Welcome to Wikipedia, LaundryPizza03! Thank you for your contributions. I am Babymissfortune and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type ((help me)) at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bananana (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding ((U|I dream of horses)) to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional rogue planets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

We already have Category:Rogue planets in fiction.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

... by the meaning of the edit summary of this edit. Can you explain what that means? Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@LaundryPizza03: Anybody home here? - DVdm (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I apologize for being silly. It is unlikely that I will do it again. It’s an onomatopoeia for the sound effect of falling into a black hole in Super Mario Galaxy. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 08:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ok, I see hear. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please make sure that when you are nominating redirects that you tag the redirects you are nominating with ((Rfd)). I just fixed 2 redirects you did not tag: [1] and [2]. How to tag redirects for RfD is outlined in step 1 of the name nomination instructions. Steel1943 (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intonjane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homestead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was unaware that I was linking to a dab. However, it looks like the correct sense is that mentioned at the top of the page. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry but I think it would be better if you did not use the technical move request for a time. The recent requests you have made such as this one Hebrew language and this one have been completely outside and beyond what is uncontroversial. Is that okay? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi! The Mark Sandler page appears to have text copied word-for-word from this source:

"2014 elevated fellow". IEEE Fellows Directory. ((cite web)): Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

I'm uncertain if that was actually a copyright violation, because the phrase may be too short to be copyrightable or the page it was copied from may be in the public domain.

--Sir Beluga (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is for certain is that Earwig turned up nothing. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed that you tagged File:Dangerous Curves.jpg for deletion. When you encounter a screenshot with an inadequate fair use rationale, you should consider whether it would be appropriate to add the standard text "for identification of and critical commentary on the television program and its contents" to the rationale rather than tagging it for deletion. I have added the standard rationale and removed the speedy tag. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4D film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bubble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Did you catch my reply to your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Redirect request: Ministeriidae? 82.9.105.98 (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Fictional rogue planets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just a quick word about what notability is – a topic qualifies if it is supported by multiple reliable sources, somewhere in the world. They do not have to be online – a single manuscript copy in a remote monastery could be such a source – and still less do they have to be actually in the article. This matters when considering articles for deletion, as it means we have to make reasonable efforts to check whether sources exist: it is no good just looking at the article. So, a totally unsourced article on a topic that has been extensively written about is notable, while an elegantly sourced piece of puffery about a non-notable book or person might not be. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Film adaptation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Total Recall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An article you recently created, T̃, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 19:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Needs more citations, and clearer context. What sound does this letter produce in IPA?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:T̃ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:T̃, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, LaundryPizza03! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Forget it, I'll just redirect this page to Stop squark until an expert can complete this. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 03:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi LaundryPizza03 -- I've declined this deletion request and worked a bit to establish Trang's notability, which now seems fairly clear. It's not required to pop the name into Google before requesting deletion, but can save everyone time where there are many sources readily available in English to support notability, as well as being polite to the original contributor. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The diagram, as I understand it, simply represents that the universe can be either expanding or contracting, with the small endpoint being an undifferentiated energy blob, while the large end is a sparse universe. I don't see it immediately obvious that the caption is wrong. Regards Tarl N. (discuss) 02:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Anyway, it is vague. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Poorly phrased, I'll certainly grant you. Tarl N. (discuss) 02:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi. I created an edit in terms of show creator, because the concept is actually made by my team, which is Programming Indosiar. We do not have any reliable source, because there is no news coverage that reported our existence - it is a teamwork afterall :) So please advise the solution, because i can guarantee you, my team actually has or owned the concept. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProgrammingIndosiar (talk • contribs) 10:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Sorry, content on Wikipedia must be verifiable. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I would be interested to hear in what way you think this information is indiscriminate. WP:IINFO is focused on excessively long insertions of primary information. This template is a very small, precisely defined group of only twenty members. SpinningSpark 17:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• It's not an encyclopedic trait of these people. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • So how would you distinguish this template from, say, Template:Nobel Prize in Physics? The members are no more connected in general. Or perhaps you would be in favour of deleting that one too? I'm struggling to understand your position. SpinningSpark 21:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Trivial. Is that adequate enough? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • You're entitled to your opinion, but most people would think that having a unit named after someone in the worldwide system of units was a pretty big deal. SpinningSpark 13:06, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Danger opportunity. Since you had some involvement with the Danger opportunity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You left this query at the deleted talk page Template talk:Requires attention:

Note to deleting administrator: Do you suppose the Bhojpuri version could also be deleted?

I deleted the English template, but I'm not an admin on that Wiki, and it's up to that community to determine whether they want to keep their template or not. Decisions made on enwiki aren't binding anywhere else. If you want to delete it there, I suggest either finding a Bhojpuri admin, or following whatever process they have for deletions. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Never do this without an edit summary. Any editors who had the page watchlisted would not be able to tell that you nominated the page for deletion without looking at it. Thank you, postdlf (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:LaundryPizza03/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:LaundryPizza03/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KJP1 (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at M22 graph instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:M22 graph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:M22 graph, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "((db-self))" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Legacypac (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paddock (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paddock, Nebraska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Thittuvilai. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Must have been an error. Sorry about that. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:44, 12 June 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, there are plenty of entries on this list that are not in List of nuclides, so rather than deleting the article, if the page must die, it should be merged. Serendi^podous 17:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello, LaundryPizza03. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Spectral gap (physics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:John A. Hannah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Would you consider describing at Talk:Ulam spiral what sorts of additional footnotes would be helpful? I don't believe there is anything contentious in this article, but if you disagree, please indicate which statements are the problematic ones. Will Orrick (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I hope you don't mind my additions to your bananaman article. Dwanyewest (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In this edit to ((relevance inline)) you attempted to turn Category:Wikipedia articles that may have off-topic sections into a dated maintenance category, but you didn't do everything that's required for that to work correctly. You'll need to add the appropriate templates to the category page, and create a few more pages those depend on. See Wikipedia:Creating a dated maintenance category for details. Anomie⚔ 13:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I noticed the explain tag you added to the article. Although it will require some research on my part, I'm willing to have a go at addressing the issue, but I want to make sure I'm clear on what the issue is first. Would it be better to focus on the meaning of the claim, or are you looking for a brief sketch of the proof? Would adding a reference or better wikilinks suffice? Will Orrick (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just the definition. It is jargon. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. I have added a definition of the term. Let me know if you think more is needed. Will Orrick (talk) 03:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello Laundry,

Would you please go to Talk:Planck units and itemize, or at least outline, the specific incidents of OR there? Then the physics community can discuss it and act on it. Thank you. 50.47.109.91 (talk) 05:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, your signature is using substitution to evade the prohibition against signatures longer than 255 characters; it says at WP:SIGLEN, "The software will automatically truncate both plain and raw signatures to 255 characters of code in the Signature field. If substitution of templates or another page is used, please be careful to verify that your signature does not violate the 255-character length limit when the templates are expanded...."

I was able to construct a signature string for you just under the limit at 253 characters, using HTML5-compliant markup, by using 3-digit colors that match your 6-digit colors almost exactly.

You are encouraged to change

–[[User:LaundryPizza03|'''<font color=#7f7fbf>Laundry</font><font color=#ffbf00>Pizza</font><font color=#bf0000>03</font>''']] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<font color=#00df00>d</font>]][[Special:Contributions/LaundryPizza03|<font color=#00bfff>c&#x0304;</font>]])  : –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)

to

–[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄;</span>]]) : –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄;)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Would you please take care of this now? Most users comply with these requests to bring signatures into compliance. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You should have posted this at the bottom, and I have moved this accordingly. But I will comply. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:40, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have changed the signature to exactly what was specified, save for an extraneous semicolon. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]