. Mangoe (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Folks, please read the sources carefully and look at the maps. This Lowell obviously wasn't laid out in 1853, as it consists entirely of tract homes. It also rather abruptly appears on the topos. And this is no surprise, because Baker's passage refers to the town in Lake County, not this place. This is yet another subdivision around Columbus, and lacks any notability. Mangoe (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Yet another NN subdivision around Columbus that in this case sprung up around 1960. Searching was inhibited by a neighborhood in Bloomington and by Google's Artificially Unintelligent decision to treat "north" as a synonym of "Northcliff", but even so I found nothing. Mangoe (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The name pretty much tells all: this is yet another 1960-era subdivision, this time on the outskirts of Edinburgh instead of Columbus, but otherwise of a sameness with its other NN counterparts further south in the county. Mangoe (talk) 02:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (So far, unincorporated towns in eastern Indiana have tended to have obvious existence on the maps and aerials. This is an exception, being as far back as I can go an intersection with a couple of random buildings (and on GMaps, a cell tower). Searching was difficult due to a civil war battle in Kentucky and other false hits, so it pretty much comes down to Baker's place names book, which we've had enough issues with that I'm not willing to take as a sole authority. Mangoe (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 2 d) (Fails WP: GNG and WP: SIGCOV. There were questionable sources cited and they neither say why the article is notable. Otuọcha (talk) 09:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (The subject lacks substantial coverage in reputable third-party sources and fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:MUSICBIO. The existing sources do not establish notability effectively. Additionally, the source from middleeasteye.net is an interview, and its reliability is questionable, infomigrants.net is not reliable, and the article from The Guardian seems to rely heavily on hearsay. A WP:BEFORE search yielded no additional reliable sources beyond those currently cited. GSS💬 14:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Unrepresented minor party which received less than 1% of the vote in elections. Clearly fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." AusLondonder (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Northern Press (News publisher based in Northern Uganda)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:ORGCRIT, non-notable periodical published by non-notable journalist who fails GNG. Official website looks like a free web host. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable, closed distillery with no WP:RS on page, none that I could find, and none are likely to exist. Cabrils (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 0 d) (Unrepresented minor political party lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" required by WP:ORGCRIT. Has has no secondary sources since creation nearly two decades ago. AusLondonder (talk) 10:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Starting a formal AfD as an editor objects to this article being a redirect. This group's claim to fame is their Eurovision Song Contest 2016 appearance, and all references included in the article and through an internet search appear to pertain to that appearance. Per WP:ONEEVENT, I propose a redirect to Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2016, which is a good article and includes all notable endeavors by this group in greater detail and with additional context. Grk1011 (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (9 k, 3 d) (Reviewed during NPP. No evidence of notability under GNG or SNG. A defunct local football club. North8000 (talk) 14:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 5 d) (WP:NOTNEWS, fails WP:GNG , WP:LASTING and while an essay, does fail WP:AIRCRASH. The only articles talking about the incident are aviation websites with basically no mainstream news sites talking about the incident. I seriously have doubts whether this incident will result in any changes as it happened over Somaliland. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (9 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Yes there are a couple of obituaries here but it appears that only one of her books was notable and appears in any libraries. They may be notable one day but right now it's WP:TOOSOON𝔓420°𝔓Holla 11:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
Codest Boi (Nigerian musician and songwriter (born 1995))
AfD (2 k, 5 d) (Fails WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO, sources are mostly music releases, the PM News Nigeria is mediocre. As such, non-notable. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:ORGCRIT, current sources are either WP:PRIMARY or do not provide WP:SIGCOV. A BEFORE also doesn't help but turn out profiles, etc. NAN and Guardian Nigeria pieces are obviously press releases. Also, generally fails WP:GNG. Thus, non-notable entity. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I could not find much sources during a BEFORE check other than celebrations and activities by organizations. Suggesting incorporating such content in the nonexistent Safer Internet Day as it got media interest beyond Nigeria only. Toadette(Let's discuss together!) 20:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 7 d) (Just as non-notable per WP:BIO as he was two weeks ago, but as an obvious sock/meatpuppet has removed the db-repost speedy tag, here it is again at AFD. Article creator never responded to questions about use of multiple accounts at their user talk page. Perhaps this AFD will end quickly with a db-repost, once the two accounts have been blocked for sockpuppetry. In the meantime, a WP:BEFORE search turns up only the same gushing paid puff pieces, primary sources (such as interviews), and passing mentions. Wikishovel (talk) 14:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (Fails WP:GNG or WP:NPOL. Current sources do not count towards GNG and a BEFORE makes no difference. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, or a vehicle for advertising and showcasing. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:00, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG. Sources are bunches of unreliable, paid puffery, interviews, passing mentions, which can not align with WP:BLP. Non-notable entity. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG. Sources are either passing mentions, dependent, or primary. BEFORE makes no difference. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (WP:BLP of a politician, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL. The notability claims here are as a youth political organizer and as yet unelected candidate in a future election, neither of which are grounds for a Wikipedia article per se -- the notability test at NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just running for one -- but the referencing is almost entirely to primary sources and glancing namechecks of his existence in coverage about other things, which are not support for notability, and the one hit of media coverage about him winning a primary to contest the future election is not by itself enough to make him more special than all the other unelected candidates in the country who aren't getting articles on that basis. Obviously no prejudice against recreation in the fall if he wins the seat, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to already get him an article now. Bearcat (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:GNG or WP:NJOURNALIST. Article has many issues with sourcing, very dependent. He works for MFWA, The Fourth Estate, and pieces from thefourthgate are used 10 times in this article. Other pieces are mostly passing mentions, some awards by the organisation he works for, others, non-notable. ModernGhana and newsghana.com.gh are unreliable publications. Thus, non-notable investigative journalist. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG, current sources do not help towards WP:BLP and a BEFORE also suggests they're non-notable. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:49, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (Party contested one election and received 40 (!) votes, or 0.03%. Needless to say, it does not meet WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Sourcing consists of name drops and Who's Who regarded as unacceptable. Fails WP:BASIC as lacking "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject". AusLondonder (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (No refs on the page for many years. Seems unlikely that a stadium for a lower league team is notable but would be interested if anyone else can find sources that meet the GNG standard JMWt (talk) 09:45, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Not notable per WP:NSCHOOL, that is, per WP:ORG or WP:GNG. All I can find about it online is similar to what's here: passing mentions in articles about other things, and routine school listings. Proposed deletion last week was contested without comment by the article creator. Wikishovel (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-02-28
Fidel Vargas (American politician in California (born 1968))
AfD (2 k, 3 d) (Previously nominated in a 48-article bundle which was closed as a procedural keep due to the bundle's size. This person has received some coverage in the LA Times, among other sources, but most of it is WP:ROTM election coverage. The only good thing I could find was this from the LA Times, this from Al Día News and maybe this from Hispanic Executive. The latter two are not major sources. The rest of the coverage that I could find is non-independent. He has held many positions within presidential administrations but none of them confer notability, and I don't think being named in a Time magazine makes you notable either. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article about a band, not properly sourced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. The principal attempt at a notability claim here is that they had "one notable radio hit", but without any attempt at sourcing that the song was ever actually a hit -- NMUSIC #2 looking for IFPI-certified national pop charts on the order of Billboard, while music publicity mavens tend to indiscriminately attach the word "hit" to any song that ever got played on any radio station at all, so a song isn't automatically a notability-clinching "hit" just because you call it one without proper sourcing for that. But there's no other strong notability claim here at all, the referencing is entirely to (deadlinked) primary sourcing and blogs that aren't support for notability without a shred of WP:GNG-building coverage about them shown, and the article has been flagged as needing better referencing since 2010 without improvement. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 14:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (WP:BLP of a political organizer, not properly sourced as having a genuinely strong claim to passing WP:NPOL. As currently written, the main notability claim here is that he exists, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of strong evidence that he would pass WP:GNG -- and while this is a pared-back version of an article that's been moderately longer in the past, I can't revert to older versions as they contained criminal allegations that can't be in the article at all without airtight sourcing for them, and might still just make him a WP:BLP1E anyway. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody wants to write a substantial article and source it properly, but the scandal can't be in the article at all without solid sourcing for it, and he just doesn't have any other meaningful notability claims if this is all that can be said about him outside of the scandal. Bearcat (talk) 06:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article is mainly promotional in nature, cites the subject's press release as a source, and arguably violates TOU per maintenance tag. Any truly notable material can easily be merged into similar articles. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-03
Henrybuilt (American design and manufacturing company)
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Realtively small company making kitchens and furniture with no particularly notable features. No obvious ways of linking to other Wikipedia pages Newhaven lad (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Preparatory school lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" required per WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 18:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This is a resume, not an article with reliable sources and significant coverage to demonstrate notability. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 3 d) (Hyper-local niche family owned grocery store with mere three stores in the Portland, Oregon metro area. Fails WP:NCORP Coverages are all routine and hyper-local. Graywalls (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines. A Google search only shows passing mentions in articles, no significant coverage. He was mostly a minor league referee that officiated in a small handful of NHL games. Not notable enough for an article. My Pants Metal (talk) 14:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (There is no purpose in having a page dedicated to two states with separate pages, nor is there a reason to have a page dedicated to the relationship of two states. NotAMoleMan (talk) 02:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Here we get a peek into the GNIS process, which actually appears to go back over a century. The post office, everyone seems to agree, was named "Amzi", but GNIS cites a Board of Geog. Names decision which is dated Jan. 12, 1897 in preferring Treadwell. Nonetheless, the name didn't appear on the topos until it was back-added from GNIS, and the latter claims that the source of all its info on the spot comes from ADC maps. I have a lot of experience with the latter (everyone around here used them for street maps before Garmin) and I wouldn't take them as terribly authoritative on this sort of place name— but also, if the name didn't get entered until 1993, what's with the 1897 decision? And where did ADC get the name from?
This leaves us with the 1900-era cyclopedia, which has come up before. It mentions Amzi, but I can't tell whether it also mentions Treadwell, because apparently only the fist volume (A-E) is available online. Again, we have the population figure which doesn't appear to come from the census. Amzi is called a "post-village", which could mean a place that's just a post office. And the authors seem unaware of the BoGN decision. My reading is that this is an area served by a post office, but without evidence that it is a distinct settlement. Mangoe (talk) 03:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:SIGCOV. Only sources in the entire article are awards he has received for his projects, and none of the info in the lead is verified in the body (if there even is a body). 🔥Jalapeño🔥Stupid stuff I did 12:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 3 d) (This artist does not meet WP:NARTIST. She has not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, or won significant critical attention, or been represented within the permanent collections of any notable galleries or museums. WP:BEFORE does not call up any RS for this artist. I am not finding any sources for claims of being in collections. The article, as currently written, has 4 dead links. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Like his father, Alfred Cowles Jr., good sourcing is lacking. Reads like a genealogical entry. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (I have conducted WP:BEFORE search and I am not finding independent coverage beyond La Crosse Tribune local paper, and repeated mentions of "La Crosse Technology's Atomic Digital Alarm Clock with a retail value of $29.95!" in Popular Science magazine. Graywalls (talk) 08:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (I've done some research into Druxy's and it doesn't seem to be notable at all. If you search in Google News, they only mention a few things such as an acquisition and a listeria incident. Indeed, I would even say that this coverage is merely trivial.
Also, Williams Fresh Cafe doesn't even have its own article on Wikipedia.
If there's any new info about its notability feel free to share it otherwise, this article should be deleted. Thank you. WizardGamer775 (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I am proposing this article for deletion. This mall/development was never built and w and apparently the developer cancelled it. I don't think this would warrant inclusion in Wikipedia if it was never built in the first place. If you visit the proposed site around Steeles and Kennedy in Markham today, all you'll find is an empty patch of land. It is next to Pacific Mall.
You may want to search on Google- there are complaints about people who bought condos as part of this development that was never built.
Wikipedia should not host articles about proposed developments that didn't get off the ground.
WizardGamer775 (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (There is a Turkish company called Atlas Energy (Atlas Enerji in Turkish) but this one does not seem to have enough sources to be notable Chidgk1 (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (WP:BLP of an artist, not properly referenced as passing WP:NARTIST. The main notability claim here is that she and her work exist, which isn't automatically enough in the absence of sufficient third-party coverage about her and her work to clear WP:GNG -- but three of the four footnotes here are primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and the fourth is a single deadlinked newspaper article of purely local interest in the local newspaper of the city where she was living at the time, which is not enough to get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only reliable source in the mix. Additionally, this has recently undergone several days of vandalism by an anonymous IP who persistently blanked large portions of it, generally with claims that the stuff they were removing was "incorrect", but the quality of the referencing is so poor that I can't even sort out what's correct or not in the first place — none of the sourcing confirms any of the disputed facts, but none of it contradicts them either — and the IP may possibly have a conflict of interest to boot. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG on her sourceability. Bearcat (talk) 14:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (Subject does not meet the WP:LISTN as this is not a grouping discussed in secondary sources. I found some lists of the quarterbacks in the league, but not specifically for starting quarterbacks. Let'srun (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Founder of a non-notable company. Article has been tagged for improvements since 2019 and is largely unsourced. Subject has appeared on Forbes' "30 under 30" list, but I'm not sure if this is enough for establishing notability. CycloneYoristalk! 04:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (A short-serving mayor of a fairly small city. Fails WP:NPOL as not being a "major local political figure who has received significant press coverage". Coverage almost exclusively related to two incidents, one in which she accused another politician of swearing at her, another in which her husband was arrested in a domestic incident. AusLondonder (talk) 06:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (The previous AfD was closed without consensus, and without any improvements since then, still fails notability guidelines, especially NCORP. BEFORE search turned no reliable search at least. Toadette(Let's discuss together!) 08:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 3 d) (Article about a political figure, not properly sourced as passing WP:NPOL. The main notability claim here is that he served on the municipal council of a mid-sized suburban city, which is not "inherently" notable -- at the local level of office, the notability test is not passed just by verifying that the person exists, but by writing and sourcing substantial content about his political impact. But while this is at least trying to head in that direction with some statements about specific projects he's been involved in as a councillor, it's completely failing to source them properly: the only two footnotes here are the city's self-published list of its council members on its own website and a book he wrote himself circularly cited as verification of its own existence, neither of which are support for notability. We need to see third-party coverage about his work in sources independent of himself, not stuff he had personal editorial control over. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to be referenced much, much better than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (Article about a mayor who served for a relatively short term, containing no secondary sources at all. Completely fails WP:BASIC. AusLondonder (talk) 11:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (WP:BLP of a politician, not properly referenced as passing WP:NPOL. As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to have significant reliable source coverage enabling us to write substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. As written, however, this is strictly on the level of "Ken Popove is a mayor who exists, the end", and features absolutely none of the type of content that an article about a mayor needs to show -- and for sourcing, it's citing purely run of the mill verification of his election victories, with absolutely none of the ongoing "in office" coverage that's required. Chilliwack is a large enough city that its mayors would be eligible to keep substantively written and well-sourced articles that met WP:NPOL #2, but it is in no sense large or significant enough that he would get an automatic notability freebie on an article that's this inadequate. Bearcat (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (WP:BLP of a politician, not properly referenced as passing WP:NPOL. As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to be shown to have significant reliable source coverage enabling us to write substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, specific effects their leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. As written, however, this is mainly just background biographical trivia that has nothing to do with establishing notability, and features absolutely none of the type of content that an article about a mayor actually needs to show -- and for sourcing, it's citing a mix of run of the mill verification of his election victories and primary sourcing that isn't support for notability at all, with absolutely none of the ongoing "in office" coverage that's required. Chilliwack is a large enough city that its mayors would be eligible to keep substantively written and well-sourced articles that met WP:NPOL #2, but it is in no sense large or significant enough that he would get an automatic notability freebie on an article that's this inadequate. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Poorly-sourced article about a mayor. As always, mayors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just by virtue of existing -- the notability of a mayor hinges on writing and sourcing substantive content about his political impact: specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth. But this is strictly on the level of "Dan Rogers is a mayor who existed, the end", and is "referenced" solely to his "meet your mayor" profile on the self-published website of the city government, which is a primary source that does not support notability at all. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to hand him an automatic inclusion freebie without WP:GNG-worthy coverage. Bearcat (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Article about a mayor, not properly demonstrated as passing WP:NPOL #2. As always, mayors are not "inherently" notable just for existing, and have to show significant reliable source coverage supporting substantive content about their political impact: specific things they did, specific projects they spearheaded, significant effects their leadership had on the development of the community, and on and so forth. But the bulk of the content here is background biographical trivia that isn't evidence of notability, while his mayoralty is summarily dispatched as "election result, the end" -- and for sourcing, there's one hit of verification of the election results, three primary sources that aren't support for notability, and one book that doesn't cover the subject at all, but is here to tangentially "verify" background information about his ancestors, and fails to even really do that because it contains the surname Ruttan but was published in 1869, and thus obviously fails to name John Ruttan at all for the purposes of properly verifying that he's actually a descendant of any of the Ruttans covered in that book. And even if that were somehow more verifiable than it is, that still wouldn't help to support John Ruttan's notability anyway, since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much more sourcing and substance than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 3 d) (Mayor of a small city, does not meet the criteria at WP:NPOL. Sourcing is purely routine local media coverage. AusLondonder (talk) 17:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 5 d) (Appears to be a non-notable band that doesn't pass WP:NBAND. Lot of non-neutral puffery and a before search didn't turn up enough to convince me that they're notable. Article was also created by Michaelxcrusty, who appears to be a member of the band based on the members listed. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Contested PROD. Subject is a local elementary school with no apparent notability beyond being named for a Starbucks executive, which is a good chunk of the article and its sources. The sources that do focus on the school are from a local newspaper, the school district, or state databases, thus not meeting WP:GNG. SounderBruce 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 7 d) (WP:BLP of a politician, not properly referenced as passing WP:NPOL. The attempted notability claim here is that she serves as chair of a British Columbia regional district, which is essentially that province's equivalent to a county council -- but politicians at the local level of office are not automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to show a significant depth and range of media coverage about their work to demonstrate that they should be seen as special cases of significantly greater notability than the norm for that level of prominence. But this is written more like a résumé than a neutral encyclopedia article, and is "referenced" entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability, with not even one hit of WP:GNG-building third party media coverage shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 20:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NLIST, almost exclusively unsourced list of non-notable mayors of fairly small city. AusLondonder (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Just a suburban development built around 1960. Searching is pretty hopeless given commonality of the name. Mangoe (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Ping, Washington (Unincorporated community in Washington, United States)
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Contested PROD. No information at all found about this place; satellite view of coordinates shows a rural intersection with a couple of scattered farms in the area. GNIS is insufficient for notability, as is the onetime existence of a post office. The place-names guide (reference 4) does call it a "town" but I have strong doubts about its reliability; it uses the word "town" to describe countless other places that were nothing more than railroad sidings or individual farms. Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
This article is a paid work by an editor who is being compensated by the subject. A draft has been created, Draft:Paloma Aguirre, which was declined twice, once for sourcing issues, once for tone issues. The author then created this article, which is the same as the draft, in article space. This bypassed AFC review, and bypassing AFC review is permitted except for paid editors. Review of the sources shows that this article does not establish biographical notability. Only the first reference is independent. The first reference, a newspaper account of her election, is a good source. The other four sources are associated with the subject or with organizations with which she is associated:
So this article can be deleted, at least for now, rather than being reviewed and sanitized due to the conflict of interest, and the draft can be left for improvement. This does not mean that she is not notable, or that she is notable, but that the article does not establish notability, and so the questions of tone and neutrality do not need to be addressed. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Folks, please read the sources carefully and look at the maps. This Lowell obviously wasn't laid out in 1853, as it consists entirely of tract homes. It also rather abruptly appears on the topos. And this is no surprise, because Baker's passage refers to the town in Lake County, not this place. This is yet another subdivision around Columbus, and lacks any notability. Mangoe (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Yet another NN subdivision around Columbus that in this case sprung up around 1960. Searching was inhibited by a neighborhood in Bloomington and by Google's Artificially Unintelligent decision to treat "north" as a synonym of "Northcliff", but even so I found nothing. Mangoe (talk) 19:18, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The name pretty much tells all: this is yet another 1960-era subdivision, this time on the outskirts of Edinburgh instead of Columbus, but otherwise of a sameness with its other NN counterparts further south in the county. Mangoe (talk) 02:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
WLEP-LD (Television station in Erie, Pennsylvania (2011–2019))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (So far, unincorporated towns in eastern Indiana have tended to have obvious existence on the maps and aerials. This is an exception, being as far back as I can go an intersection with a couple of random buildings (and on GMaps, a cell tower). Searching was difficult due to a civil war battle in Kentucky and other false hits, so it pretty much comes down to Baker's place names book, which we've had enough issues with that I'm not willing to take as a sole authority. Mangoe (talk) 15:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The article is titled as if it is about a topic. It's just a list of members without any real context as to why the members are notable or what the purpose of the society is. Shadow311 (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (One of many "Occupation: Relative" Wiki entries that got created back in the day—even his granddaughter Stella had a page at one point—but somehow it got overlooked when these sort of trivialities were being purged by the numbers. Subject was never covered in the mass media and had no public career to speak of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yours6700 (talk • contribs) 20:34, March 14, 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Not yet notable WP:NACTOR, with only minor roles so far. In a WP:BEFORE search, the only significant coverage I could find was the WDIV-TV source cited, from local television news. Wikishovel (talk) 17:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Does not meet WP:ORGCRIT as lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. Lacking any secondary sources at all. AusLondonder (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (One of the worst articles I've ever come across, previous AfD was a farce. Zero secondary sources. No evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources per WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 16:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No indication of notability. Article is strongly promotional, including phone and fax (!) numbers. AusLondonder (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable per WP:BIO, WP:NAUTHOR and WP:ENT. He's a lawyer who's had some notable clients, but on Wikipedia notability is not inherited. The book is self-published, and the only review of it I could find in reliable sources is the St. Joseph News-Press review cited. He has appeared on some local news broadcasts, appeared once on Court TV as a legal commentator (at 4:00 - 8:26 in the source cited), and wrote a commentary piece for the News Journal, but the sources for that are all primary. All I could find about him in a WP:BEFORE search of secondary sources was passing mentions, with no significant coverage of him, apart from him speaking publicly about cases where he was counsel. Article creator is a declared paid editor for another Las Vegas company, and both the unsourced personal details and repeated uploads of promotional photos suggests conflict of interest or undisclosed paid editing. Wikishovel (talk) 10:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Seems like a single event with limited ongoing impact so looks like it might not meet WP:LASTING. The refs appear to be WP:ROUTINE and more than 90% of the page is not sourced and therefore per WP:V could be removed. JMWt (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No indication of notability per WP:ORG, and almost entirely sourced by primary sources. No significant coverage from secondary sources found in a WP:BEFORE search, just passing mentions of someone winning a NAAAP award [14], [15]. Wikishovel (talk) 16:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 3 d) (Non-notable political candidate. Doesn't seem like he's gotten much news coverage outside of routine coverage of his Senate campaigns. I would support a redirect to 2024 United States Senate election in Ohio. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 02:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Another leftover from a failed group nom, this was synthesized from Durham and a couple of other sources, neither of which testifies to a town by this name. I was able to "verify" the post office against Jim Forte's site, which is technically self-published but which we have never run into cause for doubting; he gives its dates as 1869-1912, for what that's worth. There's no GNIS entry for it and I haven't seen any sign of it on topos, and I cannot work out where the coordinates came from. The part about the "Beckwourth Trail" refers to the valley, not a town, so it's irrelevant. Someone who has a copy of Durham may be able to shed more light on this but the most reasonable guess is that there was a post office set up at the saw mill. That's not the same as a notable settlement. Mangoe (talk) 02:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Declined PROD. This location is non-notable and I can find no evidence it was ever a "town"; the existence of a post office for three years and the appearance of a dot with the name "Drumheller" on a 1963 plat map do not establish notability. Reference 3 (Meany) does use the word "town", but other recent AfD's have shown that source played fast and loose with its research. GNIS is not notability, and a rural schoolhouse with a co-located rural post office is not a "town". Satellite view of coordinates shows a single farm. WP:GEOLAND is clearly failed. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Subject fails WP:GNG, WP:NMMA and WP:NBOX. Not having WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS, WP:RS where by the subject is talk about i length and in dept and not passing mentioned for WP:V. Sources talking about announcements and results of fights are considered routing report and can not be contribute to the subject notability. Cassiopeiatalk 23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (All the sources given are primary sources from the subject's organisation, except for a mention in a local newspaper I am unable to verify. Gerstenberger's opinion is also cited in this CBC article as one of a plethora of Hamilton residents' comments on steel production. However, in my opinion neither of these secondary sources are notable mentions, and Gerstenberger's role as president of a local union and minor communist party do not seem to be notable enough on their own. Yue🌙 04:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Doesn't satisfy even WP:ANYBIO, citations only talk about the fashion week and lack of full coverage for the subject. Htanaungg (talk) 03:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Badly sourced BLP. My own searches yielded a passing mention in Noroeste and the usual database sources like BeSoccer and Soccerway. He has an extremely common name so there might be WP:SIGCOV out there somewhere but I'm really struggling and this article has been in a dreadful state since 2016 so an AfD is overdue. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (PROD removed by creator on the basis that "It met the criteria at the time of it's creation". However, radio stations must meet the general notability guideline, requiring "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Lacking any secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 18:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) ("City-recognized tribes" are not a thing. A Google search of the term generates only three websites: Wikipedia itself and two Filipino websites. Editor has been promoting their organization the "Una Nation" throughout Wikipedia. WP:OR, WP:PROMO, WP:NotabilityYuchitown (talk) 15:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)Yuchitown)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Copy of List of school districts in Oklahoma with no need to have two distinct articles when the first one already divides schools up by County. Most - if not all - other states only have one article in the form of List of school districts in XXXXXXXEpluribusunumyall (talk) 00:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 2 d) (Article has one citation, is extremely undue as it suggests disputed social groups known as colectivos are terrorist in nature and relies solely on the opinion of the Venezuelan opposition. No other groups or states make the suggestions made in this article. WMrapids (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This article about Vinheteiro fails to meet WP:NMUSIC.
Details about Vinheteiro in the article are not cited in accordance with source, which makes it seem to have reach the requirement of WP:NMUSICe.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro participated in Brazilian programs such as Jornal Nacional (seems to meet criteria 12), while the source 'Jornal Nacional' was about his video of playing of JN's theme song went viral.
e.g. the article stated that Vinheteiro performed in China with local musicians (seems to meet criteria 4), yet the source was about his videos' popularity on Chinese online video platform, Bilibili, where he launched online music courses.
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not "inherently" notable just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of third-party reliable sources covering and analyzing their work -- but after stripping numerous unacceptable sources of the "film sourced to its own directory entry in IMDb" variety (which is not support for notability at all), what's left is one unreliable source reporting that he won an award at a minor local film festival that isn't prominent enough to clinch "notability because award" -- that's looking for major film festivals like Cannes, Berlin, Venice, TIFF or Sundance whose award announcements get covered as news, not just any film festival that exists on the planet -- and one film review in a source that's fine for use but not widely distributed enough to get him or the film over GNG all by itself. In fact, the film's article got draftspaced last year for lacking properly substantiated evidence of notability over and above the same single film review, and then got deleted as a stale draft without ever seeing any further improvement. The two films I've bundled here are also both referenced entirely to primary sources rather than reliable or notability-building ones. There's one film, Roobha, that I'm not bundling, as it actually does have reliable sources present in it — but it's still not at all clear that it has enough sourcing to clear the bar, so no prejudice against somebody else listing it for a separate AFD discussion in the future. Nothing present in any of these articles is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be referenced better than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (I cannot find any references to the Orchestra after 2012 - and the earlier ones are merely passing references to its existence. Newhaven lad (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:NBUILDING. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable article. Attempted to PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock/blocked editor). Ckfasdf (talk) 06:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Alvino Kusumabrata (Indonesian journalist, writer, and painter (born 2004))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:JOURNALIST. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable BPL. Proposed for PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock) Ckfasdf (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2012.
I looked at the 7 other languages pages, and they either had no citations or the citations were not usable toward notability requirements (primary/database/etc). DonaldD23talk to me 13:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NCORP, coverage is of "top startups" variety and reprints partnership announcements. The best coverage is of the Times Square billboard incident, but it's really not about the company, it's an action by its co-founder, and notability is not inherited. ~ A412talk! 17:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
Zhuan Zhu (Chinese assassin of King Liao of Wu (died 515 BC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Subject is not notable and BIO1E applies. I could find pre-Wikipedia sources like this and this but they only mention him as the assassin of King Liao. This seemingly can't be draftified and redirects are costly. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This one sentence biography article has zero references, and is not sufficient to establish notability. The Japanese Wikipedia article for the person has just one cite, insufficient to be notable. After searching, found social media, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of the person. Article was created on 22 January 2005 JoeNMLC (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (sourcing is very minor (mention in news site, a book, and a newspaper), and the roles in movies aren't meeting notability. She wasafairy 21:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (I don't want to individually nominate every page in [[Category:Presbyterian denominations in South Korea]], even though none of them seem individually notable. It would flood the AfD log, so consider this a stand-in nomination since there's not really a way to nominate multiple articles at once with Twinkle. DrowssapSMM 01:59, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War (the second stage of the Chinese Civil War between the Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist Party for the leadership of China)
GoldWitness, the English and Chinese Wikipedias don't have to line up perfectly. Links between Chinese and English articles are meant to link the two articles with the most similar subject matter, not exact twins. This is a natural result of the fact that English and Chinese historians describe this period of history differently, and group the events differently.
If it's decided this article is necessary, GoldWitness please see these instructions on how to do it properly: WP:CORRECTSPLITSilverStar54 (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Cannot identify any sources on Google Scholar, Google News, and Google Books. General search also brings up nothing that can establish notability. There may be information that can establish notability in Korean. If notability can't be established then content could be merged with Byeon Sang-byeokTraumnovelle (talk) 07:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (There do not appear to be any source that indicate this musician is worth to attention. The reliability of source 1 is unknown and the website does not adequately describe the musician. Source 2 is his band's website. Source 3 and 4 basically mention him by name only. 日期20220626 (talk) 07:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Poor sourcing on the page, little else found which counts towards the inclusion criteria on en.wiki
A redirect seems unhelpful given there are other communities with similar/identical names so it would require a move first. Nothing much to merge to Anglican Church in JapanJMWt (talk) 10:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (This article is about the mother of Elaine and Angela Chao. Though the article itself appears fleshed out and well-sourced at first glance, taking some time to read through it, I call into question whether Ruth is notable per GNG. More than half of the article pertains to her personal life, the events of which are not themselves notable. The only other section, "Philanthropy", includes only buildings named after her posthumously, due to donations from her husband and daughters, including a building at the Harvard Business School.
There are 18 cited sources. Of those, nine are from the HBS website. Two are from the Foremost Group, an organization headed by her daughter Angela. One is a news story covering Angela's death. One is an obituary of her other daughter, Jeannette. Two are Ruth's obituaries - one is clearly just a death announcement. The other is called "Chao's mother mourned", explicitly defining her notability solely in relation to her daughter Elaine. One source is just about Elaine's comments on the Green Line expansion, ten years after Ruth's death. There is one source (#14) honoring Ruth (again, posthumously) and her husband as philanthropists, however this link is defunct. In addition, the source appears to be a press release from the organization that gave them the award. This is a nothing article. Thesixthstaff (talk) 15:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2015.
PROD removed because one of the other languages has citations, but looking at them they are either primary or mention the show in passing. DonaldD23talk to me 13:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Highly promotional and no establishment of notability with independent WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 17:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-15
Yuan Yuan (actor) (Chinese actor, director and producer (born 1953))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (The article (more of a filmography list) has no inline citation. Has no corresponding article in any other wiki (rare for a foreign actor). Has one generic external link reference. The majority of the roles played by the actor were minor and were part of mostly non-notable works. I was unable to find any significant in-depth coverage from reliable publications (in English) that warrants GNG or WP:NACTOR. If anyone's able to find sources in foreign languages, please list them. X (talk) 03:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article doesn't have any citations, only a few "sources" listed. The winner of the election isn't even notable enough for a page, why then is the election? The city itself is a suburb of Yokohama and has a population of about 58,087, this would be fine, but the article gives me no reason to believe the elections of Zushi are actually notable. The article does not appear to be included on the Japanese Language Wikipedia either. Delete. Samoht27 (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Cannot find any contemproray references online - although there may be some in untranslated chinese. He does not appear in a search of the English language website of the Chingqing medical hospital. I appreciate that his page may need to stay in Wikipedia because of his academic reputation - but I cannot find any sources to justify the statements about his reputation made in the article. Newhaven lad (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Played in just one professional game before disappearing. Searching in Korean and Japanese, I was only able to find FC Gifu, which is not an independent source, and a bunch of database sources. I can't find anything that would meet WP:SPORTBASIC #5. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 00:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The Transnistria War was not a war like the one in for example Ukraine right now, with battles, large scale campaigns and offensives. Transnistria is a small sliver of land along a river with like seven towns. The Transnistria War was mostly clashing in the streets or in the bridges separating Transnistria and Moldova proper between civilians, policemen and informal militias of differing ideologies. There were no professional soldiers. There's actually not that much to write about and there were no proper battles.
The only exception was the battle of Tighina (1992) when Russian forces crossed the river I mentioned before and entered a Moldovan town with tanks and armored vehicles. Reliable sources recognize this difference, we have 20 results for "Battle of Tighina" or "Bender" (the town has two alternate names) [16] and 0 results for "Battle of Dubăsari" [17]. This article is WP:Original research and splitting this small war into the few towns it happened in is not productive. Take notice that the subsection #Cocieri-Dubăsari area occupies a third of Transnistria War#Military conflict.
Also worth mentioning are the article's contents. The infobox says one timeframe which is actually a small fraction of the article. Most of the article is either clashes between civilians/policemen rather than a proper military conflict or larger political events. Some of the covered clashes aren't even about the town of Dubăsari but about the province (Dubăsari District). There's also a lot of unsourced content. The article is quite a mess. With all this I propose the deletion of this article. SuperΨDro 18:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are OBITs with all the normal problems. BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Negligible mention of the battle in the acceptable sources listed here. Most of the article appears to be written from the Gurbilas Patshahi, which is a primary source and has been explicitly deprecated by admins-[18]. The two other sources, Hari Ram Gupta and Fauja Singh's work, make only passing mention of this battle; both are short paragraphs, and are identical to one another. Tony Jacques' source is a tertiary one, with thousands of short entries related to thousands of battles spanning fom Europe to the Americas to Africa to Asia which took place over hundreds of years. It too only contains a few sentences about this battle. This event clearly does not deserve an entire Wikipedia article. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 04:47, 23 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 3 d) (Does not appear to meet WP:NCOMPANY. Although the presented sources are reliable, coverage is nothing more than WP:ROUTINE. Hitro talk 07:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This was a plan that never actually happened. The plan had some coverage, but not enough, and I am not sure how ambiguous a name like this is for a tall building. Boleyn (talk) 16:50, 24 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (8 k, 5 d) (The originator of this article has been blocked for sockpuppetry, and the content from previous socks has been shown to be biased, lacking in neutrality as they admit in their unblock request that they were here with a political agenda of exposing something instead of building encyclopedia. These subjects are already addressed in articles on Military coups in Pakistan, and each election article discusses allegations of rigging such as here. Several other editors have also expressed concerns, such as content failing verification. With such a vast article, it's impractical for anyone to meticulously review every piece of content against numerous sources. Therefore, it would be wise to delete it, saving volunteers countless hours. WP:TNT might apply here. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-Notable actor and journalist, failed in wikipedia general notability guideline Also, I noticed that this article has been accused of being a 'paid article' before, and the same argument was made in the last nomination as well. So I think now the editors should be allowed to decide. Thanks you. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 07:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
Chanuka Wijesundara (Sri Lankan-born Canadian entrepreneur and web developer)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Sources all appear to be WP:PRIMARY either interviews with the subject or clear press release republications. Promotional and fails WP:BIO. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Semi-advertorialized WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly referenced as passing notability criteria for filmmakers. As always, filmmakers are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to be shown to pass WP:GNG on reliable source coverage and analysis about them and their work -- but this article was "sourced" predominantly to IMDb and his own LinkedIn and streaming copies of his films on YouTube, which are not support for notability, and even the three footnotes I didn't strip are still primary sources that still aren't support for notability, with not even one hit of GNG-worthy third-party coverage shown. And the closest thing to a notability claim is that he won a minor local-interest award that isn't prominent enough to clinch passage of WP:ANYBIO all by itself. The notability test on Wikipedia, as always, doesn't hinge on saying that he did stuff -- it hinges on the amount of media coverage that he did or didn't get for doing stuff, and nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have media coverage. Bearcat (talk) 14:59, 2 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Nominating for deletion under WP: NOTDIRECTORY. The article consists almost entirely of a list of companies that have offices in the complex. The only source about the complex I could find was this, which isn't nearly enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not "inherently" notable just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of third-party reliable sources covering and analyzing their work -- but after stripping numerous unacceptable sources of the "film sourced to its own directory entry in IMDb" variety (which is not support for notability at all), what's left is one unreliable source reporting that he won an award at a minor local film festival that isn't prominent enough to clinch "notability because award" -- that's looking for major film festivals like Cannes, Berlin, Venice, TIFF or Sundance whose award announcements get covered as news, not just any film festival that exists on the planet -- and one film review in a source that's fine for use but not widely distributed enough to get him or the film over GNG all by itself. In fact, the film's article got draftspaced last year for lacking properly substantiated evidence of notability over and above the same single film review, and then got deleted as a stale draft without ever seeing any further improvement. The two films I've bundled here are also both referenced entirely to primary sources rather than reliable or notability-building ones. There's one film, Roobha, that I'm not bundling, as it actually does have reliable sources present in it — but it's still not at all clear that it has enough sourcing to clear the bar, so no prejudice against somebody else listing it for a separate AFD discussion in the future. Nothing present in any of these articles is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be referenced better than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for filmmakers. As always, film directors are not "inherently" notable just because their work exists, and have to show evidence of third-party reliable sources covering and analyzing their work -- but after stripping numerous unacceptable sources of the "film sourced to its own directory entry in IMDb" variety (which is not support for notability at all), what's left is one unreliable source reporting that he won an award at a minor local film festival that isn't prominent enough to clinch "notability because award" -- that's looking for major film festivals like Cannes, Berlin, Venice, TIFF or Sundance whose award announcements get covered as news, not just any film festival that exists on the planet -- and one film review in a source that's fine for use but not widely distributed enough to get him or the film over GNG all by itself. In fact, the film's article got draftspaced last year for lacking properly substantiated evidence of notability over and above the same single film review, and then got deleted as a stale draft without ever seeing any further improvement. The two films I've bundled here are also both referenced entirely to primary sources rather than reliable or notability-building ones. There's one film, Roobha, that I'm not bundling, as it actually does have reliable sources present in it — but it's still not at all clear that it has enough sourcing to clear the bar, so no prejudice against somebody else listing it for a separate AFD discussion in the future. Nothing present in any of these articles is "inherently" notable enough to exempt them from having to be referenced better than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article covers a combination of different topics, none of which warrant their own article. The article reads like a news report and isn't properly cited. There's a quotation about "reliable internet providers", but the source itself has nothing to do with internet providers or startups. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (non-notable per WP:NPROF, and does not seem to be meeting WP:GNG. Mentions in secondary source such as Indian Express are running.
Also,
Chairs/Positions held are non-notable, with multiple department heads/chairs in a single university, mostly on a rotational basis.
Publications are journals and chapters(as done by virtually all professors), not full books.
Secretary position in said society is below president, and is organisational in nature. User4edits (talk) 13:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Contested draft, so we're here. No evidence of N:ORG level coverage for this private medical school nor its journal. Explicitly do not recommend Drafting since creator has history of moving articles back StarMississippi 17:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article is based on a lot of primary sources. A search in google news and books yields very little, and not enough to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Cannot find anything of note online. The College may have relatively poor rankings (151/200 according to Collegedunia.com). No indication of interesting history or connections Newhaven lad (talk) 19:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Ambassador who doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. The citations in the article do not appear to pass WP:GNG, and the closest I could find with Google search was this one newspaper article, which looks a bit short and routine. It is my understanding that diplomats/ambassadors do not auto pass WP:NPOL or WP:ANYBIO. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This is one of 65 colleges affiliated to the Mononmaniam Sundarar University. I cannot find anything of particular note about the College (except what it says on its own website). Newhaven lad (talk) 13:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (The page previously used British-era texts which I removed as per the consensus for Raj-era sources. Now the page has been renamed as the "Pothohar Sultanate" which seems to be an entirely fictional title as a search on Google Scholar, JSTOR, Books etc shows that no such polity by that name has ever existed. For this reason, as the article's name is completely fictional and the article is unsourced, I propose that it be deleted. Ixudi (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (The absence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, means this does not meet the notability guideline WP:NSCHOOL. Of the cited sources: four are not independent (the college's web page, that of the university with which it is affiliated, that of the local government where it is located, and a press release about their annual sports day) - all the information is from the college. The remaining three (honoursadmission.com, locator.eduportalbd.com, and sohopathi.com) are self-published websites, with no reputation for fact checking or accuracy. Searches in English and Bengali found no better sources.
I would be fine with merge or redirect to the surrounding community, Dhamrai Upazila, but am bringing it to AfD because the creator has opposed such alternatives at another article they created, Kushura Abbas Ali High School, going so far as to revert redirection performed as the result of AfD consensus. Worldbruce (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources; the sources cited are either paid for, sponsored, or simply briefly mention the subject. GSS💬 13:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (This page was previously deleted in 2018 through the AFD process, but was recreated in 2021. However, it appears that the subject of the article still lacks notability on their own, as the positions mentioned in the infobox and lead are not considered notable. Additionally, the article violates Wikipedia's policy on WP:NPOV, and it's important to note that notability is not inherited. Saqib (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (The entirety of this article is written through primary, non WP:HISTRS sources. Sources like the Suraj Granth and Macaullife were explicitly deprecated here-[19]. Harinder Singh Mehboob's work is self published and the author is a poet, not a historian. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 12:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (All WP:RAJ era sources. Nishant Shashikant Sharma's source was published the International Journal of Research which has been deprecated as a predatory publisher as per here-[20]Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 20:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (A search for ""Pearl continental" gwadar -wikipedia" in google news shows almost all coverage from May 2019. Does not seem to have lasting coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (I could only find coverage from March 2014. No lasting effects or coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar (talk) 01:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Indiawin Sports (Indian sports team owner, subsidiary of Reliance Industries)
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (WP:NOTINHERITED. Just because they own a bunch of cricket teams, that doesn't mean that the company itself is notable enough. I don't see enough independent coverage of them (i.e. other than just saying they own these teams) to pass WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Karthik Naralasetty has some sources on his life and company, a 30 under 30 article and some promotional content, he won an award 13 years ago, I don't think it provides SIGCOV or establishes GNG.
I was going to PROD this article until I found that it not only has been PROD'd but has had two previous AFDs, one closed as Delete, the second as No consensus. The article on his company, SocialBlood was Soft Deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Socialblood. I thought it was time to reexamine this article and consider whether it meets the stricter standards of today's Wikipedia. LizRead!Talk! 01:12, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The film is obscure, undersourced and fails WP:NFILM. In fact the producer's son said, "even I don’t remember much of that film". Kailash29792(talk) 04:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (I believe the subject fails to meet GNG. This footballer played some international games but I cannot find any significant coverage of his life or career. MarchOfTheGreyhounds 19:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Playing football for a national team doesn't give automatic notability, so neither does coaching. This manager is covered in passing mentions only, failing the WP:SIGCOV guideline. No lasting impact on Bhutan whatsoever, so fails WP:SUSTAINED (as well as informal essays such as WP:IMPACT/WP:10YT). I can't find anything else about him; not his age, where he is from, if he was a player himself, other managerial jobs etc. Simply put, Henk Walk is not biography material and being a name in a list at Bhutan national football team#Coaching history should suffice. Geschichte (talk) 15:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (The article depicts a legendary tale involving two figures, devoid of any historical basis. It fails WP:GNG, and there are no reliable sources referring to it as the "Battle of Bahraich." The title is a fabricated name, and reputable sources do not classify it as a battle. Instead, numerous sources, including the parent article, refer to both figures as part of a legend. Failure to meet GNG criteria and its lack of connection to actual historical events, it is worth noting that no historian identifies it as the "Battle of Bahraich." Imperial[AFCND] 13:37, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for corporations, as explained in WP:NCORP and WP:ORGCRIT. WP:PROMO. Charlie (talk) 07:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 7 d) (Non-notable record label. Fails to meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. I could not find any sources on Google, and nothing has changed since the last AfD. – DreamRimmer (talk) 09:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not a notable or traditional secondary school. There is not enough information in the article. Md Joni Hossain (talk) 06:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Nominating this page for deletion again because it has remained overtly promotional and lacks merit of its own. In the last deletion discussion, some IDs might have been paid to submit a keep vote. Several of those accounts are either banned or inactive now. Notedolly2 (talk) 07:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (There is no claim to notability. The present sources show that the subject has not met WP:GNG. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (Soccerway stub on a footballer that played two matches before disappearing. My own searches yielded nothing better than Telegraph India, which mentions him in the title and an image caption but only once in the main article prose (so it's not WP:SIGCOV), and TOI, another match report that mentions him, this time his performance wasn't so good and the article mentions some mistakes he made but doesn't go into any depth about him as an individual. From the second article, we can perhaps make a presumption as to why his career was so short (although this would be WP:OR) but having a bad game, on its own, is not enough for WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG and I don't see any actual direct significant coverage of Khara. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This was nominated for deletion last month however this was kept, not sure why.. maybe because the nom was sock? anyways, this one is clearly promotional BLP about a non-notable advocate. as mentioned in the previous nom, there is no reference that is directly about him. Fails WP:GNG. Saqib (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-17
Ramm Bogadi (Indian actor and YouTube travel vlogger)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No evidence of notability. Sources are generally trivial or from social media or IMDB. Draftified twice to allow improvements to be made but returned to mainspace immediately by its author. No evidence for WP:GNGVelellaVelella Talk 15:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not notable due to WP:BLP1E and note that the other winners of Mrs. World do not have their own page, so precedent shows that there is no basis for creating a Wikipedia page just for women winning one low-profile marital pageant and doing nothing else with their reign. Fixthetyp0 (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. No reliable sources found despite Google search including news, books, and news archive. StartGrammarTime (talk) 04:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:BIO. No indication of significance. Previous deleted on 21 January 2024. scope_creepTalk 19:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Seems to fail WP:GNG, there are some announcements kind of sources, routine coverage and non-independent interview, but I fail to see any real independent SIGCOV about the person. Tehonk (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (All the coverage is from the time of the event in May 2017. No WP:LASTING coverage to meet WP:EVENT. LibStar (talk) 23:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:EVENT. All the sources are from February 2019 when this attack occurred. Source 7 actually predates the date of the attack. No WP:LASTING coverage. LibStar (talk) 23:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Fails WP:POLITICIAN for the lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. There is no reference to winning an election or being in a position of power in another party to qualify as a political activist WP:POLITICIAN ~ Spworld2 (talk) 10:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (6 k, 3 d) (Largely a WP:OR/WP:SYNTH reconstruction based on very old primary sources, about battles and sieges we don't have articles on, which were part of a 3 year campaign we don't have an article on, which was part of an 11 year war we don't have an article on. Fram (talk) 10:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No refs found in GBooks and GNews Archives. GNews hit says that a suspect from a drug den bust just happens to be from said baranggay. Alternatively, redirect to its town proper at Merida,_Leyte#Barangays --Lenticel(talk) 02:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG. All citations mention the show in passing, no indepth coverage. Could find nothing better in a search. DonaldD23talk to me 21:23, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (Appears to be a non-notable individual due to the lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sources primarily comprise passing mentions or interviews, which is also consistent with WP:BEFORE. Despite occasional appearances as a guest on TV shows, this alone does not establish notability. Additionally, the author appears to have a COI/UPE, considering their edit history. GSS💬 16:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-08
Sri Yala Batik (Batik producer's collective in Yala, Thailand)
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (The company doesn't seem notable as there is no significant coverage in third-party reliable sources. The sources found so far only briefly mention it, and checking WP:BEFORE reveals the same pattern of passing mentions. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. GSS💬 19:52, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Non-notable band, unsourced since ever. I would PROD but an IP just started editing it again (which is why I remembered it existed) and would likely be a waste of time. Primefac (talk) 12:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (The individual's name is currently a red link on Indonesian Wikipedia, indicating a lack of significant coverage as outlined in WP:SIGCOV. While he did serve as the chair of the local ulema council at one point, this appears to be the extent of his notable contributions. It is likely that his recognition is primarily limited to his local region. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Wisra Okarianto (Indonesian Islamic judge and civil servant (born 1971)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The individual serves as a government official within a third-level subdivision of Indonesia. The primary references in the article primarily revolve around his regional responsibilities and engagements, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC. Alternatively, some references focus on his familial relations, which do not contribute to the notability of the article per WP:INVALIDBIO. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Muhammad Yahman (Indonesian preacher and teacher (born 1968))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (The individual's name appears as a red link on Indonesian Wikipedia, indicating a lack of significant coverage as stipulated by WP:SIGCOV. Being a local preacher, it's probable that his recognition is confined to his immediate region. Ckfasdf (talk) 22:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (The individual in question serves as a government official in a third-level subdivision of Indonesia. The majority of references in her article pertain to her work within her region, lacking significant national coverage as required by WP:BASIC. Additionally, her designation as a lecturer potentially qualifies her as an academic, yet fails to meet the criteria outlined in WP:NACADEMIC. Ckfasdf (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Andris Wasono (Indonesian civil servant (born 1976))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Generally lack of notability and fails criteria set on WP:BASIC. Also, the article created by sock known for making non-notable BPL. Proposed for PROD earlier but blocked by IP editor (possibly sock) Ckfasdf (talk) 06:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Peter Nguyen Van Hung (Vietnamese Australian Catholic priest and human rights activist (born 1958))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Possible cross-wiki spam, noticed some 15 years ago already. I don't see notability; he is an activist but without major achievements. Nadzik (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:NONPROFIT guidelines state that organizations, including schools, must meet specific criteria. Firstly, their activities should have a national or international scope. Secondly, the organization must have received substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization. However, in the case of this school, there are only two references available, and they do not directly pertain to the school. Moreover, there is no evidence indicating that the school is known nationally. Ckfasdf (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (The article previously underwent AfD discussions in July-August 2023, resulting in a "soft delete" and subsequent deletion. However, it was recreated in November 2023 by the same article creator, who was confirmed as a sockpuppet. Despite its recreation, the current version of the article remains similar to its previous iteration from July 2023. Consequently, the arguments presented during the previous AfD remain applicable, highlighting the article's failure to meet the criteria outlined in WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
Siti Zainab (Indonesian actress, singer, dancer, and homemaker (193?–2014))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (The article underwent AfD discussions in July 2023, leading to a "soft delete." However, it was reinstated in December 2023 by the same article creator, confirmed as a sockpuppet. Despite its restoration, the article fails to address the issues that prompted its removal in July 2023, particularly regarding WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Notably, in the Filmography section, nearly all entries list her as uncredited. The one exception where she is credited only features her in a supporting role. Ckfasdf (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Once again, I'd like to propose the deletion of this article. Initially, my awareness of this unit arose from its presence on Wikipedia, prompting me to contribute and expand it beyond its initial stub status. However, I encountered significant challenges due to the scarcity of available sources. A search yielded only around 9-10 books, all of which contained very similar information, suggesting a common source, likely the oldest among them. Furthermore, the information from these books has already been incorporated into the article, resulting in a mere three-sentence paragraph.
Moreover, my efforts to find reliable Indonesian-language sources proved unfruitful, despite the unit's affiliation with the Indonesian military. I expected to find references to it within documents from the Indonesian National Armed Forces or Indonesian Navy, or possibly in the archives of the National Archives of Indonesia if it held historical significance. However, my inquiries only led to wiki-like websites and forums, all drawing from the same pool of information found in the books.
While the term "gurita" (octopus) is commonly used within Indonesian navy contexts, associations with units such as the 5th Marine Infantry Battalion, which bears the nickname "Gurita Cakti," and naval special force task force known as Satgas Gurita, a military training codename for operations like hostage rescue, counterterrorism, and securing critical facilities (see 1 for reference), both appear unrelated to the unit in question.
Consequently, I am inclined to believe that this unit may be fictitious, with the information provided in the books possibly stemming from a misunderstanding or error. It's important to acknowledge that even reliable sources are not infallible. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Attempted to verify location for disambiguating: there does not appear to be a Panglong in this coordinate location or in Muse Township nearby. Google Earth source cited doesn't show it, Mapcarta source shows it but does not meet WP:GEOLAND. There are other Panglong-named villages in northern Shan State, but the closest recognized by the General Administration Department is about 28 miles south of stated coords in Hsenwi Township (according to this MIMU map and place codes databaseEmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 18:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Attempted to verify location for disambiguating: there does not appear to be a Panglong in this coordinate location or in Muse Township nearby. Google Earth source cited doesn't show it, Mapcarta source shows it but does not meet WP:GEOLAND. There are other Panglong-named villages in northern Shan State, but the closest recognized by the General Administration Department is about 49 miles southwest of stated coords in Kutkai Township (according to this MIMU map and place codes database). EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 18:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (tagged as unreferenced and promotional since 2018. GSearch only provided directories and social media sites. GNews, GBooks and GNews Archives did not turn any substantial sources either. Normally I would suggest redirect to Calauan per WP:ATD but there's no Educational institutions section there to point to. -Lenticel(talk) 00:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-16
Pinas (newspaper) (Weekly newspaper published in Makati, Philippines)
Article cites three outlets, which I've machine translated. All article are fluff pieces on the subject, which is fine and can help constitute notability, but Emek seems wholly unreliable. Ynet is probably reliable. I would lean unreliable with Mida. Remsense诉 15:12, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-12
Uptown School (Private elementary/middle/high school in Dubai, United Arab Emirates)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Previously declined prod. I could not find coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. Note there are other schools in the world with the same name. LibStar (talk) 04:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Only primary sources provided. A search for sources did not yield coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 23:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This should be a redirect to Blue Line (Dubai Metro); as an unopened subway station with no secondary coverage (or references at all), it fails WP:GNG and WP:CRYSTAL, but the WP:BLAR has been repeatedly reverted, so here we are. ~ A412talk! 15:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 3 d) (No notability, Real estate dealer. I don't think he has a place on Wikipedia. Otherwise any property owner could get an article. Tapal2024 (talk) 20:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
Ali al-Jarrah (Lebanese man accused of spying on Israel (born 1958))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (As noted by another user, coverage does not extend beyond arrest and legal consequences. Significant coverage implies that the subject has been featured in multiple sources over a period of time, contributing to a well-rounded biography.)
2024-03-17
Jana Pareigis (German journalist and television moderator)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No independent sources - Altenmann>talk 22:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable amateur/local brass band. I can find nothing to indicate that the subject of this (effectively orphaned) article meets WP:SIGCOV or WP:NBAND. In terms of SIGCOV, and after exhaustive searches (for reliable/independent sources to expand the article beyond the single/primary source we have), the only coverage I can find are passing mentions in regional papers - like these listingsentries in the Belfast Telegraph. And "local interest" stories in similar papers - like this in the News Letter). And passing mentions (in articles about people connected to the subject) - like these onlinepieces in the local news website Northernirelandworld.com. I can find no coverage at all by the BBC or other non-local outlets. Google searches (for various combinations of the subject's name) barely return a few hundred results. Mainly the subject's own website, social channels and this Wikipedia article and its mirrors. That we need to rely entirely on primary sources, to establish even the basic facts, suggests that SIGCOV is not met. The NBAND issues are self evident. This local amateur brass band hasn't charted or released an album on a major label. And coming 2nd in a very specific category in a North of Ireland Bands' Association competition is objectively not success in "a major music award"... I have reviewed possible WP:ATDs. But draftifying this ancient article serves no purpose and I can't recommend redirection anywhere (like to Carrickfergus - as there is no related section and creating one would give UNDUE weight/preference to a single otherwise non-notable local community group). I, frankly, can't fathom why this article was created in the first place. Its original incarnation reads entirely like WP:NOTWEBHOST content.... Guliolopez (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) Guliolopez (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The Transnistria War was not a war like the one in for example Ukraine right now, with battles, large scale campaigns and offensives. Transnistria is a small sliver of land along a river with like seven towns. The Transnistria War was mostly clashing in the streets or in the bridges separating Transnistria and Moldova proper between civilians, policemen and informal militias of differing ideologies. There were no professional soldiers. There's actually not that much to write about and there were no proper battles.
The only exception was the battle of Tighina (1992) when Russian forces crossed the river I mentioned before and entered a Moldovan town with tanks and armored vehicles. Reliable sources recognize this difference, we have 20 results for "Battle of Tighina" or "Bender" (the town has two alternate names) [21] and 0 results for "Battle of Dubăsari" [22]. This article is WP:Original research and splitting this small war into the few towns it happened in is not productive. Take notice that the subsection #Cocieri-Dubăsari area occupies a third of Transnistria War#Military conflict.
Also worth mentioning are the article's contents. The infobox says one timeframe which is actually a small fraction of the article. Most of the article is either clashes between civilians/policemen rather than a proper military conflict or larger political events. Some of the covered clashes aren't even about the town of Dubăsari but about the province (Dubăsari District). There's also a lot of unsourced content. The article is quite a mess. With all this I propose the deletion of this article. SuperΨDro 18:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (So I am not really familiar with football topics in Wikipedia. But something tells me the football team of a village populated by 2,085 people is not notable. This article has two sources one of which is a general Hungarian football directory and the other is the team's official website. I don't think this football team is notable. SuperΨDro 00:24, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Fails GNG and NEVENT. Nothing found from WP:IS WP:RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Article is sourced mainly from a medieval chronicle. Other sources either fail WP:RS or are brief mentions. Nothing with SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 01:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Despite having achieved two medals, I couldn't find enough significant coverage of this bobsleigh athlete that would meet WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Everything that came up in my searches are brief mentions (TVP Sport and Wrocław Naszemiasto), as well as silly, random namesakes. Corresponding article on Polish Wikipedia article has been tagged for not having sources except external links for 14 years; no major edits since 2022. CuteDolphin712 (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Only example listed is for someone without their own article without a source to back it up. Not significant enough for its own article. BangJan1999 17:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are OBITs with all the normal problems. BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NOLY or any other pertinent category, came 9th in only race participated in. Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 14:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 0 d) (It's a person who became a teacher then a headteacher. I see that there is an entry in an Australian biographical dictionary but I'm not really seeing what the claim to notability is in terms of the en.wiki inclusion criteria. JMWt (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-16
Václav Sršeň (Czechoslovak footballer (1925–1996))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Zero secondary sources. Does not meet WP:NORG, lacking 'significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" AusLondonder (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Not recognised by ARBA or BRC, no reliable source talks about it from my search. Might have more information available in Swedish under the name Sverigehare. Not to be confused with Lepus timidus which is referred to as the Swedish hare in some sources. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (The subject of the article does not appear to meet WP:BASIC as I cannot find any sources which make more than a passing mention of Hedman. The existing article could be expanded with a list of works he has created, but secondary sources do not exist to expand the prose of the article beyond its current contents. Uffda608 (talk) 12:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Inferior duplicate of a more complete template already transcludef at River Lea. No need for a standalone list. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 13:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Not convinced of notability here. I don't think that everyone who has been stripped of their knighthood is notable enough. BangJan1999 21:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Footballer who has played on the Finnish third tier. This not being professional by any means, the BLP needs strong sources to support the counter-intuitive claim that the player has significant coverage (as opposed to WP:ROUTINE/WP:MILL/local news). The two sources from Keski-Uusimaa.fi are paywalled, but look like a match report and a pre-match report respectively. Geschichte (talk) 16:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Surrey First (Civic organization leading Surrey City Council)
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Article about a municipal political party represented on a single suburban city council, not properly sourced as passing WP:ORGDEPTH. As always, political parties are not "inherently" notable just because they exist -- notability hinges on media coverage about their activities, not just on verifying their existence. But this is referenced almost entirely to content self-published by the city council itself, which isn't support for notability at all -- and while one footnote does come from a real WP:GNG-worthy media outlet, ORGDEPTH and GNG both militate that one hit of media coverage isn't enough in and of itself. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
The Circle Club (Private members' club in central Manchester, England)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable nightclub. Article has been an orphan since creation in 2007 and its references are thin. WP:BEFORE reveals only basic local press coverage of this venue, mostly related to its closure. Flip Format (talk) 14:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Little on the page to suggest this cleric meets the inclusion standards. Middle ranking Anglican clerics do not have assumed notability JMWt (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article created and continues to be edited by COI editor who removed PROD tag on the basis that "We are in the process of editing this page, but we need the copy to be authorised, which can not be done in the timescale that you have provided, it will be carried out soon,".
The organisation lacks "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", as a result failing WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Article about a hospital radio presenter created originally by a COI editor and filled with unencyclopedic trivia. Nothing of note here other than routine local human-interest news coverage of the presenter. WP:BEFORE reveals no rich untapped seam of coverage of the individual. Flip Format (talk) 21:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (I don't see how this article doesn't violate WP:SYNTHESIS. Ignoring the blatant MOS:ACCESS issues with the tables (which I could address), these tables constitute original research and an assemblage of indiscriminate statistics. The very first table, for example, simply shows that Russia has won a gold medal in each of the listed events, but not how many, and then an unsourced total on the right column. Additionally, synchronized skating is (unfortunately) a separate entity from other figure skating disciplines. This is another example of someone treating Wikipedia like a figure skating fan wiki. Bgsu98(Talk) 00:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Starting a formal AfD as an editor objects to this article being a redirect. This group's claim to fame is their Eurovision Song Contest 2016 appearance, and all references included in the article and through an internet search appear to pertain to that appearance. Per WP:ONEEVENT, I propose a redirect to Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2016, which is a good article and includes all notable endeavors by this group in greater detail and with additional context. Grk1011 (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (This article is a terribly written synthesis of ideas relating to corruption in Greek football. Angryapathy (talk) 18:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Visoki Dečani (Cultural heritage monument of Kosovo)
AfD (7 k, 0 d) (Contains unverified information that loses the neutrality of the article Kokenspun (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (I think that this article should be reverted to its pre-existing redirect to Members_of_the_Red_Army_Faction#Third_generation_Red_Army_Faction_(1982–1993) on WP:BLPCRIME and GNG considerations. In contrast to other 3rd generation RAF members Daniela Klette and Ernst-Volker Staub, Garweg has not actually been convicted of any crime. Coverage is fleeting, exclusively in the context of suspected activities in the third-generation RAF, and the stronger of the cited sources, Der Spiegel solely frames criminal charges against Garweg beyond association with the third-generation RAF in attribution to the authorities rather than as statements of fact, as well as stating that little is known about Burkhard Garweg (Über Burkhard Garweg ist nur wenig bekannt). signed, Rosguilltalk 15:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Google search results are drowned out by results about Hava Nagila. Does not appear to have significant coverage from secondary sources.
May be notable from chart placements as lead or featured artists. Schrödinger's jellyfish✉ 17:10, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Only an IMDb link on the page, de.wiki doesn't appear to offer RS which would meet the notability standards here. I don't speak German but I'm not seeing much which could be considered JMWt (talk) 10:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing a way to verify the information and it seems way beyond the point where there needs to be verified information from RS to keep the page JMWt (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (This article seems to be about an imaginary event. It confuses two different things - (i) the outbreak of the Belgian Revolution in a series of riots in Brussels on 25 August 1830 and (ii) a genuine "siege" (or at least a battle inside Brussels) in mid-September 1830 known as the "September Days". Given the lack of sourced content and the basic confusion about scope which prevents improvement, I propose that deletion of this article seems the most straightforward way to remediate. —Brigade Piron (talk) 08:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Only primary sources provided. A search for sources did not yield coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. LibStar (talk) 23:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Most of the relevant information on the Order-State of Burgundy is either not cited or comes from discussion board. The main citations are to discussion boards which are not considered Reliable sources and violate policies of No original research and Verifiability. Their are no reliable sources fo information I can find on it online for the topic. It appears to be related more to an online game "Hearts of Iron" Myotus (talk) 19:31, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Notability only through her sons, and WP:NOTINHERITED. Present on 2 other projects, but they are entitled to make different decision. There is some evidence of being a benefactor (supporting the local parish), but that itself was inherited. The pages of Wilhelm and Alexander seem sufficiently well-developed that a merge wouldn't be helpful. Klbrain (talk) 18:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Article has had zero secondary sources since creation. Struggling to find significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:NORG. AusLondonder (talk) 12:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No evidence of notability found, sources in article are primary, other sources are routine or passing. Article is one of a group of quid-pro-quo promo pieces between the Field Naturalist Clubs in Victoria, Australia and Wikimedia Australia, created by one and moved back out of draft (against the COI/PAID guidelines) by a paid member of the other. Fram (talk) 12:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (I could not find significant coverage of him to meet WP:BIO. Also does not meet WP:PROF, google scholar comes up with a namesake who is an expert in sexual health. LibStar (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Previous AfD was no consensus. However, some suggested merging/moving to Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Foundation but that now redirects here. I still believes he fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG on every level. Most of the citations fail verification. Prod was contested with reasoning that significant coverage exists in books, good faith search found that is not the case. Spagooder (talk) 05:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I didn't find sufficient sources through a WP:BEFORE which went into significant detail to pass WP:GNG. While he was the lead in Worst Year of My Life Again I don't think he passes WP:NACTOR as he hasn't had multiple significant roles. A possible redirect could be to Worst Year of My Life Again. Suonii180 (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (There is a lack of substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources that discuss the subject in depth. The current cited sources include passing mentions, a contributor piece, and an announcement of her inclusion in the 100 Women of Influence 2016 list, which does not automatically confer notability. Although a Google news search yielded some sources, they primarily consist of passing mentions or self-published materials, none of which establish independent notability. GSS💬 16:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (An orphan article. Fails WP:CORP. A search in google news yielded little. LibStar (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
Sophie Kovic (Entrepreneur and social media personality)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:GNG, and Seed & Sprout fails WP:NCORP. Non-notable awards and local interviews are the only coverage. ~ A412talk! 17:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (It's a person who became a teacher then a headteacher. I see that there is an entry in an Australian biographical dictionary but I'm not really seeing what the claim to notability is in terms of the en.wiki inclusion criteria. JMWt (talk) 10:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 0 d) (It's a person who became a teacher then a headteacher. I see that there is an entry in an Australian biographical dictionary but I'm not really seeing what the claim to notability is in terms of the en.wiki inclusion criteria. JMWt (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 3 d) (Does not appear to meet WP:NCOMPANY. Although the presented sources are reliable, coverage is nothing more than WP:ROUTINE. Hitro talk 07:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (Only reliable source I could identify is Tiroler Tageszeitung. But the article appears to be about Lyoness, which already had an article at Lyoness although lead states now myWorld. (Speedy deletion was contested) IgelRM (talk) 23:03, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (This article has been limping along for years as a perma-stub, and in that time only one citation to a reliable source that is independent from the subject has been found: Kinna 2012, p. 357 (this source provides only a single sentence of information about it, in a long list of other organisations). Looking through Google Scholar,[23] I haven't been able to find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Most of the sources found are from members of the organisation (i.e. Tom Wetzel), or authors connected directly to the organisation (i.e. Workers' Solidarity Movement) or are false positives (i.e. Emma Goldman). Others only provide passing mentions to the WSA, in longer lists of other organisations (i.e. Gustavo Rodriguez, Robert Hlatky).
Henrybuilt (American design and manufacturing company)
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Realtively small company making kitchens and furniture with no particularly notable features. No obvious ways of linking to other Wikipedia pages Newhaven lad (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 3 d) (Hyper-local niche family owned grocery store with mere three stores in the Portland, Oregon metro area. Fails WP:NCORP Coverages are all routine and hyper-local. Graywalls (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Like his father, Alfred Cowles Jr., good sourcing is lacking. Reads like a genealogical entry. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (I've done some research into Druxy's and it doesn't seem to be notable at all. If you search in Google News, they only mention a few things such as an acquisition and a listeria incident. Indeed, I would even say that this coverage is merely trivial.
Also, Williams Fresh Cafe doesn't even have its own article on Wikipedia.
If there's any new info about its notability feel free to share it otherwise, this article should be deleted. Thank you. WizardGamer775 (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (There is a Turkish company called Atlas Energy (Atlas Enerji in Turkish) but this one does not seem to have enough sources to be notable Chidgk1 (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Founder of a non-notable company. Article has been tagged for improvements since 2019 and is largely unsourced. Subject has appeared on Forbes' "30 under 30" list, but I'm not sure if this is enough for establishing notability. CycloneYoristalk! 04:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Kept at previous AfD based in part due to conduct of nom, this company does not meet WP:ORGCRIT. Zero secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (No establishment of notability using independent WP:RS. Amigao (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-12
Maritime Page (Website dedicated to maritime industry information and insights)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not yet notable per WP:WEB. It is used as a source in the RUSI and Bellingcat pages cited, but not actually mentioned. In a WP:BEFORE search I could only find passing mentions of the site in three BusinessWorld articles , citing it for the number of shipyards in the Philippines in 2021: [24][25][26]. Wikishovel (talk) 09:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 3 d) (Non-notable (fails WP:GNG) and promotional. There are sources, but they are not reliable. Moreover, stricter scrutininy should be given to them per WP:NCORP and WP:ORGIND. Local Variable (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NCORP, coverage is of "top startups" variety and reprints partnership announcements. The best coverage is of the Times Square billboard incident, but it's really not about the company, it's an action by its co-founder, and notability is not inherited. ~ A412talk! 17:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
Sophie Kovic (Entrepreneur and social media personality)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:GNG, and Seed & Sprout fails WP:NCORP. Non-notable awards and local interviews are the only coverage. ~ A412talk! 17:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This "social enterprise" does not seem to have enough significant coverage or reliable sources to meet WP:NORG. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines for corporations, as explained in WP:NCORP and WP:ORGCRIT. WP:PROMO. Charlie (talk) 07:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article created and continues to be edited by COI editor who removed PROD tag on the basis that "We are in the process of editing this page, but we need the copy to be authorised, which can not be done in the timescale that you have provided, it will be carried out soon,".
The organisation lacks "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", as a result failing WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Coverage is routine and lacking significant independent reporting (mostly interviews). It does not meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 22:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (All of the sources currently on the page are either primary sources, unreliable, or not in-depth. In a WP:BEFORE[27] was the only independent mention that I could be sure was the same company, and only in passing. [28] Is a press release. All of the reliable sources that I could find to support meeting WP:NCORP were for other companies with similar names. Shaws username . talk . 14:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article has been tagged with unresolved referencing issues for 11 years. I think it's now time to evaluate it for deletion.
The article currently has one reference. I've scanned Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, and newspapers.com and can only find one additional reference in WP:RS, here [29] where it's mentioned in one sentence as the organizer of a conference.
It notes some WP:N "advisors," however, gives no source to WP:V if they really are "advisors" and that probably doesn't matter anyway due to WP:NOTINHERITED.
It's fashionable nowadays to start "think tanks" that are basically blogs or white paper publishing platforms and this appears to be one of those. (Insofar as it's something like that, it seems to be fine and might even be WP:RS, but that's separate from question of its N.) Its Form 990 [30] indicates it has a single employee who appears to be a grad student at Stony Brook University. Chetsford (talk) 02:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC); edited 06:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Not notable per WP:NSCHOOL, that is, per WP:ORG or WP:GNG. All I can find about it online is similar to what's here: passing mentions in articles about other things, and routine school listings. Proposed deletion last week was contested without comment by the article creator. Wikishovel (talk) 09:37, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (This article has been limping along for years as a perma-stub, and in that time only one citation to a reliable source that is independent from the subject has been found: Kinna 2012, p. 357 (this source provides only a single sentence of information about it, in a long list of other organisations). Looking through Google Scholar,[31] I haven't been able to find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Most of the sources found are from members of the organisation (i.e. Tom Wetzel), or authors connected directly to the organisation (i.e. Workers' Solidarity Movement) or are false positives (i.e. Emma Goldman). Others only provide passing mentions to the WSA, in longer lists of other organisations (i.e. Gustavo Rodriguez, Robert Hlatky).
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Preparatory school lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" required per WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 18:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Contested draft, so we're here. No evidence of N:ORG level coverage for this private medical school nor its journal. Explicitly do not recommend Drafting since creator has history of moving articles back StarMississippi 17:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article is based on a lot of primary sources. A search in google news and books yields very little, and not enough to meet WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This is one of 65 colleges affiliated to the Mononmaniam Sundarar University. I cannot find anything of particular note about the College (except what it says on its own website). Newhaven lad (talk) 13:09, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 2 d) (Does not meet WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Currently has no secondary sources whatsoever. AusLondonder (talk) 23:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (The absence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, means this does not meet the notability guideline WP:NSCHOOL. Of the cited sources: four are not independent (the college's web page, that of the university with which it is affiliated, that of the local government where it is located, and a press release about their annual sports day) - all the information is from the college. The remaining three (honoursadmission.com, locator.eduportalbd.com, and sohopathi.com) are self-published websites, with no reputation for fact checking or accuracy. Searches in English and Bengali found no better sources.
I would be fine with merge or redirect to the surrounding community, Dhamrai Upazila, but am bringing it to AfD because the creator has opposed such alternatives at another article they created, Kushura Abbas Ali High School, going so far as to revert redirection performed as the result of AfD consensus. Worldbruce (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Contested PROD. Subject is a local elementary school with no apparent notability beyond being named for a Starbucks executive, which is a good chunk of the article and its sources. The sources that do focus on the school are from a local newspaper, the school district, or state databases, thus not meeting WP:GNG. SounderBruce 20:51, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (I have carried out WP:BEFORE for this article about a headteacher and classicist, and added a passing reference in the local paper. I cannot see coverage to meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO or WP:NAUTHOR. Tacyarg (talk) 11:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-12
Uptown School (Private elementary/middle/high school in Dubai, United Arab Emirates)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Previously declined prod. I could not find coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. Note there are other schools in the world with the same name. LibStar (talk) 04:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (WP:NONPROFIT guidelines state that organizations, including schools, must meet specific criteria. Firstly, their activities should have a national or international scope. Secondly, the organization must have received substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organization. However, in the case of this school, there are only two references available, and they do not directly pertain to the school. Moreover, there is no evidence indicating that the school is known nationally. Ckfasdf (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Little on the page to suggest this cleric meets the inclusion standards. Middle ranking Anglican clerics do not have assumed notability JMWt (talk) 09:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No indication of notability. Article is strongly promotional, including phone and fax (!) numbers. AusLondonder (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (tagged as unreferenced and promotional since 2018. GSearch only provided directories and social media sites. GNews, GBooks and GNews Archives did not turn any substantial sources either. Normally I would suggest redirect to Calauan per WP:ATD but there's no Educational institutions section there to point to. -Lenticel(talk) 00:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not a notable or traditional secondary school. There is not enough information in the article. Md Joni Hossain (talk) 06:33, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Cannot find any reference to Math-U-See - other than advertisments for the materials. It may have won awards from Home Schooling organsations but I cannot find any firm evidence of that. Newhaven lad (talk) 19:38, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG and WP:NORG. No reliable sources found despite Google search including news, books, and news archive. StartGrammarTime (talk) 04:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
History and Society/History
AfD date
Article
AfD nomination
2024-03-13
Visoki Dečani (Cultural heritage monument of Kosovo)
AfD (7 k, 0 d) (Contains unverified information that loses the neutrality of the article Kokenspun (talk) 19:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (6 k, 3 d) (Largely a WP:OR/WP:SYNTH reconstruction based on very old primary sources, about battles and sieges we don't have articles on, which were part of a 3 year campaign we don't have an article on, which was part of an 11 year war we don't have an article on. Fram (talk) 10:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (The Transnistria War was not a war like the one in for example Ukraine right now, with battles, large scale campaigns and offensives. Transnistria is a small sliver of land along a river with like seven towns. The Transnistria War was mostly clashing in the streets or in the bridges separating Transnistria and Moldova proper between civilians, policemen and informal militias of differing ideologies. There were no professional soldiers. There's actually not that much to write about and there were no proper battles.
The only exception was the battle of Tighina (1992) when Russian forces crossed the river I mentioned before and entered a Moldovan town with tanks and armored vehicles. Reliable sources recognize this difference, we have 20 results for "Battle of Tighina" or "Bender" (the town has two alternate names) [32] and 0 results for "Battle of Dubăsari" [33]. This article is WP:Original research and splitting this small war into the few towns it happened in is not productive. Take notice that the subsection #Cocieri-Dubăsari area occupies a third of Transnistria War#Military conflict.
Also worth mentioning are the article's contents. The infobox says one timeframe which is actually a small fraction of the article. Most of the article is either clashes between civilians/policemen rather than a proper military conflict or larger political events. Some of the covered clashes aren't even about the town of Dubăsari but about the province (Dubăsari District). There's also a lot of unsourced content. The article is quite a mess. With all this I propose the deletion of this article. SuperΨDro 18:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 4 d) (There may be something useful here, but right now we have a mess. The lead talks about NATO, but the title suggests more general topic, and what we have is a poorly referenced list of various A-Day to Z-Day as used in various contexts, from WWII, to NATO to US military. Right now this is an ORish mess of military trivia. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-07
General order (Top level military order to all subordinates)
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (This might be notable, but we have unreferenced stub, with a req for references since 2013. Unless someone can improve this, perhaps a redirect will suffice for now? To Operations order, perhaps? Or better, to Military order (instruction), which seems to be the parent topic? (Btw, if anyone cares for those topics both operations and the military order are very poor, barely referenced, and all fail to show WP:GNG, although common sense suggests that at least the general concept of a military order is notable, and I'd not be surprised to find out that general and operations have stand-alone notability as well - but until that is shown with sources, some redirecting may be in order (pun not intended), also given that 99% of the content is unreferenced and possibly WP:ORish in all of these articles :( ) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-08
Second Kuomintang-Communist Civil War (the second stage of the Chinese Civil War between the Kuomintang and the Chinese Communist Party for the leadership of China)
GoldWitness, the English and Chinese Wikipedias don't have to line up perfectly. Links between Chinese and English articles are meant to link the two articles with the most similar subject matter, not exact twins. This is a natural result of the fact that English and Chinese historians describe this period of history differently, and group the events differently.
If it's decided this article is necessary, GoldWitness please see these instructions on how to do it properly: WP:CORRECTSPLITSilverStar54 (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Fails GNG and NEVENT. Nothing found from WP:IS WP:RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Article is sourced mainly from a medieval chronicle. Other sources either fail WP:RS or are brief mentions. Nothing with SIGCOV. // Timothy :: talk 01:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (No refs on the page for many years. I'm not seeing a way to verify the information and it seems way beyond the point where there needs to be verified information from RS to keep the page JMWt (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-12
Organic unit (military unit organized within the ground warfare branch of a country's military)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Unreferenced stub, with a request for references since 2011. One broken footnote to a general search. My BEFORE suggests this is a generic term used in various fields, and I can't confirm that there is a specific use of this in military. Our article fails WP:OR, WP:GNG and WP:V. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
Dressing down (Wikipedia article covering multiple topics)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article consists of the two meanings of the phrase. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails GNG and NBIO. Sources in article are OBITs with all the normal problems. BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth. // Timothy :: talk 01:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Once again, I'd like to propose the deletion of this article. Initially, my awareness of this unit arose from its presence on Wikipedia, prompting me to contribute and expand it beyond its initial stub status. However, I encountered significant challenges due to the scarcity of available sources. A search yielded only around 9-10 books, all of which contained very similar information, suggesting a common source, likely the oldest among them. Furthermore, the information from these books has already been incorporated into the article, resulting in a mere three-sentence paragraph.
Moreover, my efforts to find reliable Indonesian-language sources proved unfruitful, despite the unit's affiliation with the Indonesian military. I expected to find references to it within documents from the Indonesian National Armed Forces or Indonesian Navy, or possibly in the archives of the National Archives of Indonesia if it held historical significance. However, my inquiries only led to wiki-like websites and forums, all drawing from the same pool of information found in the books.
While the term "gurita" (octopus) is commonly used within Indonesian navy contexts, associations with units such as the 5th Marine Infantry Battalion, which bears the nickname "Gurita Cakti," and naval special force task force known as Satgas Gurita, a military training codename for operations like hostage rescue, counterterrorism, and securing critical facilities (see 1 for reference), both appear unrelated to the unit in question.
Consequently, I am inclined to believe that this unit may be fictitious, with the information provided in the books possibly stemming from a misunderstanding or error. It's important to acknowledge that even reliable sources are not infallible. Ckfasdf (talk) 13:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Does not appear to be a notable concept, unable to find WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV. PROD was rejected because a magazine article exists, but that is a primary source written by the person who created this hypothetical round. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 17:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Article has had zero secondary sources since creation. Struggling to find significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Fails WP:NORG. AusLondonder (talk) 12:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (8 k, 5 d) (The originator of this article has been blocked for sockpuppetry, and the content from previous socks has been shown to be biased, lacking in neutrality as they admit in their unblock request that they were here with a political agenda of exposing something instead of building encyclopedia. These subjects are already addressed in articles on Military coups in Pakistan, and each election article discusses allegations of rigging such as here. Several other editors have also expressed concerns, such as content failing verification. With such a vast article, it's impractical for anyone to meticulously review every piece of content against numerous sources. Therefore, it would be wise to delete it, saving volunteers countless hours. WP:TNT might apply here. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 16:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (This article has been limping along for years as a perma-stub, and in that time only one citation to a reliable source that is independent from the subject has been found: Kinna 2012, p. 357 (this source provides only a single sentence of information about it, in a long list of other organisations). Looking through Google Scholar,[34] I haven't been able to find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Most of the sources found are from members of the organisation (i.e. Tom Wetzel), or authors connected directly to the organisation (i.e. Workers' Solidarity Movement) or are false positives (i.e. Emma Goldman). Others only provide passing mentions to the WSA, in longer lists of other organisations (i.e. Gustavo Rodriguez, Robert Hlatky).
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No evidence of notability found, sources in article are primary, other sources are routine or passing. Article is one of a group of quid-pro-quo promo pieces between the Field Naturalist Clubs in Victoria, Australia and Wikimedia Australia, created by one and moved back out of draft (against the COI/PAID guidelines) by a paid member of the other. Fram (talk) 12:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Previous AfD was no consensus. However, some suggested merging/moving to Clive and Vera Ramaciotti Foundation but that now redirects here. I still believes he fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG on every level. Most of the citations fail verification. Prod was contested with reasoning that significant coverage exists in books, good faith search found that is not the case. Spagooder (talk) 05:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Article about a municipal political party represented on a single suburban city council, not properly sourced as passing WP:ORGDEPTH. As always, political parties are not "inherently" notable just because they exist -- notability hinges on media coverage about their activities, not just on verifying their existence. But this is referenced almost entirely to content self-published by the city council itself, which isn't support for notability at all -- and even the one hit that actually comes from a WP:GNG-worthy media outlet isn't about this party at all, but is here solely to verify a tangential fact about somebody else from a different party. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to have much, much better referencing than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Unrepresented minor party which received less than 1% of the vote in elections. Clearly fails WP:ORGCRIT as lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." AusLondonder (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (Party contested one election and received 40 (!) votes, or 0.03%. Needless to say, it does not meet WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 15:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (Doesn't add anything that isn't at 2024 Libertarian Party presidential primaries#Results already. Only sourcing is an overview of all North Carolina elections, a FOX News local station, a Facebook post, and two X (Twitter) posts. A search doesn't yield anything significant for the Libertarian primary for North Carolina. reppoptalk 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I didn't find sufficient sources through a WP:BEFORE which went into significant detail to pass WP:GNG. While he was the lead in Worst Year of My Life Again I don't think he passes WP:NACTOR as he hasn't had multiple significant roles. A possible redirect could be to Worst Year of My Life Again. Suonii180 (talk) 01:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (There is a lack of substantial coverage in reliable third-party sources that discuss the subject in depth. The current cited sources include passing mentions, a contributor piece, and an announcement of her inclusion in the 100 Women of Influence 2016 list, which does not automatically confer notability. Although a Google news search yielded some sources, they primarily consist of passing mentions or self-published materials, none of which establish independent notability. GSS💬 16:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 3 d) (An orphan article. Fails WP:CORP. A search in google news yielded little. LibStar (talk) 02:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
Sophie Kovic (Entrepreneur and social media personality)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:GNG, and Seed & Sprout fails WP:NCORP. Non-notable awards and local interviews are the only coverage. ~ A412talk! 17:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (It's a person who became a teacher then a headteacher. I see that there is an entry in an Australian biographical dictionary but I'm not really seeing what the claim to notability is in terms of the en.wiki inclusion criteria. JMWt (talk) 10:04, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article doesn't have any citations, only a few "sources" listed. The winner of the election isn't even notable enough for a page, why then is the election? The city itself is a suburb of Yokohama and has a population of about 58,087, this would be fine, but the article gives me no reason to believe the elections of Zushi are actually notable. The article does not appear to be included on the Japanese Language Wikipedia either. Delete. Samoht27 (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 0 d) (It's a person who became a teacher then a headteacher. I see that there is an entry in an Australian biographical dictionary but I'm not really seeing what the claim to notability is in terms of the en.wiki inclusion criteria. JMWt (talk) 10:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (All the sources given are primary sources from the subject's organisation, except for a mention in a local newspaper I am unable to verify. Gerstenberger's opinion is also cited in this CBC article as one of a plethora of Hamilton residents' comments on steel production. However, in my opinion neither of these secondary sources are notable mentions, and Gerstenberger's role as president of a local union and minor communist party do not seem to be notable enough on their own. Yue🌙 04:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This was nominated for deletion last month however this was kept, not sure why.. maybe because the nom was sock? anyways, this one is clearly promotional BLP about a non-notable advocate. as mentioned in the previous nom, there is no reference that is directly about him. Fails WP:GNG. Saqib (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
ShakesQueer (3rd episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
Conjoined Queens (8th episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
Prancing Queens (10th episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-06
The DESPY Awards (5th episode of the 7th season of RuPaul's Drag Race)
AfD (7 k, 1 d) (Insufficient grounds for a standalone article; I attempted to redirect this article, but was reverted. Recommend forced redirect or deletion. Bgsu98(Talk) 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
Peter Nguyen Van Hung (Vietnamese Australian Catholic priest and human rights activist (born 1958))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Possible cross-wiki spam, noticed some 15 years ago already. I don't see notability; he is an activist but without major achievements. Nadzik (talk) 10:15, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article has been tagged with unresolved referencing issues for 11 years. I think it's now time to evaluate it for deletion.
The article currently has one reference. I've scanned Google News, Google Books, JSTOR, and newspapers.com and can only find one additional reference in WP:RS, here [35] where it's mentioned in one sentence as the organizer of a conference.
It notes some WP:N "advisors," however, gives no source to WP:V if they really are "advisors" and that probably doesn't matter anyway due to WP:NOTINHERITED.
It's fashionable nowadays to start "think tanks" that are basically blogs or white paper publishing platforms and this appears to be one of those. (Insofar as it's something like that, it seems to be fine and might even be WP:RS, but that's separate from question of its N.) Its Form 990 [36] indicates it has a single employee who appears to be a grad student at Stony Brook University. Chetsford (talk) 02:40, 17 March 2024 (UTC); edited 06:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (I am also nominating the following related pages because the reason I mentioned below:
Nominated this one of the many low quality article (from the article creator) since I have no choice to, considering this has been reverted twice without the reverter explaining why.
I've first proposed to merge this to Volkswagen-Audi V8 engine as they are the same as the production engines. Well, the numbers suggest that they are, not as 'prototype' as the article creator claimed. Since it sat unaddressed, I made the decision to merge, this got reverted because I forgot to add the editing summary. I redid this, which again got reverted. These articles are nothing but written stats without asserting notability. SpacedFarmer (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This is a duplicate of the Ford Levacar Mach 1 article. This is the older article, but it is inaccurately named and features less citations and information. I propose that this article be deleted, and any relevant information (as well as any links on other pages to this article) be migrated to the other article. Alternatively, this article can be made into a redirect to the other article. TKOIII (talk) 18:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 13 d) (Non-notable and minor incident, fails WP:NOTNEWS, WP:GNG , WP:LASTING and while an essay, does fail WP:AIRCRASH. The incident doesn't have major consequences and coverage stopped 5 days ago with barely any major news websites talking about the incident. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 5 d) (WP:NOTNEWS, fails WP:GNG , WP:LASTING and while an essay, does fail WP:AIRCRASH. The only articles talking about the incident are aviation websites with basically no mainstream news sites talking about the incident. I seriously have doubts whether this incident will result in any changes as it happened over Somaliland. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Does not appear to meet WP:GNG - while there are plenty of sources about the line, none seem to discuss this station in any detail. A redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro) seems best. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Does not appear to meet WP:GNG - while there are plenty of sources about the line, none seem to discuss this station in any detail. A redirect to Line 5 (Wuhan Metro) seems best. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article has deviated from its original purpose and is a good example of how Wikipedia's live documentation of history can go haywire sometimes. Originally, back in 2013, this is a place SpaceX Mars vehicle proposal named "Mars Colonial Transporter" ([37]). After that, there are multiple iterations of this concept which is best described at SpaceX Starship design history. Later on, around 2020 ([38]), this article list all SpaceX mars mission proposals and vehicles to go along with it. But by 2024, I've rewritten this article to try to emphasize about the relationship between SpaceX and Mars, because the launch vehicles have already being written about at SpaceX Starship and SpaceX Red Dragon, but I stopped doing so when I realized that this article will be filled with original research and press releases information. I think this article should be redirected or at the very least refactored in some way. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (5 k, 4 d) (Associate prof, some early career awards, decent number of citations but perhaps not especially high. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NPROF. Might be WP:TOOSOON or WP:MILL. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Zero secondary sources. Does not meet WP:NORG, lacking 'significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" AusLondonder (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (Not a G4, however with only one independent source and the concerns from the prior AfD, I'm still not sure it's notable. StarMississippi 12:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 4 d) (There may be something useful here, but right now we have a mess. The lead talks about NATO, but the title suggests more general topic, and what we have is a poorly referenced list of various A-Day to Z-Day as used in various contexts, from WWII, to NATO to US military. Right now this is an ORish mess of military trivia. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:46, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 6 d) (Only routine and promotional coverage in low quality sources Thebiguglyalien (talk) 05:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-03
Henrybuilt (American design and manufacturing company)
AfD (3 k, 0 d) (Realtively small company making kitchens and furniture with no particularly notable features. No obvious ways of linking to other Wikipedia pages Newhaven lad (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Inferior duplicate of a more complete template already transcludef at River Lea. No need for a standalone list. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 13:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Too small a snippet of history to be notable enough to have its own article - no objection if someone merges it if they know a suitable article to merge into Chidgk1 (talk) 07:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (No evidence of notability found, sources in article are primary, other sources are routine or passing. Article is one of a group of quid-pro-quo promo pieces between the Field Naturalist Clubs in Victoria, Australia and Wikimedia Australia, created by one and moved back out of draft (against the COI/PAID guidelines) by a paid member of the other. Fram (talk) 12:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (Military manual. Nothing in the article suggests it is notable. Effectively unreferenced outside a popculture trivia note. As such, this fails not just WP:GNG but also WP:OR. My BEFORE shows next to nothing, at least under the current name. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (Like his father, Alfred Cowles Jr., good sourcing is lacking. Reads like a genealogical entry. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (I have conducted WP:BEFORE search and I am not finding independent coverage beyond La Crosse Tribune local paper, and repeated mentions of "La Crosse Technology's Atomic Digital Alarm Clock with a retail value of $29.95!" in Popular Science magazine. Graywalls (talk) 08:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (There is a Turkish company called Atlas Energy (Atlas Enerji in Turkish) but this one does not seem to have enough sources to be notable Chidgk1 (talk) 13:39, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (Like many 'in fiction' and like topics, there is a chance this is a notable topic (a good one, given sources like [39]). Unfortunately, our current execution is simply terrible. Just three footnotes. A WP:OR prose opening with no source, followed by a gigantic list of random works that mention this topic that fails WP:IPC/MOS:TRIVIA. This needs to be rewritten from scratch, as nothing here is rescuable, or in other words, this merits a WP:TNT treatment, although a WP:ATD-R alternative is to redirect this to Tachyon#In_fiction, from which it was spun long time ago. The short section there is at least referenced, if poorly - but still better than what we have here. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 4 d) (WP:NOTNEWS, all sources are from September 2007, no long term significance. Also primarily created by Sengkang, so WP:PDEL might apply. Darylgolden(talk)Ping when replying 09:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-12
Maritime Page (Website dedicated to maritime industry information and insights)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not yet notable per WP:WEB. It is used as a source in the RUSI and Bellingcat pages cited, but not actually mentioned. In a WP:BEFORE search I could only find passing mentions of the site in three BusinessWorld articles , citing it for the number of shipyards in the Philippines in 2021: [40][41][42]. Wikishovel (talk) 09:45, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 1 d) (Not a valid disambiguation page: only one even partial match, plus a bunch of related articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Sources used are all primary: either interviews quoting him, his profiles on university websites, or even his research articles. His personal website lists multiple media appearances, but they are all either interviews or articles by his university, so no independent secondary sources here. The best sources could be this one which repeatedly quotes Mies on his research and even has a paragraph quoting a researcher critical of Mies' work, and this one which discusses his team's research in detail and briefly quotes him. However, neither seems to rise to the level of a full secondary source significantly covering him.
AfD (0 k, 6 d) (Rather elementary page that appears to be a snippet from a text on C++ programming. Too trivial to merit an article, definitely not notable by itself. (Matrices & tensors are covered elsewhere.) Ldm1954 (talk) 09:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 5 d) (Completely fails WP:NOTTEXTBOOK, appears to be a tutorial/course rather than an encyclopedic article. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 18:42, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (WP:NOTDIRECTORY. The article is titled as if it is about a topic. It's just a list of members without any real context as to why the members are notable or what the purpose of the society is. Shadow311 (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not seeing indicia of encyclopedic notability. Subject seems to be a fairly run-of-the-mill computer scientist who had a leading position in some non-notable conferences. Since its creation in 2007, the article has never had any independent citations. BD2412T 17:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-14
OpenSym (Conference dedicated to wiki and open collaboration research)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Previous AfD closed as no consensus due to zero participation. That does not change the fact that this is still almost entirely primary sourced navel gazing, and tagged as such since 2015 without improvement [with] no real evidence of notability* Pppery *it has begun... 23:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Non-notable, closed distillery with no WP:RS on page, none that I could find, and none are likely to exist. Cabrils (talk) 21:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Seems like a single event with limited ongoing impact so looks like it might not meet WP:LASTING. The refs appear to be WP:ROUTINE and more than 90% of the page is not sourced and therefore per WP:V could be removed. JMWt (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Unreferenced essay/WP:OR, which is extra problematic as this topic is related to medical areas, where we want above-average quality. No footnotes, two not very reliably looking external links, tagged as needing more sources since 2012. If nobody can improve this, WP:ATD-R target to consider could be Food preservation perhaps? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Effectively unreferenced... major mess. The article's lead suggests it is about a company (which does not seem notable, no hits on GScholar). Much of the body seems to discuss some of their product or products ("Bender Washer/Releaser"). Then there is a big EL farm to their patents. At best I can say this is some historical WP:OR and sadly I doubt anything here can be rescued (GScholar returns zero hits for this "Bender Washer/Releaser"). At worst, this looks like a possible WP:HOAX, although AFD I lean towards ye old OR. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (There is no claim to notability. The present sources show that the subject has not met WP:GNG. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 03:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:GNG. Google returns plenty results, but most are connected sources or routine coverage. I didn't find anything independent, secondary and in-depth.
The stub has been around since 2008, created by a single-purpose COI editor, with no content other than defining what the software is. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:07, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Not enough coverage for notability. There is a brief description in a book titled Effective Digital Learning Environments [47], as part of a list of random educational websites, and other than that I could only find very brief mentions, mostly in the context of Alan Alda. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 03:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails general notability and breed notability, article is of poor quality all of the sources that could be used to establish notability such as the news articles don't even mention the breed. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:50, 20 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Not recognised by ARBA or BRC, no reliable source talks about it from my search. Might have more information available in Swedish under the name Sverigehare. Not to be confused with Lepus timidus which is referred to as the Swedish hare in some sources. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:27, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 4 d) (This is not an ambiguous topic, and this page is not at all formatted as a disambiguation page. It is, rather, merely a list of instances of conduct that could be characterized as mutilation of the genitals. BD2412T 19:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Most of this article is just a massive list that has been copied directly from legislation. That is not what an encyclopedia is for. The rest of it (which is just the introduction) can be merged to Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. That article already has a link to the legislation, if the readers want to see the whole list; that article should just summarise the list, not reproduce it in its entirety. Richard75 (talk) 21:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (Fails WP:SUSTAINED. The only two reliable, independent citations are from right when the website was created, and they reek of churnalism. Might be worth a mention on Web Standards Project but doesn't seem to deserve its own page. Apocheir (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Can't find any reliable sources or significant coverage for this piece of software. Doesn't seem to pass WP:NSOFT. Has been marked as not notable since 2010. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 20:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Minor software project whose development appears to have ended around 2009, with the project still in a "pre-alpha" stage, and whose parent project (the Parrot virtual machine) was itself pining for the fjords officially discontinued in 2017. No third-party references in the article, and I wasn't able to find any online either. Omphalographer (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-03
CurveBall (Web browser security vulnerability on Microsoft Windows 10)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Per WP:NOTNEWS, the last coverage of this particular security exploit was in 2020 and it has effectively been forgotten since. As it currently stands I do not think it is notable enough for a standalone entry. Sohom (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-04
Oniro OS (Family of open-source operating systems based on OpenHarmony)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (There are no sources that would establish notability, and a quick Google search doesn't reveal anything else that could establish notability either. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (All of the references are primary sources. I also can't find any secondary sources that are reliable enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (There are no citations in this article, and I can't find anything on the internet about this language besides papers from the authors. Those papers have a combined total of less than 100 citations. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any sources about GuideML that would establish its notability. The repo itself hasn't been updated in years, and I can't find any evidence that it's being heavily used. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 0 d) (I could not find significant coverage of him to meet WP:BIO. Also does not meet WP:PROF, google scholar comes up with a namesake who is an expert in sexual health. LibStar (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article also fails to meet Wikipedia criteria for both WP:SIGCOV and WP:NSOFT. The three sources provided in the article are solely from the official website of the software. I was unable to locate credible sources that provide comprehensive and in-depth coverage of the topic, which are necessary for a standalone article. Barseghian Lilia (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (Appears to be a non-notable individual due to the lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Current sources primarily comprise passing mentions or interviews, which is also consistent with WP:BEFORE. Despite occasional appearances as a guest on TV shows, this alone does not establish notability. Additionally, the author appears to have a COI/UPE, considering their edit history. GSS💬 16:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any sources that would establish notablity. I'm not sure about the notability of Sleepycat Software, which is the company that created the license, but I've found very little about the license itself, and notability isn't inherited from the company that created it. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Propel (PHP) (free object–relational mapping toolkit written in PHP)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article was PRODed four years ago because it didn't meet notability standards. A user (who is now indefinitely banned) reversed the PROD. The edit history nor the talk page actually gives a reason for the PROD. I still don't think this article meets notability guidelines, and I can't find any sources that would make it meet these guidelines. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (While there are some references, they are pretty poor - manuals and passing mentions, and the article's style is not very encyclopedic - this reads more like a how-to guide (obsolete at that). This topic has a very dubious notability. Perhaps some redirect/merger with Booting process of Windows NT might help both but... the connection here is not clear (redirect?). PS. Last year there was an AfD for this where there were promises of improvement and that WP:THEREMAYBESOURCES. Nothing has improved since, and the cited sources are how-to manuals - those are very poor indicators of notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (A PROD on this article was removed because "Swaret was used" at some point in the past. The justification, based on the edit history, is that a singular user on a public forum said that they used the package some unknown amount of time ago. I'm sending this to AfD because this added source does not establish notability. It's not reliable, does not provide extensive coverage, and it isn't clear whether the source is necessarily secondary. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP: N. I can't find any additional sources that would establish notability. Of the four sources on the page, two don't mention the library by name, and the other two are from Microsoft. This apparently had a PROD within an hour of the article's creation in 2013 which is kind of silly, but I'm sending this to AfD just to be safe. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Per previous PROD: Exists, but doesn't meet WP:N. - UtherSRG(talk) 18:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
GNOME Panel (Taskbar implementation for the GNOME desktop environment)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (GNOME Panel lacks independent, verifiable sources establishing its notability. As such, it may be appropriate to consider merging the information into the GNOME or deletion. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 17:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This doesn’t meet WP: N. I can’t find any reliable secondary sources that actually compare different IDEs for programming in Haxe. HyperAccelerated (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Nominating on behalf of 86.23.109.101 (talk). Their rationale is as follows:
There doesn't seem to be a single source in the article that demonstrates third party coverage of this software. Citations 1, 2 and 3 are links to the software's own website. Citation 4 is an announcement that the authors of the software will be presenting it at a conference. Citations 5, 7, 10 and 11 are papers written by the authors of Sweble. Citation 6 is a dead link to what seems to have been an open source community page? Citations 8 and 9 are pages on the mediawiki wiki, unusable as sources.
A few google searches failed to turn up anything usable, mostly software repositories and the papers written by the software's authors. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))) Liu1126 (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (While this may be notable (there are some passing references in my GScholar BEFORE), what we have is pure WP:OR - content tagged as unreferenced for over a decade, with no interwikis. It is pretty much orphaned (just two mainspace articles link here) and outside the lead is underlnked This is outside my field of expertise, so I cannot even comment whether what is written about here is related to the uses I see in GScholar. If someone improves this, great, otherwise, a redirect somewhere could be considered as well. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Doesn't meet WP:CORP, though it's WP:LISTED. A WP:BEFORE search turned up only press releases, obvious sponsored content like this in WP:NEWSORGINDIA and on computing news websites, and passing mentions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:N. None of the sources in the article establish notability, and I couldn’t find any sources that would establish notability. This had a failed PROD in 2009 because two sources were added at that time. However, those sources are either primary or don’t cover the subject in depth. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Promotional article of a non-notable certification program. Largely unsourced and does not seem to warrant a standalone article. CycloneYoristalk! 09:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (I am also nominating the following related pages because the reason I mentioned below:
Nominated this one of the many low quality article (from the article creator) since I have no choice to, considering this has been reverted twice without the reverter explaining why.
I've first proposed to merge this to Volkswagen-Audi V8 engine as they are the same as the production engines. Well, the numbers suggest that they are, not as 'prototype' as the article creator claimed. Since it sat unaddressed, I made the decision to merge, this got reverted because I forgot to add the editing summary. I redid this, which again got reverted. These articles are nothing but written stats without asserting notability. SpacedFarmer (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This is a duplicate of the Ford Levacar Mach 1 article. This is the older article, but it is inaccurately named and features less citations and information. I propose that this article be deleted, and any relevant information (as well as any links on other pages to this article) be migrated to the other article. Alternatively, this article can be made into a redirect to the other article. TKOIII (talk) 18:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 13 d) (Non-notable and minor incident, fails WP:NOTNEWS, WP:GNG , WP:LASTING and while an essay, does fail WP:AIRCRASH. The incident doesn't have major consequences and coverage stopped 5 days ago with barely any major news websites talking about the incident. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 5 d) (WP:NOTNEWS, fails WP:GNG , WP:LASTING and while an essay, does fail WP:AIRCRASH. The only articles talking about the incident are aviation websites with basically no mainstream news sites talking about the incident. I seriously have doubts whether this incident will result in any changes as it happened over Somaliland. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Just because it's a wiki project doesn't mean it's notable. All the sources that I reviewed are primary sources, data table of activity, passing mentions. The only article that seems to talk in any material way about wikibooks does so from a Wikipedia centric view and how it's complementary [48] I don't feel like this article will survive a 3 reliable reference rule audit. Greatder (talk) 01:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (No evidence that this concept is notable. The hits for "power of a method" I found are invariably about power of a test, or something else unrelated to this. Only source is an WP:SPS published by retired businessman Norman W. Edmund, and does not support the article at all. Paradoctor (talk) 17:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 2 d) (No good sources in 15+ years, I couldn't find anything greater than blog quality asa skurce when I checked Big Money Threepwood (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Most of this article is just a massive list that has been copied directly from legislation. That is not what an encyclopedia is for. The rest of it (which is just the introduction) can be merged to Misuse of Drugs Act 1971. That article already has a link to the legislation, if the readers want to see the whole list; that article should just summarise the list, not reproduce it in its entirety. Richard75 (talk) 21:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Contested draft, so we're here. No evidence of N:ORG level coverage for this private medical school nor its journal. Explicitly do not recommend Drafting since creator has history of moving articles back StarMississippi 17:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Poorly focussed page where the lede is talking about British hospitals but other countries are shoehorned in later. It's a collection of international anecdotes which are cobbled together for a particular narrative (ie hospital food is bad in the UK and elsewhere) WP:SYNTH. There might be some other way to write a page on this topic, but this needs WP:TNTJMWt (talk) 10:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Article created and continues to be edited by COI editor who removed PROD tag on the basis that "We are in the process of editing this page, but we need the copy to be authorised, which can not be done in the timescale that you have provided, it will be carried out soon,".
The organisation lacks "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject", as a result failing WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 18:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (4 k, 0 d) (Academic with an h-factor of 16, no major awards and a low publication rate. Article survived a PROD in 2017, but was not discussed further. Minor mentions in scientific info journals/blogs, but I do not see this as meeting WP:NPROF now or before. (He seems to be a serious scientist, but not notable.) Ldm1954 (talk) 20:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 7 d) (Hypothecial (fictional) concept that seems to fail WP:GNG. BEFORE shows next to no hits on GScholar, what we have is pure WP:OR (unreferenced) mixing speculations about real science with fiction. Sole reference (not footnoted) is a book on UFOlogy and sole EL is to the Star Trek wiki. I have no suggestion for a plausible redirect this time - this is so bad I fear it needs to be blown up with a vengeance. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:23, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-18
Inertia damper (device that counters the effects of inertia and other forces and motion)
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (A very similar case to the about-to-be-deleted mess that is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inertia negation. Mostly unreferenced OR, half of which is an unsourced list of "Real-world applications and devices". The only two footnotes are for the red-linked concept of a rotary damper (perhaps it is notable and should be split and stubbed?). I'll note that the concept of "Inertia damper" does have a few hundred hits on GScholar, so there may be a real science concept to be written about here, but what we have begs for WP:TNT, IMHO. Pinging participants of the aforementioned AfD: User:Lubal, User:Xxanthippe, User:Zxcvbnm, User:Shooterwalker, User:Johnjbarton, User:Rorshacma and User:DrowssapSMM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article has deviated from its original purpose and is a good example of how Wikipedia's live documentation of history can go haywire sometimes. Originally, back in 2013, this is a place SpaceX Mars vehicle proposal named "Mars Colonial Transporter" ([49]). After that, there are multiple iterations of this concept which is best described at SpaceX Starship design history. Later on, around 2020 ([50]), this article list all SpaceX mars mission proposals and vehicles to go along with it. But by 2024, I've rewritten this article to try to emphasize about the relationship between SpaceX and Mars, because the launch vehicles have already being written about at SpaceX Starship and SpaceX Red Dragon, but I stopped doing so when I realized that this article will be filled with original research and press releases information. I think this article should be redirected or at the very least refactored in some way. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 2 d) (Fails WP:SUSTAINED. The only two reliable, independent citations are from right when the website was created, and they reek of churnalism. Might be worth a mention on Web Standards Project but doesn't seem to deserve its own page. Apocheir (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP, all citations to otherwise reliable sources read more like press releases or advertising than actual reporting. AlexandraAVX (talk) 17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Can't find any reliable sources or significant coverage for this piece of software. Doesn't seem to pass WP:NSOFT. Has been marked as not notable since 2010. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 20:43, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Minor software project whose development appears to have ended around 2009, with the project still in a "pre-alpha" stage, and whose parent project (the Parrot virtual machine) was itself pining for the fjords officially discontinued in 2017. No third-party references in the article, and I wasn't able to find any online either. Omphalographer (talk) 19:10, 28 February 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-03
CurveBall (Web browser security vulnerability on Microsoft Windows 10)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Per WP:NOTNEWS, the last coverage of this particular security exploit was in 2020 and it has effectively been forgotten since. As it currently stands I do not think it is notable enough for a standalone entry. Sohom (talk) 03:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-04
Oniro OS (Family of open-source operating systems based on OpenHarmony)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any reliable secondary sources, both within and outside of the article, that would establish notability. Most of the secondary sources I could find are by people with unknown credentials. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (All of the references are primary sources. I also can't find any secondary sources that are reliable enough to establish notability. HyperAccelerated (talk) 01:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article also fails to meet Wikipedia criteria for both WP:SIGCOV and WP:NSOFT. The three sources provided in the article are solely from the official website of the software. I was unable to locate credible sources that provide comprehensive and in-depth coverage of the topic, which are necessary for a standalone article. Barseghian Lilia (talk) 19:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I can't find any sources that would establish notablity. I'm not sure about the notability of Sleepycat Software, which is the company that created the license, but I've found very little about the license itself, and notability isn't inherited from the company that created it. HyperAccelerated (talk) 02:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP: N. The Quigley source in the existing article isn't reliable, nor are any other sources I could find online. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-09
Nulloy (Open source audio player with seekbar as waveform)
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (I can't find any coverage from a reliable source about this software, so I think it fails WP: N. HyperAccelerated (talk) 18:38, 9 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (3 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NOPAGE in my view, and should be redirected to the entry at List of Generation Z slang. Seemingly all reliable sources documenting this word do so in the context of providing brief explanations of what the word is (presumably for an audience of confused parents of Gen Alpha children), and lack substantial cultural or etymological analysis, making expansion prospects for the article dim. Mach61 04:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-11
Propel (PHP) (free object–relational mapping toolkit written in PHP)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article was PRODed four years ago because it didn't meet notability standards. A user (who is now indefinitely banned) reversed the PROD. The edit history nor the talk page actually gives a reason for the PROD. I still don't think this article meets notability guidelines, and I can't find any sources that would make it meet these guidelines. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (While there are some references, they are pretty poor - manuals and passing mentions, and the article's style is not very encyclopedic - this reads more like a how-to guide (obsolete at that). This topic has a very dubious notability. Perhaps some redirect/merger with Booting process of Windows NT might help both but... the connection here is not clear (redirect?). PS. Last year there was an AfD for this where there were promises of improvement and that WP:THEREMAYBESOURCES. Nothing has improved since, and the cited sources are how-to manuals - those are very poor indicators of notability. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (A PROD on this article was removed because "Swaret was used" at some point in the past. The justification, based on the edit history, is that a singular user on a public forum said that they used the package some unknown amount of time ago. I'm sending this to AfD because this added source does not establish notability. It's not reliable, does not provide extensive coverage, and it isn't clear whether the source is necessarily secondary. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP: N. I can't find any additional sources that would establish notability. Of the four sources on the page, two don't mention the library by name, and the other two are from Microsoft. This apparently had a PROD within an hour of the article's creation in 2013 which is kind of silly, but I'm sending this to AfD just to be safe. HyperAccelerated (talk) 03:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Sourcing currently in the article is one forum (MSE) thread, two blog-posts, one youtube video from a math popularizer, and one page that is hosted on a university website but is of unclear authorship, which describes this notation as "so young that one could conceive of it as still gestating in the womb and "new and as-yet-unaccepted by the general mathematics community". Google Scholar finds no hits for the topic (searching for both the title of the article and "'triangle notation' logarithm"). The PROD rationale "Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage found." certainly describes this sourcing; it was reverted by Kvng, while adding one of the two blog posts, which doesn't suggest the presence of sources of appropriate quality. Maybe some day someone will write some RS about this subject. JBL (talk) 21:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (7 k, 3 d) (Non-notable (fails WP:GNG) and promotional. There are sources, but they are not reliable. Moreover, stricter scrutininy should be given to them per WP:NCORP and WP:ORGIND. Local Variable (talk) 17:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Per previous PROD: Exists, but doesn't meet WP:N. - UtherSRG(talk) 18:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
2024-03-13
GNOME Panel (Taskbar implementation for the GNOME desktop environment)
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (GNOME Panel lacks independent, verifiable sources establishing its notability. As such, it may be appropriate to consider merging the information into the GNOME or deletion. ― ☪ Kapudan Pasha (🧾 - 💬) 17:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (2 k, 0 d) (Just because it's a wiki project doesn't mean it's notable. All the sources that I reviewed are primary sources, data table of activity, passing mentions. The only article that seems to talk in any material way about wikibooks does so from a Wikipedia centric view and how it's complementary [51] I don't feel like this article will survive a 3 reliable reference rule audit. Greatder (talk) 01:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Fails WP:NCORP, coverage is of "top startups" variety and reprints partnership announcements. The best coverage is of the Times Square billboard incident, but it's really not about the company, it's an action by its co-founder, and notability is not inherited. ~ A412talk! 17:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This "social enterprise" does not seem to have enough significant coverage or reliable sources to meet WP:NORG. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 02:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (One of the worst articles I've ever come across, previous AfD was a farce. Zero secondary sources. No evidence of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources per WP:ORGCRIT. AusLondonder (talk) 16:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Coverage is routine and lacking significant independent reporting (mostly interviews). It does not meet WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 22:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (This doesn’t meet WP: N. I can’t find any reliable secondary sources that actually compare different IDEs for programming in Haxe. HyperAccelerated (talk) 04:24, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Does not appear to be a notable concept, unable to find WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV. PROD was rejected because a magazine article exists, but that is a primary source written by the person who created this hypothetical round. StreetcarEnjoyer(talk) 17:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Nominating on behalf of 86.23.109.101 (talk). Their rationale is as follows:
There doesn't seem to be a single source in the article that demonstrates third party coverage of this software. Citations 1, 2 and 3 are links to the software's own website. Citation 4 is an announcement that the authors of the software will be presenting it at a conference. Citations 5, 7, 10 and 11 are papers written by the authors of Sweble. Citation 6 is a dead link to what seems to have been an open source community page? Citations 8 and 9 are pages on the mediawiki wiki, unusable as sources.
A few google searches failed to turn up anything usable, mostly software repositories and the papers written by the software's authors. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC))) Liu1126 (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (While this may be notable (there are some passing references in my GScholar BEFORE), what we have is pure WP:OR - content tagged as unreferenced for over a decade, with no interwikis. It is pretty much orphaned (just two mainspace articles link here) and outside the lead is underlnked This is outside my field of expertise, so I cannot even comment whether what is written about here is related to the uses I see in GScholar. If someone improves this, great, otherwise, a redirect somewhere could be considered as well. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:32, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This article has deviated from its original purpose and is a good example of how Wikipedia's live documentation of history can go haywire sometimes. Originally, back in 2013, this is a place SpaceX Mars vehicle proposal named "Mars Colonial Transporter" ([52]). After that, there are multiple iterations of this concept which is best described at SpaceX Starship design history. Later on, around 2020 ([53]), this article list all SpaceX mars mission proposals and vehicles to go along with it. But by 2024, I've rewritten this article to try to emphasize about the relationship between SpaceX and Mars, because the launch vehicles have already being written about at SpaceX Starship and SpaceX Red Dragon, but I stopped doing so when I realized that this article will be filled with original research and press releases information. I think this article should be redirected or at the very least refactored in some way. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (1 k, 1 d) (Doesn't meet WP:CORP, though it's WP:LISTED. A WP:BEFORE search turned up only press releases, obvious sponsored content like this in WP:NEWSORGINDIA and on computing news websites, and passing mentions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Zero secondary sources. Does not meet WP:NORG, lacking "significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" AusLondonder (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC))
I don't think this restaurant is notable as it doesn't have "substantial coverage"- all there is are articles about how it is on the Michelin star list and how Wayne Gretzky ate there. The coverage is merely trivial. I don't think this restaurant is notable enough to be on Wikipedia. WizardGamer775 (talk) 18:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (8 k, 10 d) (Nominating this for deletion per norm. This current nomination has nothing to do with the tone of the article or its content or notability but per WP guidelines against blocked sock puppet accounts. Page creator is a confirmed sock puppet of TronFactor – the master of what looks like a well-oiled sock farm which has been blocked accordingly. Retaining this page will be a reward for unethical behavior and will encourage the sock farm to expand and create similar pages for whatever reasons they are creating them knowing that their accounts will only be blocked and the pages retained. In the last AFD, some of their socks participated and supported keep. When deleted, the article can be recreated by an ethical editor. Ludamane (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (The article does not go beyond a dictionary definition and Wikipedia is not a dictionary WP:NOTDICT. The article is poorly written and sourced. The concept of podiuming does not strike me as meeting criteria of notability. Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 22:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Sprawling list of broadcasters that is mostly unreferenced. Of the sources: most of the sources are news announcments about securing rights, four of those are primary sources. WP:NOTGUIDE applies here. The subjects are not described as a group, failing WP:LISTN. This article seems like excessive information that is not encyclopedic for Wikipedia. SpacedFarmer (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 1 d) (Fails WP:NCORP. Sources generally fail WP:ORGIND (interviews with the founders, reprints of office moving announcements, coverage of their own awards) or are trivial coverage (one-sentence CNN mention, startup rankings). ~ A412talk! 03:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Doesn't seem to meet WP:EVENTCRIT; as listed there [r]outine kinds of news events (including most crimes... – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable. All the references seem to merely report what happened in this awful thing, but there is no wider/long-term significance. Happy days, ~ LindsayHello 09:57, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Subject of article is a two-church denomination with no WP:SIGCOV in reliable, independent sources. All but one citation (which is trivial coverage) are to self-published material, the organization's own website, or other non-RS. Further research indicates that significant coverage does not exist and thus the subject fails the notability test. Dclemens1971 (talk) 20:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (Character is not notable enough for its own article. After a search of I could not find anything that would pass GNG. Grahaml35 (talk) 18:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (This has no secondary sources and reads like religious history homework more than a summary of a notable topic Big Money Threepwood (talk) 21:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 2 d) (Unreferenced messy stub, first part suggests it is a disambig, then it talks about another concept "student rank". Perhaps this can be converted into a proper disambig or redirected? Student rank is likely the same as Class rank; high school rank seems to be American-only ranking equivalent to College and university rankings but for high schools, which we do not have an article for. Although of course high school rankings exist outside US, so this is also badly in need of globalization. Can anyone fix it, or will we redirect this WP:TNT is also a consideration. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC))
AfD (0 k, 0 d) (I had redirected this to Yermolay Gamper in December last year, which was just undone. As of now, Gamper is the only Yermolay, Yermolai, Ermolai or Ermolay on English Wikipedia, so the name in its present state fails WP:NNAME, and I cannot find many, if any sources outside of dictionaries and baby name websites; the Russian language equivalent article seems to be sourced predominantly to dictionaries and there is only one source on this article that actually pertains to the name itself, which is also kind of a dictionary website, making it a WP:NOTDICT fail as well. Some of the other people listed might be notable, so I propose that the redirect be restored so that the page can be spun out if they ever receive articles, though it could also be redirected to Yermolayev, which explains the etymology. Sorry for the long read. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 18:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC))
