The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete, suggestion that it should be moved to draft space because he will be a senior international soon is purely speculative, and no real significant coverage indicated in the discussion below to suggest a wider GNG pass is likely either now or in the near future. Fenix down (talk) 23:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Hakim Bappy[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY BlameRuiner (talk) 11:41, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - please can an admin revert the inappropriate move to draft? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:18, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that the page creator did the draft move, they shouldn't be able to move it back to the mainspace as they will need to request the move through WP:RM. It might be the best compromise as this could be closed as a no quorum in which this can be brought back to AfD if the article for whatever reason does not get improved when moved from draftspace. – The Grid (talk) 13:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In my view, I would still want to see some sort of demonstration of notability before allowing it to be draftified. Draft space shouldn't be for non-notable topics but, in the context of footballers, it's usually used for footballers who are on the verge of becoming notable (e.g. only recently signed for a team in a fully pro league) or footballers who are clearly notable but where the article just needs work. I'm not sure if either of those really apply here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved back to mainspace. Giant Snowman 18:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 18:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- can this article be moved to the draft space for further improvement and to avoid deletion??FNH004 (talk) 09:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftifty - will potentially meet NFOOTBALL in next year or so. No need deleting. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and don't draftify per WP:CRYSTAL. Geschichte (talk) 18:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.