The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:19, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aneel Murarka

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this meets WP:GNG and a WP:BEFORE didn't turn up much. Someone more familiar with Indian news and corporations might be able to find something. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. BuySomeApples (talk) 23:19, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:46, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per quick sources check:

1,2,12,14,18 — error 404
7,15,16,18 — other access errors (maybe for me)
3,4,5,6,11,13 — laudatory articles with no byline
8 — the same text from 6
9 — this domain is for sale
10 — he didn't mentioned
17 — the first article with a byline, but it's a trivial mention

I haven't made an attempt to find reliable sources myself, but I suppose if he even suddenly has notability, the article should be rewritten using better materials. Suitskvarts (talk) 18:22, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and above fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.