The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 23:02, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo De Augustine[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The artist has one "bona fide studio album" on a minor label. Half the references are simply invitations to stream or watch the material, which is marginally promotional. And the information provided is little more than the discography. WP:TOOSOON. ubiquity (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus T·C 20:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus T·C 20:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Doug Mehus T·C 20:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Soft keep or, possibly even, Keep Notability guidelines for biographies. Emerging consensus at Erica C. Barnett's deletion discussion seems to be favouring keep despite most of that article's references being to the Seattle journalist-turned-Internet-blogger's investigative journalism examples of events at Seattle city hall. Angelo De Augustine has one or more "bona fide" studio albums, been reviewed by Paste and Anna Wintour's VOGUE magazine, and had reviews of his works published in Exclaim!, The Irish Times, and National Public Radio (NPR). I would actually argue WP:TOOSOON favours keep in this case due to their being significant press coverage about him or his albums. He kind of feels like a Dallas Smith (singer) to me, in terms of level of notoriety. Doug Mehus T·C 20:23, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: seems to pass at least criterion 1 of WP:MUSICBIO by having his last two albums widely reviewed [1], [2], not just in the US but by reputable publications in Canada and the UK as well, which makes it more likely that there are articles or features on the subject himself aside from the reviews. Richard3120 (talk) 22:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as his works have been reviewed in multiple reliable sources such as Exclaim, The Irish Times, NPR and others shown at metacritic linked above imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Richard3120. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the above discussion. Aoba47 (talk) 22:53, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.