The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, discounting the last comment as rather unhelpful (see WP:ILIKEIT). Sandstein 06:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Antistatic (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Neutral bump up from contested speedy. A claim that it meets WP:MUSIC is on the article's talk page. Procedural nomination, so I abstain. Kchase T 04:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I placed the speedy since it did not appear to meet WP:MUSIC, but the author has clarified and the band seems to meet the criteria. --Walter Görlitz 06:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete The article/author asserts that they have performed nationwide, received independent coverage from multiple independent sources, and been placed on rotation by a major radio network. However, these have not been supported with a citation as of yet. Delete unless one of these can be supported with a reliable source. —ShadowHalo 12:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:V. Article does not provide reliable, third-party sources and I was unable to locate any. -- Satori Son 02:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I've added three sources now, which I believe to be reliable (they are from well-known Australian music websites). A-Thousand-Lies 15:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep - its a small article and it seems like the band will be GREAT someday68.6.66.11 07:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.