Hi IgnatiusofLondon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --Ymblanter (talk) 19:32, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
I just wanted to leave a note to let you know that, while your extensive contributions to the Trolleybuses in Rimini article are very welcome (and impressively good quality for someone who identifies as a new editor), and have – within this month – made the article far longer (and better overall) than any of the other 15 articles about individual trolleybus systems in Italy, you appear to have a lot more time to work on this than I do (perhaps you are retired; I am not), and I have a long list of other WP articles I want to edit. I won't be able to keep working on that article every day, or even every third day. But, as I said, your work on this has been very welcome, and impressive for someone who says he is not a transport enthusiast. FYI, until this past week, the best "Trolleybuses in [city]" WP articles for Italy were those on Bologna and Modena (BTW, I realize you have no interest in working on those; your interest is in Rimini subjects), but the Rimini one is now better than either of those! But for certain other cities, those articles are extremely brief (e.g. Ancona), and now that I and you have greatly expanded and improved the Rimini article I am more interested in spending my very limited WP editing time improving some of those rather than continuing to work on the Rimini one. But I am not saying I'm stopping altogether. – SJ Morg (talk) 08:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wimbledon Land Rover school crash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Hello, IgnatiusofLondon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fiabilandia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add ((NoACEMM))
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello, IgnatiusofLondon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Fiabilandia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the ((db-afc))
, ((db-draft))
, or ((db-g13))
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 14:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
I saw you add Carla Ronci to List of people declared venerable by Pope John Paul II, and what an excellent article! You should definitely nominate it for Did You Know. Always love to see more people working on saints! — Moriwen (talk) 15:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC) |
Hello! Your submission of Carla Ronci at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Oltrepier (talk) 17:36, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks very much for your excellent work on Amintore Galli! JJLiu112 (talk) 21:42, 6 January 2024 (UTC) |
Hi if you’re using the standard skin for Wikipedia the way you create ILLs is:
1. Go to the “tools” menu top right and hit “edit interlanguage links.” 2. This brings up a dialogue box asking you for the language you’re connecting to (e.g. “itwiki) and the name of the article you’re connecting to (e.g. “Inno dei lavoratori”). 3. That’s it. Mccapra (talk) 18:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Carla Ronci, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Carla Ronci, an Italian declared venerable by the Catholic Church, is remembered as the "Vespa saint"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Carla Ronci. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Carla Ronci), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 00:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pope Francis and LGBT topics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
You have persistently been one of the best editors of Fiducia Supplicans, and have helped me make better edits and have made incredibly helpful fixes to my unneeded or erroneous statements. Looking over your profile, you are doing a fantastic job overall.
From a lover of all things Wikipedia, I would like to express my sincerest thanks for all of your good work and commitment to quality and Wikipedia standards.
You have also managed to point out flaws in edits, both of my own and others in a constructive and charitable way.
Your great work has not gone unnoticed. I very rarely go out of my way to leave a topic like this on someone's page, or any topic at all on someone's profile for that matter, but because of your exceptional work and commitment I felt that it deserved recognition. Ysys9 (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi there can I ask why you are tagging a large number of articles about geographic places in San Marino with the use British English tag? I don't see how WP:TIES would apply here? AusLondonder (talk) 16:38, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
the English Wikipedia prefers no national variety over others. In my reading (and correct me if I'm wrong), MOS:TIES requires tied articles to use a specific variety, but is silent on articles that are not tied (which would include articles relating to San Marino).
When an English variety's consistent usage has been established in an article, maintain it in the absence of consensus to the contraryand
use the variety found in the first post-stub revision that introduced an identifiable variety. This is a policy I have almost certainly unknowingly violated on several articles on San Marino. That being said:
Hello, IgnatiusofLondon. You added a deletion sorting notice on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Forlivese dialect, but you did not add the discussion to the pages you mentioned. To add a deletion to a sorting page, you need to add ((Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ARTICLE TITLE)) to each sorting page. I have added the link to Italy, Language, and Literature. Happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 03:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi IgnatiusofLondon. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group for a trial period of three months. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. If you wish to retain the right after your three-month trial period has concluded, you may re-apply for this right permanently at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
I have reversed your "keep" closure at this discussion and relisted it. There was no consensus for a "keep" result at this discussion, as only one individual argued to keep and a later one asserted that there was nonetheless insufficient reference material available to justify an article. Please don't let this discourage you from helping out with closing AfDs, but do take care that there is in fact a consensus prior to doing so. Otherwise, relisting for more discussion may be the best call. Seraphimblade Talk to me 14:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raffaello Baldini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)