- Category:Metrolink lines to Category:Metrolink (Southern California) lines – C2B per ‹The template Cat is being considered for merging.› Category:Metrolink (Southern California)/Metrolink (Southern California) Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Category:Metrolink templates to Category:Metrolink (Southern California) templates
- Category:Southern California Metrolink line maps to Category:Metrolink (Southern California) line maps
- Category:Metrolink navigational boxes to Category:Metrolink (Southern California) navigational boxes
- Category:Metrolink stations to Category:Metrolink (Southern California) stations
- Category:Former Metrolink stations to Category:Former Metrolink (Southern California) stations
- Category:Future Metrolink stations to Category:Future Metrolink (Southern California) stations
- Oppose all. Unnecessary over-disambiguation. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 05:39, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @James Allison you realize, don't you, that the "Metrolink" in S. Cal. is not the only "Metrolink" in the world? That's why the article and head category for the S. Cal. one are disambiguated. Good Ol’factory (talk) 05:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. The subcategories do not appear to be ambiguous with other transportation system category trees, and even if they were, they are unambiguous by letter case. Regards, James(talk/contribs) 14:48, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @James Allison but that's because the other categories that use the name "Metrolink" are already disambiguated! Why do the S. Cal. ones get the undisambiguated form when both the article and the head category are disambiguated? It doesn't make sense according to the usual practices of categorization ... Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|