This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 01:33, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

She was an unsuccessful candidate at the 2005 UK general election. According to the European Foundation website she isn't the editor of the European Journal. That leaves her only claim to notability the fact she is the daughter of her father. Sliggy 21:20, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

• Neglected to be explicit: delete. Sliggy 21:24, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to her father? If she's mentioned on his article it can't hurt... Shimgray 00:44, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or redirect per above. Dottore So 02:29, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, major party nominee for national legislature, as well as editor of a magazine. Meelar (talk) 14:37, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete she's not actually the editor according to the web site. I don't think we should have a page on every PPC of every party. Secretlondon 04:40, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - just another PPC. Timrollpickering 10:33, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete failed candidates unless something else makes them notable, which I don't think it does in this case. — Trilobite (Talk) 14:17, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, like the other PPCs. -R. fiend 14:30, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, only notable because of her father, scribbling for a right wing political publication not very notable unless the publication is very notable.--Gorgonzilla 17:40, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.