Archives

Archive 1 (May 2014–June 2015) Archive 2 (July–December 2015) Archive 3 (January–June 2016) Archive 4 (July–December 2016) Archive 5 (January–June 2017) Archive 6 (July–December 2017) Archive 7 (January–June 2018) Archive 8 (July–December 2018) Archive 9 (January–June 2019) Archive 10 (July–December 2019) Archive 11 (January–June 2020) Archive 12 (July–December 2020) Archive 13 (January–June 2021) Archive 14 (July–December 2021) Archive 15 (January–June 2022) Archive 16 (July–December 2022) Archive 17 (January–June 2023) Archive 18 (July–December 2023)

Just pointing out to you that your notification here isn't as helpful as you no doubt intended. By reviewing the history of the page, you would see that the editor who you notified created a redirect, not the article itself. That was created by Pedant six months later. While I know that Twinkle doesn't give you the flexibility to do the notifications any way other than how it is programmed, and I'm also aware that Pedant hasn't edited in over a year so is unlikely to respond (and further that another editor has added multiple references to mainstream media, so the tagging may not even be appropriate anymore), I'd like to encourage you to actually look at the history of the article before tagging it using Twinkle. If you still believe it should be prodded, you can still do so manually, while ensuring that the most appropriate editor is notified. It's uniquely irritating to receive a PROD notice for an article one didn't create and, in particular, didn't think was notable enough for an article of its own at the time of creating the redirect, as I am sure you would appreciate. Risker (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do check in from time to time but I mostly edit anonymously.User:Pedant (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has marked Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/GTBot as needing your input. Please visit that page to reply to the requests. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 03:06, 3 July 2016 (UTC) To opt out of these notifications, place ((bots|optout=operatorassistanceneeded)) anywhere on this page.[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect January 1901 (month). Since you had some involvement with the January 1901 (month) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 08:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the correction. In some versions of wikipedia i.e. the mobile version for one, the sentence concerning the Redirect from Bobby Cash(Singer) to Bobby Cash(singer lower case),still appears along with the article. Can it be rectified? And could you please address the matter. Thank you.(Catulet (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Your account has been granted the "templateeditor" user permission, allowing you to edit templates and modules that have been protected with template protection. It also allows you to bypass the title blacklist, giving you the ability to create and edit editnotices. Before you use this user right, please read Wikipedia:Template editor and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on wise template editing and the criteria for revocation.

You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, after those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their consensus among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process edit requests on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.

This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

Useful links

• All template-protected pages
• User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
• Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection

Happy template editing! Nakon 02:19, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

These templates used to display the latese stable or preview version number and date, and provide an edit link. Their edit links currently only works with desktop editor even if you are using a mobile phone. I have a solution to making the edit link works proper with both desktop and mobile browsers, since these templates are fully protected, I hope you to make this optimize, open their sandbox page you can get the solution. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 14:37, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can go to their test cases to see the effect. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 14:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please advise where I can find my article content. This is my first article and I find this all very confusing. SeptimusDaisy (talk) 09:31, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GeoffreyT2000. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Biblio (talk) WikiProject Reforming Wikipedia. 01:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GeoffreyT2000, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:38, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

I wonder what might be the reason for moving the article back to the MikhaYlovsky, if the theatre itself, international press, and the academic sources refer to it as the Mikha-I-lovsky? I will be most happy to get to know what you think, so we might agree on the best way forward.

https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2014/nov/23/mikhailovsky-ballet-new-york-review-lincoln-center-american-debut http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/22/arts/dance/22mikhailovsky.html?_r=0

Teatrplusnane (talk) 07:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Teatrplusnane: I moved the page back because the move that you have done was opposed in an RM from 6 years ago. I will ask with a message on your talk page for you to start a new RM next. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:45, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Year article header/test zc, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 ([User talk:MrLinkinPark333|talk]]) 02:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not within my focus at the moment- but there is huge potential. I have done a little on Strowger- and given some rich references- do you fancy getting involved- there is the whole nerdy field of touch tone frequencies, dialing pad layout- the 1950 three letter dialing codes (different mappings in US, Europe and UK). --ClemRutter (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 July 2016, Nakon explained to you "This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus." I don't see any consensus for this edit to Template:Infobox video game, nor do I believe it was done wisely; do you? --RexxS (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

you had the audacity of reverting one of my perfectly crafted edits. Let me explain why this was foolish. </irony>

We could use a different construction than the one given above, and what you changed would be right. This is, we could make a module into an ${\displaystyle S^{-1}R}$ module by defining

${\displaystyle {\frac {r}{s))\cdot {\frac {m}{s')):={\frac {rm}{ss'))}$.

But even this would first require the notion of a ring of fractions (although this wouldn't be a particular obstruction). The point is, as it is right now, we don't even have defined a multiplication on the given object, for we only have a multiplication

${\displaystyle R\times S^{-1}R\to S^{-1}R}$,

where ${\displaystyle S^{-1}R}$ now is the module defined from R as an R-module as in the first section of the article. At most, the underlying sets are equal, but we don't get a ring structure. --Mathmensch (talk) 05:41, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GeoffreyT2000, Thank you for reviewing, accepting and cleaning the article Allan J. Stitt. I appreciate. After your intervention, I just noticed that someone has put a couple of warning tags on top of the article. This really baffles me after the fact that you just accepted it and cleaned it accordingly. Can you please help about this situation? Much appreciated. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acumenmeister (talk • contribs) 14:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this move.

Generally, it's preferred to keep redirects of moved talks/talk subpages per WP:PMVR#rr step 4, the second/third bullet points. (Image to the right about the scenario (second diagram)).

Though I'd agree there's legitimate reason this particular redirect was suppressed, because the purpose of its root talk page changed, and now redirects to the dab talk. On the other hand, there are incoming links to that now redlinked talk subpage, so I'm personally unsure what is the best approach. I personally would have kept the redirect to avoid the link breaks. Anyway, not expecting a reply, just an FYI.

— Andy W. (talk · ctb) 18:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't exactly a swap, but ...along similar lines :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 18:04, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GeoffreyT2000. Thought I'd do a quick followup and plug a new script I wrote that semi-automates the round-robin process. The script is here (js). Essentially, you'd simply click "Swap" and enter a page destination, the script performs the 3 moves as necessary (saves time having to manually go through the move form 3 times). (It doesn't correct redirects afterwards, that's still manual)

Anyway feel free to adapt this script as you see fit, cheers :) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 02:25, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey GeoffreyT2000, I'm sorry for noticing that WBLN should have redirected to The WB 100+ Station Group page. :) — Anthony Abate (talk · ctb) 23:51, 02 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is notable, see edit summary at [1]. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there really no connection? How can one discern لوری from لور as different any more than one can discern کوردی from کورد ? Aren't their etymologies synonymous, just as Parsis (in India, that is) are to Persians or Iranis (in India) are to Iranians? Please explain the difference to me.

Shadzad (talk) 21:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you haven't seen it & you're still interested, just noting I replied to your question on ff ring extensions in the archives a few days ago.John Z (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, I'm going to ask you to revert your close of the above and let an administrator close it. The only keep ! Vote that expressed a policy based argument qualified his arguement with a statement accepting redirect to the community, an outcome that would also be acceptable to me. The other keep votes didn't rise above ilikeit. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 22:51, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings GeoffreyT2000. You recently moved Grand Duke of Luxembourg to Monarchy of Luxembourg although I don't see a clear consensus emerging from the discussion, especially taking into consideration the repeated move requests that were opposed earlier this year. I would suggest a relisting of the discussion to gather further input. — JFG ^talk 16:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there GeoffreyT2000,

I see that you've proposed the Waitlist Management page for deletion because of notability requirements. However, there are a lot of independent sources that discuss strategies and methods for waitlist management and this field is becoming one of increasing concern for both academics and urban businesses. Some of these sources include;

http://streetfightmag.com/2014/06/17/6-waitlist-management-tools-for-restaurants/

http://scholarship.sha.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1415&context=articles

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875898/

I wanted to write a page about waitlist management particularly because it's becoming an increasingly notable area of concern but doesn't have much light shed on it yet, and a Wiki page for it that connects multiple credible sources on the topic could become a growing center of information on the topic. Would it be possible to bring the page back under the pretense that I would revise it and incorporate sources that establish the topic's notability?

Best, Pantelo (talk) 18:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Pantelo[reply]

Dear Geoffrey hope you are well. I am really sorry for the deletion of the MacroGeo article but I must accept that your arguments stand. May I ask you on when it can be considered that the subject has enought notability in this case in order to relaunch it? Thank you. William MI6 — Preceding unsigned comment added by William MI6 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the edit that noted this person's support for Trump after the recent tape emerged. I tried to link to his Twitter page but it did not take. Please see the following. I assume there is a reliable way to do so that I am not familiar with...

https://twitter.com/rhowardbrowne?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.44.85.125 (talk) 02:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious about this close. May I know your reasoning behind closing this as keep? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lemongirl942: I closed it as keep given that a week has passed with only keep votes. The article was latter renominated by Marvellous Spider-Man, and Robert Niter was finally deleted by Black Kite. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 14:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mouthwash (number). Since you had some involvement with the Mouthwash (number) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Granger (talk · contribs) 10:55, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RollingFace99. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Achomi Language, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. RollingFace99 (talk) 09:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• The page Mark Jennings (Dynasty) was originally a redirect to Dynasty minor characters#Mark Jennings, but then TAnthony has added WikiProject templates to it before moving it to File talk:A Fire In The Sky Novelization Cover.jpg. To fix this, the first 3 revisions in the history of the file talk page should be split back to Mark Jennings (Dynasty). GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 14:00, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• I moved this message to here from Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Page Mark Jennings (Dynasty) contains only 5 edits, all deleted, all redirects. There is no point in shuffling redirect edits about between page histories. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:12, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• @Anthony Appleyard: I have recreated the redirect instead. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the move! Pyrusca (talk) 00:06, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]