The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anarcho-Objectivism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It fails the notability test and its category is fabricated. Google returned these references with this title: four blogs - http://anarchobjectivist.wordpress.com/tag/anarcho-objectivism/ and http://objectivistgirl.com/2014/04/anarcho-objectivism/ , http://anarchoobjectivist.blogspot.com/ , http://www.solopassion.com/node/1294 a facebook page, and a couple of reddit posts (another type of ‘wiki’ blog)

Since this subject is based upon blogs, and a facebook page, I believe it fails the notability requirement. I searched news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images with no returns.

I was surprised to find Category:Anarcho-capitalism. This category seems to be fabricated also and populated with supposed Anarcho-capitalists. After reviewing about 10 of these ‘ people’ pages that are grouped in this category. I found no references to anyone of them claiming to be an Anarcho-capitalist. I also recommend that this category be eliminated because it claims that those individuals listed in the category to be something that their Wikipedia articles do not support. bpage (talk) 23:37, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your confusion about the anarcho-capitalism category; anarcho-objectivism is arguably a subset of anarcho-capitalism. What do you mean by "fabricated"? Many articles are related to the topic of anarcho-capitalism, hence the category. Also, there are no biographies in this category, although there certainly are in the subcategory Category:Anarcho-capitalists. It is possible that there are a few miscategorized articles in this category—I have not checked them all—but I recognize many anarcho-capitalists in it. Which category members do you believe to not be anarcho-capitalists?

Categorization aside, I agree with you about the main subject of this AfD—anarcho-objectivism does appear to be sufficiently notable to have its own article. --Cgtdk (talk) 07:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Clearly fails WP:GNG, appears to be pure original research.--JayJasper (talk) 20:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is original research not supported by sources. TFD (talk) 16:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete sources are not optional. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:45, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Appears to fail WP:N. Not finding coverage in reliable sources upon source searches. Also has zero Google Books hits (other than the Wikipedia page) and zero Google Scholar hits. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - my results on the topic exactly match Northamerica1000's. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:42, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.