The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 01:25, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Angelos Tsiaklis[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CSD G4 rejected, because administrator got confused between FC United of Manchester and Manchester United. Fails the same as what he did in the previous AfD (now playing at a lower level too). He fails WP:ATHLETE as he has not played at a fully-professional level of football. Also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of siginificant media coverage past the odd WP:NTEMP stuff. --Jimbo^[online] 08:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Geschichte (talk) 13:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - In terms of notability, not much has changed since last July. He still fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. In my opinion, this is a clear G4 speedy deletion, but since that's all ready been tried and rejected, a slower deletion is perefectly acceptable. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet the inclusion criterion for athletes or the primary inclusion criterion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:17, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete has not played in a fully-pro league, thus failing WP:ATHLETE. No significant third-party coverage fails the wider scope of WP:GNG Steve-Ho (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I am the so-called "admin" who declined the G4 speedy on this one, and I would like to thank the nom for pointing out my mistake. However, the fact I will probably not be the only one making that mistake is the only thing that prevented me from reinserting the G4 tag I removed. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 03:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. However, as the other so-called "admin" who removed the speedy tag, I'd point out that the db-repost tag was in fact invalid because the article included a credible enough claim of significance (a lower standard than notability) relating to events postdating the initial AFD. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Has never kicked a ball in a fully professional league. Fails WP:ATH. --Mkativerata (talk) 23:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'd like to remind the above that Tsiaklis is a footballer, and WikiProject Football's notability criteria is widely held as supplementary to WP:ATHLETE's criteria when describing footballers. Tsiaklis passes two of WP:FOOTYN's notability criteria: he has played a game (albeit a single game) for a fully professional club at a national level (the Conference National is the lowest level of national football in England, but it is still a national level league, hence the name) and he has played a competitive game between two fully professional clubs - Wrexham A.F.C. and Cambridge United F.C.. Thus, Tsiaklis meets the criteria to be kept. Falastur2 ^Talk 14:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He fails WP:ATH. --Carioca (talk) 19:42, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 00:38, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 00:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.