The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jayjg (talk) 02:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lacks credible third party sources. not a notable person (TurnWild (talk))
Keep - third party sources are in the article itself including a full article on Forbes specifically about the person as the main subject. -- Whpq (talk) 14:36, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Look at the Sunday Times giving a 2 page story just about Sasson. This with the Forbes article above pretty much cinches the notability claim for me. The article is in terrible shape, as it was created by a paid advertiser, but that means it needs to be fixed, not deleted. -- Atama頭 01:14, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for the reasons well stated above. Glenfarclas (talk) 11:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.