The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 02:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Knorr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:notability outside the context of Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme which already covers everything. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 19:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notability whatsoever outside of the Mantria scam; no reasonably reliable sources establish that she's done anything else that's received even minor independent coverage. dci | TALK 19:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete. Are you saying that running the biggest green energy scam in US history is not notable enough? That seems significant along, does one need to organize 2 of the biggest scams to be on wikipedia. This is on the top 50 list of biggest scams in the world. Should we remove Timothy McVeigh because he only blew up one big building? These guidelines are arbitrary, I believe. Richtowragg (talk) 19:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please see my comment at the Wragg AfD. dci | TALK 20:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent notability. All the info here is encompassed by the scope of the Mantria article Noq mentions. Ducknish (talk) 22:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per WP:BARE - there is some coverage. I can't figure out significant the coverage is about her specifically, without reading every article and link on Google. Not worth it for me; she's more like Amanda Snore. Bearian (talk) 17:10, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme. WP:BLP1E, should not have its own page but is a likely search term, searchers should be pointed the the scheme if interested in the subject. J04n(talk page) 18:03, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete then Redirect to Mantria Corporation Ponzi Scheme, this is a classic WP:BLP1E case. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.