The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ankr[edit]

Ankr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Couldn't find any notable RS mentions in brief web search.

^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. ^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cryptocurrency-related deletion discussions. ^Hidden_{Lemon /}^{/ talk} 18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep because Wikipedia needs better coverage of cryptocurrencies. Article needs more work, not deletion. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 03:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - just because its crypto it doesn't mean its spam. There are plenty more news about this in Google news. NASDAQ article is in-depth. Boredathome101 (talk) 01:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Giving it one more relist. More time is needed to discuss regarding the sources in the article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 14:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - the question is not "is crypto notable?" The question is "Has THIS particular item received enough coverage in reliable sources to establish notability?" The two "keep" comments are not answering this question one way or the other. PianoDan (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This nasdaq article is taken from investorplace. There is no significant coverage in RS anywhere. How many thousands of erc20 based tokens are there? Are we going to have articles on all those? Is there any evidence of WP:SUSTAINED coverage? The $1b mcap is something, but given the volatility of crypto derivatives long term notability is in question. - hako9 (talk) 08:31, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Pure cryptospam. The "Nasdaq article" is a reprint from InvestorPlace, not actually from Nasdaq. Investorplace seems to be the primary source of coverage on this in fact, and has all the signs of a non-independent stockpicking site. There is not a shred of independent, reliable coverage. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 13:33, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Ankr is a reputable and recognized company and organization with millions of pageviews, visitors, users, and investors. This page is within all Wikipedia guidelines and will serve the public best as many are searching for information on this subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdwyer2231 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC) — Kdwyer2231 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.