The result was delete. The consensus is clear enough: that the sources presented do not demonstrate significant coverage in reliable sources. Mkativerata (talk) 05:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article does not meet the GNG - there is not significant independent coverage of this topic in third-party, reliable sources. Of the sources listed in the article, 4 are the embassy itself (not third-party), 1 is a map that verifies the consulate exists, and one, a NYT article, it focused on the city of Houston and links with Africa in general, with only a few sentences that mention this consulate. That is trivial coverage at best. Karanacs (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator. Karanacs (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]