The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coren ^(talk) 02:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anti Jewish Arabism[edit]

Anti Jewish Arabism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Mass original synthesis and content forking, gross pov issues. Perception of Arabism is OR, on the verge of fringe Soman (talk) 17:01, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - While not denying that strands of Pan-Arabism may and/or do, to varying degrees, contain elements of anti-Semitism, this article effectively constitutes soapboxing (it would take a lot of work to rewrite it from a neutral point of view) and is undoubtedly original research: "infamous anti-Semitic 'protocols' libel", "Hitler's buddy", "just another Arab Muslim intolerance", "as part of a culture of hatred, the racism that denies historic roots of the Jews to Israel", etc. –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 19:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Question: doesn't this referenced "Masteringwiki" webpage, cited by the user, constitute meatpuppetry, as part of the User:MarthaFiles sockpupetry case? T L Miles (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per nom, and I would suggest IP checks for Little penguin 613. The point about meatpuppets is that posting on a another website a "how to" recreate verbatim versions of a deleted article is "teamwork", as in WP:TEAMWORK. T L Miles (talk) 00:32, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - may require a bit of cleanup, however it contain large amounts of reliable references to support it, including news agencies and organizations --Superflewis (talk) 08:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Pretty much a textbook example of original research by synthesis. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:56, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per WP:SOAP and WP:SYNTH. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the very citing the source for material [1] that was spread in the internet to anyone that can use it freely shows that the "sockpuppet" claim/s were/is false. As to the material itself it has all links and sources to provide how Nasser the almost fopunder of Arabism used Hitler as a model for his hatred so is Bathism's Arabism's bigotry.

Garlingos (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep While the article could use cleanup for quality reasons every claim is well sourced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Little penguin 613 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.