The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that MUSICBIO isn't met Nosebagbear (talk) 22:12, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Annabel Jarman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NMUSICBIO. Mccapra (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Idaho-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:35, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the local coverage about her scholarship does not add up to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:46, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't find any coverage besides what is in the article - and that is either not independent, or minor local coverage. RebeccaGreen (talk) 16:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.