The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ann Torregrossa[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and being the director of a department in the Pennsylvania Governor's office doesn't pass WP:NPOL. The page has not been updated since at least 2011 when Torregrossa left the Office of Health Care Reform. GPL93 (talk) 15:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Delete. This is a role that could get her into Wikipedia if she could be reliably sourced over WP:GNG for it, but not one that guarantees her the right to keep a poorly sourced article just because she exists. The only references here, however, are government-published primary sources, not real media coverage about her work. Bearcat (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing to the page. Whether she is notable or not is one thing, but a 2 sentence page has no place on WikipediaMaskedSinger (talk) 19:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Au contraire, WP:TOOLITTLE q.v. Sam Sailor 08:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are right my learned friend. Size of article isn't an issue but that's if the person is as notable as Justin Bieber or Michael Jordan. Not the case with Ann Torregrossa, so yes she needs a more significant article to establish her notability. As WP:TOOLITTLE say a small amount of information meeting the general notability guideline can be eligible for inclusion, provided that other inclusion guidelines are met. This clearly isn't the case as you yourself agree by you voting to delete!
Delete. Not sourced to meet WP:BASIC/WP:GNG, nor presumed notable under WP:POLITICIAN. Delete per WP:DEL8. Sam Sailor 08:41, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 21:58, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The one-sentence-lead-one-sentece-article model permeating this website is getting ridiculous. Trillfendi (talk) 15:47, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The wording of WP:NPOL -- Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or sub-national (e.g., province- or state-wide) office -- doesn't explicitly state that one has to be an elected official to meet NPOL. The office she holds - Director of the Office of Health Care Reform - is a technically a state-wide office. Ergo, she is notable under WP:NPOL. That said, the article's quality does not look good right now. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 03:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Office of Healthcare reform was not a statewide agency, it’s a division within the Governor’s

Office. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:30, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.