The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This is coming in as a Weak Keep, bordering on No Consensus. But Keep it is. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Annavru (2003 film)

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The film has two big stars but can't find any reliable sources or reviews (the ones currently on the article are not considered reliable per Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force). Usually, Deccan Herald would review this language of films, but this site is not working properly. All the sources that are reliable are passing mentions: here, here, here and here. It would be nice if someone could find the Deccan Herald review or any review if they exist.

Main problem is that due to the lack of reviews -- it is not possible to source the plot/figure out what the character names of the cast is. The film currently fails Wikipedia:Notability (films). DareshMohan (talk) 00:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Yes, there are no reviews accessible. But I believe the "Ambarish Amazing" source can qualify as RS since it is an interview. Also, Viggy must qualify as RS since it is one of the few sources covering Kannada films of the early 2000s. Editor5454, are there any Kannada-language sources for this film? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Viggy must qualify as RS according to me too. And no, I have not been able to find Kannada-language sources for this film. Editor5454 (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think Viggy is reliable? @Ab207:@Kataariveera:@PravinGanechari:. Viggy is mentioned at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force one time but nobody answered the question. Maybe if someone created a Wikipedia page for Viggy, then it could be reliable. DareshMohan (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Many websites were created for business, its information is in a 2009 news paper, I do not believe this website to be reliable.[1] PravinGanechari (talk) 08:48, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If Viggy can be established as a notable source, I will happily withdraw my nomination. DareshMohan (talk) 07:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep : Viggy can be considered as reliable source especially for the movies from late 90s to early 2000s since it was one of the very few portal covering movie news and reviews from Kannada ( along with Chitraloka). Here is one on "Annavru":

http://www.viggy.com/english/current_annavru.asp

As far as details of cast & crew is considered, kannadamoviesinfo usually covers accurate details since it sources information directly from title card in most of the cases (though I am not sure whether it can be treated reliable as per wiki guidelines but information has high rate of accuracy). Here is one for "Annavru": https://kannadamoviesinfo.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/annavru-2003/

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.