Administrator instructions

Requests for permissions

This page enables administrators to handle requests for permissions on the English Wikipedia. Administrators are able to modify account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, file mover, extended confirmed, mass message sender, new page reviewer, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback, template editor rights and AutoWikiBrowser access.

Editors wishing to request a permission flag here should do so following the procedure below. Editors requesting permissions are advised to periodically revisit the requests page, as notifications will not always be given after a decision is made. Editors should not expect their request to be answered right away and should remember to be patient when filing a request. To find out what permissions your account has, go to Special:Preferences, where your permissions are listed in the user profile tab under "Member of groups".

Requests for permissions are archived regularly; please see Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Archive for an index of past requests.

Bot report: No errors! Report generated at 21:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Permissions

Handled here

Handled elsewhere

Several permissions are requested and handled elsewhere:

Removal of permissions

If you wish to have any of your permission flags (except administrator) removed, you should contact an administrator. If you want your administrator flag removed, you should contact a bureaucrat.

This is not the place to request review of another user's rights. If you believe someone's actions merit removal of a permission flag, you should raise your concern at the incidents noticeboard.

The bureaucrat, checkuser, and oversight flags are removed at meta:Steward requests/Permissions. Stewards will typically not carry out such requests unless they are made on behalf of the Arbitration Committee, by a user who is requesting their own access be removed, or in cases of an emergency.

Process

Requestors

To make a request for a permission, click "add request" next to the appropriate header and fill in the reason for wanting permission.

Any editor may comment on requests for permission.

Administrators

Full instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Administrator instructions

Administrators are permitted to grant account creator, autopatrolled, confirmed, event coordinator, file mover, mass message sender, page mover, pending changes reviewer, rollback and template editor flags to any user who meets the criteria explained above and can be trusted not to abuse the tool(s). Administrators may either grant these permissions permanently or temporarily. For convenience, a bot will automatically comment with relevant data if the user does not meet configurable qualifications. Even if the bot does not comment, administrators should review the user's contributions and logs to ensure the tools will be used appropriately and check for any indication of potential misuse.

Once an administrator has granted a permission or decided to deny a request, they should add ((done)) or ((not done)) respectively under the request with their comments. If a user already has the requested permission, or is autoconfirmed and requesting confirmed, ((already done)) should be used. N hours after the last comment was made (as specified by the config), the request will be archived automatically: approved requests will be placed here; declined requests will go here. See User:MusikBot/PermClerk#Archiving for more information on archiving functionality.

Current requests

Account creator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:Mleczekofficial

I would like the account creator right as I would like to help people. I work in IT Support and that means I have call-outs to help users. I once had this call out where a 64-year old person who could not set up a Google account. I want to request this permission so that I can help users having problems to create accounts. Everyone deserves a chance to be helped out, and everyone deserves to help those in need. Mleczekofficial (talk) 14:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request MusikBot talk 14:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly, you can already create up to 6 accounts a day, secondly, this isn’t google, so there isn’t anything that indicates that you need the right in your request. | Zippybonzo | Talk | 15:34, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You are not active in the WP:ACC process. stwalkerster (talk) 15:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)


User:Capsulecap

I'd like to do specific tasks in a way that is both automated and supervised (i.e. I review the edits before they are performed), and I think that AWB would be faster to configure than writing a bot task with the same purpose. I am planning on using AutoWikiBrowser to categorize pages gathered from related categories using keywords and data from infoboxes and to tag sourceless/one-source pages with the respectful maintenance tags. Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 00:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has approximately 109 non-automated edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 11:50, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't WP:HOTCAT be a better tool? Primefac (talk) 12:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not exactly sure if that's what HotCat does. I'll check it out sometime soon and withdraw my request if it fits my specifications. Capsulecap (talkcontribs) 22:29, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kazamzam

Hi! I do a lot of work with adding citations as part of WikiProject Unreferenced Articles, as well as clean-up of existing reference issues. I try to leave pages better than I found them by copyediting, removing promotional material/weasel words, adding pertinent links, etc. Additionally, I try to tag unreferenced articles appropriately, and remove the unreferenced tags from articles with sufficient citations, turn external links and notes into actually references when possible, and so on. I think AWB could be helpful with all of these things and hopefully help get through the unreferenced backlog more quickly. December 2009 has 19,000+ articles and I'm dreading it already. Thanks! Kazamzam (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Kazamzam (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:Dojcin94

There was a recent edit (yesterday) about "Saint Naum", please review and revert the change or grant me a permission, because now it says that Naum Ohridski is Bulgarian writer & missionary and also there were added some wrong data. I think the user who made this change should be banned for such a change, because he can't rewrite the history!!! Naum Ohridski was a Macedonian writer & missionary. Dojcin94 (talk) 20:50, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use ((Edit semi-protected)) to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! stwalkerster (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Event coordinator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:Jeremyb

Had the right before, was not inactive just was mostly using my sock jeremyb-phone. Still active with events which are starting to happen again. --Jeremyb (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Donexaosflux Talk 21:24, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Changewiki123

Reason for requesting event coordinator rights:

Part of our computing topic at Culloden Primary School is to create our own Wiki account and create our own page (one that isn't yet found on the platform). Our year 4 group consistes of 82 children but so far only 6 accounts have been created due to the restrictions in place. May you please allow us to create one account for each child from our same IP address so that we are fully capable of completing our exciting topic before the end of the school year? Changewiki123 (talk) 15:10, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi, @Changewiki123, are you familiar with the the WikiEDU program? (info link) That program may be able to help your students. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 20:13, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Hi, I also recommend https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Education. Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 00:09, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:James Moore200

Reason for requesting event coordinator rights I am a community leader at The Wikimedia Fan Club University of Ilorin and I will be coordinating WIki Loves SDGs Campus Tour this week till next month. I would help in creating account James Moore200 (talk) 18:21, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

File mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)


New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:HeinzMaster

Hi, I am requesting New Page Reviewer rights on Wikipedia. I believe that I have built a strong foundation and understanding of the requirements necessary for mainspace articles, shown through my created, active articles, draft articles, and contributions to them. As new page reviewer I'd like to apply this knowledge towards newly created articles and suggest any improvements when necessary. HeinzMaster (talk) 04:24, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HeinzMaster: You were previously granted NPP for a one month trial last year. How did that go? Is there a particular reason you waited until now to reapply? – Joe (talk) 14:18, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think it went well, only issue was I allowed some copyrighted content since I was under the impression that it was an automatic process for detection. However, I have since then become familiar with Copyvio Detector, hence I will check any new pages to be reviewed with that tool before undergoing any decisions. HeinzMaster (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done – Joe (talk) 13:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Grabup

I am contributing Wikipedia for about 8 months. I have now quite good knowledge about Guidelines of Wikipedia and now I understand that which page should be accepted and which not. I am genuinely improved Wikipedia by reverting vandalisms. I always prefer to discuss instead of an edit war. Thanks Grabup (talk) 02:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Johannes Maximilian

Hi there, I've recently seen the backlog and think that some help might be needed. I have been on Wikipedia for more than 13 years now, and I have made well over 30,000 edits across all projects, with multiple B class articles here on en-wp and several good and featured articles on the German language Wikipedia. I have done dozens of AfCs and I am thus very familiar with what people throw at Wikipedia. I know various different languages and I am (obviously) familiar with virtually all Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Best regards, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:42, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 16:42, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thank you for volunteering signed, Rosguill talk 19:15, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reading Beans

Hi, I'd like to help out with reviewing new pages. I have read and understand the reviewing guidelines, I'm comfortable with notability and deletion processes, and will carefully apply the flowchart to each page that I review if this request is approved. Furthermore, I am also an AFC reviewer, with this right, I’ll help ease some burden on the backlog. R E A D I N G Talk to the Beans? 05:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thank you for volunteering. I'm also going to assign you autopatrolled, since I don't think your creations need to be reviewed any longer. – Joe (talk) 15:03, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Netherzone

I am requesting new page reviewer rights to help with the backlog. I have a clear understanding of notability criteria, and am active at AfD, especially in the area of visual arts and culture. I have been an editor for over 10 years and have created over 160 active articles. I've read and understand the tutorial for reviewers. Netherzone (talk) 17:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thank you for volunteering. – Joe (talk) 13:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tigraan

My one-month trial recently expired (I learnt this when trying to greentick Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas after cleaning up the bad state it was in). In a month, I must have looked at 10-15 pages. I decided I did not want anything to do with most of them, made some small corrections to a few, marked one as patrolled, sent another one to AfD (it was kept, but I do not think the discussion reflects too badly on me). I think I CSD’d one or two but there is nothing in my Twinkle log so maybe I didn’t.

I do not think I will really ramp up my rate of reviews in the future, so I think it’s roughly the same situation as this, where a trial extension is needed before a full grant of the rights. TigraanClick here for my talk page ("private" contact) 13:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Every bit of help is needed, but have you fully read and digested WP:NPP and realised that it has a steep learning curve for something an editor might not be ready to commit to in depth? Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pppery

Since Buidhe requested I get involved with NPP on my talk page, and I meet the requirements with 10,000 mainspace edits and 6 years of activity, I might as well help out here. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:04, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thank you for volunteering. – Joe (talk) 08:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Storchy

I'd like permission to review draft articles, as I've come across several good quality drafts waiting in the long review queue, while I was doing other cleanup tasks. I believe I have sufficient experience editing to offer help with the draft article backlog. Thanks. Storchy (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Storchy (talk) 20:44, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Storchy: Did you mean to post this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants instead? This page is for requesting the permission to review new mainspace pages, not review drafts. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Aha, yes I did want that other permission, thanks. Storchy (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to interpret the above as  Request withdrawn signed, Rosguill talk 21:56, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:ProClasher97

Hi. I would like to request to become a new page reviewer because I believe that I have the understanding and experience required to use the tools effectively. I also would like to help reduce the backlog of new articles that need to be reviewed, and I believe that I would be able to help out with this a lot if I had the permissions. With regard to my statistics, I have been an editor since 2018, I have over 4,000 edits, I am a reviewer for AfC, I have lots of counter-vandalism experience (and lots of CSD experience), and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, including for notability, neutral point of view, and other policies related to page creation and CSD tagging (as it relates to unconstructive editing, such as dealing with vandalism and promotional articles). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 17:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:Zippybonzo

I do quite a lot of draftifying and a few uncontroversial page moves (e.g typos in the title) and I would like the right for a couple of months to see whether it saves me time when moving and whether it is easier for me to move pages with the right before requesting it permanently. Thanks, | Zippybonzo | Talk | 19:02, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I see only about 12 total moves to draft space, and the first one I checked had been an article for 14 years before it was draftified, which is not really in accordance with WP:DRAFTIFY. There are only 2 other moves in your move log, and outside of those moves, there is little to show experience moving pages according to policies and guidelines at this point, so I would suggest additional involvement in the move process before applying for this permission. Dekimasuよ! 07:22, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jonteemil

Hello! I was about to move a page and also its category only find out that the latter needs this permission. I will probably not be taking advantage of this right very often but when I do want to move a category it would be neat. I am both here and on Commons already trusted as file mover, AWB rights and have far more edits than the demanded 3000. I am also admin at Swedish Wiktionary. Jonteemil (talk) 20:06, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done at this time. Categories are not moved by the normal page move process, but via WP:CFD. (In fact, if you attempt to move a category page, you will receive a message stating that "Categories should not be moved without discussion and consensus at either Wikipedia:Categories for discussion or Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy.) Separately, your move log is not very long, but shows several moves described as "Official name used on website", "Seems to be the official name", or "Name change", but it should be noted that pages are not automatically moved to their official names on the English Wikipedia, per WP:OFFICIAL; instead, the WP:COMMONNAME in reliable secondary sources is preferred, and we normally wait for common usage to be reflected in secondary sources before changing article titles. Thanks for all your ongoing contributions, but I would suggest more experience with the move process here before the addition of this permission. Dekimasuよ! 07:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:Urban Versis 32

I have helped out Wikipedia in various ways (Adding short descriptions, creating userboxes, contributing images, etc.) and would love to expand that by becoming a Pending Changes Reviewer to help out removing vandalism. Urban Versis 32KB(talk | contribs) 17:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Grabup

I am contributing Wikipedia for about 8 months. I always keep my eyes to my Watchlist to undue vandalisms. I can use this user right very fairly. You can check my history of contribution. I always prefer to discuss instead of an edit war. I accept my mistake if someone prove me wrong. Thanks Grabup (talk) 02:59, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chocmilk03

I've been editing for over a year and have ~4000 edits. I'm familiar with the vandalism policy, with the basic content policies and with the copyright policy. I've read the reviewing guidelines and the other relevant pages (WP:PC etc), and understand that accepting is the default position while reverting should be limited to clear-cut cases, for example this diff would have been a clear-cut case of reverting. Cheers, Chocmilk03 (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:N8wilson

Like many editors with some history here I do much of this work already by way of my watchlist. I'm interested in this right as a toolset to speed up workflows. I enjoy working on pages that get tagged with ((Current)) and expect this toolset to help accelerate the incorporation of productive edits from new users and IPs. --N8wilson 🔔 17:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

clarification: I'm aware that ((Current)) and whitelock pages aren't implicitly related in any technical way. I mentioned it as an illustration of my motivations for contributing at WP: keeping things current, fresh, and up-to-date. --N8wilson 🔔 17:56, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pulpfiction621


I am requesting this permission because I focus on reverting vandalism and this permission would allow for me to be more effective in conducting this task. I have already been entrusted with the Rollback permission, have done nearly 6,500 edits so far, and am looking to improve the encyclopedia in any way that I can. Thank you. Pulpfiction621 (talk) 20:15, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Banglahindu

HI, Im am interested in becoming a pending changes reviewer. Please do the needful. Banglahindu (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 18 days and has 52 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 00:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, will apply after 90 days, when I am more established. Banglahindu (talk) 09:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per block for sockpuppetry. Ks0stm (TCGE) 00:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:ClydeFranklin

Hello! My name is Clyde, and I am a Wikipedian who mostly works in anti-vandalism. I have nearly 300 edits to the mainspace (verify) and already extendedconfirmed and a rollbacker (verify). CLYDE (TALK) 19:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jijisipu

Being the recent changes patroller I am already dealing with the bad faith edits to pending changes protected pages. I want to accept good faith edits on pending changes protected pages. So requesting the rights. Thank you. Jijisipu (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment), Given my comment at this AfD Jijisipu has become active on 1 July and done more than 570+ edits in just last three days. This account looks suspicious to me. I suggest being cautious while responding to this request. ─ The Aafī (talk) 09:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
TheAafi: My vote for delete based on the repeated removal of AFD template of that non notable website which you are also a part of it per this. If you suspect anything wrong happening here, MER-C can look this case. Jijisipu (talk) 09:23, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done yeah, not comfortable with this. You've been seriously editing for all of three days. MER-C 10:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries MER-C, I will come back later if possible. But please look into this connection of TheAafi with The Chenab Times and it's AFD. Thank you so much. Jijisipu (talk) 10:43, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:Jochem van Hees

I spend most of my time on Wikipedia checking and occasionally reverting other people's edits, so this user right would be helpful. Of course I'll only use it in cases of obvious vandalism (or other uses outlined at WP:ROLLBACKUSE). ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 22:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I reviewed your contributions and found little to no recent anti-vandalism work. If you're still interested in this tool then please spend at least a month actively patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & RedWarn can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please start warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, FASTILY 02:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Fastily: Little to no? I can give 39 examples from just this month. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39. Also, I regularly give warnings, just filter my contributions by user talk namespace and you'll find plenty. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 12:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A vandalism fighter will frequently make this many reverts and more in a single day, so yes, I'd like to see more dedication to anti-vandalism work before assigning you advanced permissions. Also, you're not consistently warning users when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4), please start doing that; I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or RedWarn which make this very easy. Like I said, if you want the right, then please spend a month patrolling RecentChanges before reapplying. Thanks, FASTILY 20:21, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah okay, thanks. ―Jochem van Hees (talk) 23:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:EnIRtpf09b

Hello, I am an active reverter of vandalism and I want to be a rollbacker so that I can fight vandalism in Wikipedia with more ease and efficiency. I have read the WP:Rollback policy and take full responsibility if I abuse my rollbacker right. EnIRtpf09b (talk)

 Done -FASTILY 22:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:MehmoodS

I have made over 3,300 edits since I became active editor. I have several pages under my watch list and patrolled RecentChanges for possible disruption and vandalism. I have dealt with numerous vandalism on several pages and warned editors. Therefore, I would like to request Rollback rights to be able to deal with vandalism more effectively. MehmoodS (talk) 17:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). MusikBot talk 18:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I sampled your recent reverts and found numerous instances where you are reverting good faith edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4). To be clear, none of these edits contsitute vandalism. If you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor; I recommend using tools such as Twinkle or RedWarn which make this very easy. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. -FASTILY 22:48, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Blanchey

I have now spent a few more weeks patrolling Recent changes following Fastily's advice and I now feel that I have enough experience in anti vandalism work to use the rollback function properly. If you check my contributions, you will see all the articles I have been patrolling. Whilst I have been using Twinkle's Rollback–like function very intuitively when removing vandalism, I think that the official Wikipedia rollback function will be even more helpful, especially when I am using the mobile site. This is the 3rd request I have sent now, but I am very keen and I just want to help keep Wikipedia free of as much disruption as possible. On a couple of occasions, I did revert edits which turned out to be correct after all, and I also accidentally reverted several edits when I only meant to remove one and I take full responsibility. It was completely my fault and I apologised to the users in question. I look forward to hearing from you regarding my request. Kind Regards, Blanchey 💬📝 14:11, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([2][3]). MusikBot talk 14:20, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Also, as we discussed, please take more care to ensure that you are actually removing vandalism when reverting. Thanks, FASTILY 22:58, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Blanchey 💬📝 06:42, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
(add requestview requests)

User:Ilovemydoodle

Hi, I am frequent editor of Templates on (English) Wikiquote, I would like Template Editor here to better maintain Templates across wikis. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 05:55, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 9 days, has 110 total edits and has 20 edits in the template and module namespaces. MusikBot talk 12:40, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Additional information for Wikiquote:
This user has has an account for 85 days, has 7,173 total edits and has 2,146 edits in the template and module namespaces.
Ilovemydoodle (talk) 06:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please can you give an example of a template you would like to edit and describe the change you would make? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:52, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikiquote:Wikiquote:Requests for adminship#Requests for Template editor — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done is far short of the community expectations for access to this permission. Most templates are not protected and may be edited, for others please use the request an edit function. — xaosflux Talk 21:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Not to pile on, but in case anyone else is questioning the above outcome: I worry about template editing skills if this user page is representative. Also, the editor has so many edits in Template space on Wikiquote because they make many small edits to live templates instead of (or in addition to?) simply copying working templates from en.WP or elsewhere. There are also attribution questions with most of their creations. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]