The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), Nominator withdrew nomination. — CactusWriter | ^needles 06:38, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ananda Tandavam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Notabilty not asserted. No sources, references or citations support the article's importance/notability. Mspraveen (talk) 15:25, 1 September 2008 (UTC) -- Withdrawn nomination Mspraveen (talk) 05:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete - As a G4, recreation of deleted material. So tagged. TN‑X-Man 16:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I am striking my earlier speedy delete !vote, per the reference Eastmain has provided. However, I do not feel the references listed provide significant coverage of the film. TN‑X-Man 03:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Per the excellent sources added to the article. Cheers! TN‑X-Man 00:12, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. See http://www.cinesouth.com/masala/hotnews/new/10092007-2.shtml for a reference. If CineSouth is a reliable source, then the concerns in the earlier AfD no longer apply. --Eastmain (talk) 23:12, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as THIS search brings forth many more sources to prove notabilty. Poor sourcing is not a reason to delete. Will tag it for rescue. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:06, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Protonk (talk) 18:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - unfortunately, the above search only shows 15 hits, 3 of which are Wiki and 10 are unreliable blog sources. The only source of information remains the cinesouth which by itself isn't strong documentation. — CactusWriter | ^needles 19:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as not notable per WP:NOTCRYSTAL and WP:NFF. This article is premature. When, and if, the film is released and it receives enough coverage to become notable, then the article should be posted. — CactusWriter | ^needles 19:09, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm striking my previous delete given the new addition of this legitimate reliable source, with the suggestion that notability should be based on the author Sujatha. — CactusWriter | ^needles 10:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • Hold on just a sec.... Under the alternate spelling of Ananda Thandavam and a slightly different seasrch, I have found numerous sources to show that the film had been filming at least as early as February 2008. Its not WP:Crystal. Further, I have found more to show notability and will add them as External Links so it will be easier to improve the article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:58, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update Just expanded and cited the entire article. Whew. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:27, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep with the excellent sourcing from several reliable sources including The Hindu. I wish to withdraw the proposed deletion. Great work, MichaelQSchmidt! Mspraveen (talk) 03:45, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.