April 24
File:WildlifeBlueHeronUtah.jpg
Utah license plates
File:Hyperspace 2020.jpg
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hyperspace 2020.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Theepicguys (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Does not pass WP:NFCC: not required to understand the topic, not discussed critically, purely used as decoration, and the differences between this and the standard cover can be adequately described in text. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:26, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- In doubt - Prove it that the readers usually blast it away (or understand correctly) without the album cover, but I support the reason that the topic isn't discussed critically (refer to Talk:Hyperspace (album)) see that there isn't any comments on the article talk page. Kys5g talk! 16:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The covers are substantially the same and the alternate cover is not the subject of significant sourced commentary. -- Whpq (talk) 02:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- File:4-cube 4^4.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Spinningspark (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file is located on Commons but it has not been deleted because uploader added a ((Keep local)). The file is not used on the front page or heavily used so the only reason for the Keep local is that the uploader found it easier to monitor files when they are local.
Sadly the uploader User:Spinningspark is deceased since more than a year ago so he can no longer monitor the files even if they are local. So the reason for the keep local is no longer there.
Files with a keep local can’t be deleted per CSD F8 but should be nominated for deletion. Per a few old discussion from September 23, 2020, October 1, 2020 and October 14, 2020 files can be deleted even if it has a keep local if uploader is no longer active and there is no other reason to keep it.
Spinningspark have uploaded more files with a keep local and many of those are most likely on Commons. If this file is deleted the question is if a FFD is needed for every single file of if there is a better way. MGA73 (talk) 13:57, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I removed the FFD notice from Spinningspark's takl page because he is deceased. If anyone feel it is better to leave the notice there feel free to revert my removal. --MGA73 (talk) 14:01, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Could CSD be used with a comment that the user is deceased? Constant314 (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps an idea could be to PROD the files with the rationale given above? Very likely to result in the same outcome as the CSD nomination while giving anyone watchlisting the file who may have an interest in it being kept locally a chance to speak up? Felix QW (talk) 07:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Both a CSD and a PROD works for me! --MGA73 (talk) 15:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Sadly, the reason for keeping local is no longer applicable. Such files do not fit a CSD criteria but PROD would be okay. -- Whpq (talk) 02:44, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Photo of Elsie Driggs.jpg
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 02:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Photo of Elsie Driggs.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by WomenArtistUpdates (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Now PD on Commons: c:File:Elsie-Driggs.jpg. Yann (talk) 19:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom, version on Commons is better. --MGA73 (talk) 16:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Blatant violation of 1st criterion (copyright registered before 1929, 1927; now no longer protected). Also exists on Commons without "don't upload" notice or keep local request (CSD F8). More generally, reduction is good if it's non-free but beware of 8th criterion. By replacing the non-free copy with PD copy in the article that the image was used, then what the replacement deserves is removal in CSD F5. Kys5g talk! 14:39, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
