The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Other than the article's author (who has a very limited editing history), unanimous consensus to delete for lack of WP:RS and failure to meet WP:GNG or WP:NBOOKS -- RoySmith (talk) 16:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An Empty Hug a love story[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. If there was an appropriate CSD cat I would use it. TheLongTone (talk) 14:11, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Self-published book, no coverage on it Galobtter (pingó mió) 14:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The author, Abhijeet Sarswat, is clearly non notable....the more things a person is described as doing (entrepreneur, musician, chicken-sexer and saggar-maker's bottom-knocker) the less likely I am to suppose they can do any of them.TheLongTone (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Books fails WP:GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. L3X1 (distænt write) 14:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NBOOKS. Newimpartial (talk) 15:01, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of reliable sources coverage and did not find any Atlantic306 (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete This has news coverage in India reffer the link - ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graphicbaba (talk • contribs) 06:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, that looks like coverage, though I can't tell how much/what it is about since it is in hindi. Also, need more than one piece of coverage, and the entire article is completely poor in tone/content - compare with any other article on a book. Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete This book has more news coverage in India also the famous Indian classical vocalist Pt. Raghunandan Panshikar talked about book refer the link http://zunjarneta.com/date/20171225/page/7/ ^[2]Abhijeet G. Sarswat - Animator cum Designer 04:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graphicbaba (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:46, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Delete Getting more news coverage about the book in indian newspapers https://web.archive.org/web/20171226033212/http://parshvbhumi.com/date/20171226/page/6/^[3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Graphicbaba (talk • contribs) 04:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--All sources are non-RS.Promo-spam.Winged Blades^Godric 15:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.