The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t c) 07:00, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alois Nashali

[edit]
Alois Nashali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a filmmaker, not properly referenced as passing WP:CREATIVE. The only notability claim in evidence here is that he won a couple of awards at minor film festivals that aren't highly notable enough to clear WP:ANYBIO — "notable because award" requires awards that get media coverage, and does not attach to awards that can be referenced only to the awarding organization's self-published press releases because journalistic reportage about the award presentation is non-existent. This article, however, is referenced almost entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all — and of the three sources that actually are to real media outlets, one just tangentially verifies the existence of somebody else's film while completely failing to mention Alois Nashali at all, which means it's not relevant support for his notability either.
And of the two real media sources that are about him, they are both just reprints in two different newspapers of the same wire service article, thus combining into one data point for the purposes of determining whether he gets over WP:GNG or not — and they're covering him not in the context of anything related to film, but in the context of having contracted COVID-19 at his day job in a warehouse, thus just making him a WP:BLP1E at best. People do not get an automatic free pass over GNG just because they can show one piece of human interest coverage about their physical health challenges, and nothing stated in the article is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have a lot more and better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 15:59, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.