The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per inadequate sourcing or evidence of notability. Only the article's creator apparently views it otherwise. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 21:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Henderson (entrepreneur)[edit]

Andrew Henderson (entrepreneur) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, promotional (self-promotional?). The notion of being a "migration expert" is dubious to me – there is no evidence of his expertise other than having founded a company that makes claims. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Weak sourcing with passing mentions. Oaktree b (talk) 16:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete buzzword filled article on a non-notable business consultant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, sourcing is weak. The subject works in an area that is probably notable (citizenship-by-investment and the "purchase" of citizenship by the rich; the acquisition of multiple passports by those who can), but the sources are primarily about the area, and not the subject of this article. The sources merely draw on his sound-bites and advertising material to illustrate their discussion of the subject, using him only in passing. Elemimele (talk) 18:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Inadequate sourcing to meet notability, per WP: GNG. Reads like WP:RESUME & WP:ADMASQ. NiklausGerard (talk) 02:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per those above. Weak sourcing and this thing is SEO-ed to the absolute max which raises concerns of paid editing. We're also bordering on WP:SNOW territory. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep There is no paid editing involved here. Come on now! I just thought that the news coverage surrounding Andrew Henderson could serve as a foundation for the page. The Forbes and CNBC articles were all derived from Nomad Capitalist research, according to the content, so Henderson and his company weren't just passing mentions. They drove that content entirely. Doctorstrange617 (talk) 14:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.