The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. This discussion was one of a large number of disruptive, retaliatory nominations of articles from PogingJuan (see WP:ANI#Disruptive editing/ Harassment by User:PogingJuan), made in such quick succession that they cannot have individually determined that there is a reason for deletion. If there are other editors in good standing that think this article should be deleted, please feel free to open a new discussion. – Joe (talk) 06:47, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aponi-vi, Arizona[edit]

Aponi-vi, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet WP:NGF. Subject lakcs WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth. Not an encyclopedic topic. ~PogingJuan 05:19, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - meets WP:GEOLAND. This appears to be a spate of retaliatory edits by this editor after they disagreed with an edit I made on one of the articles they created.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Here's the Google Maps view showing a butte: On what basis was this article created to say it "is a populated place"? The topo is labeled with "Po Ni Vi (site)" at this location, with no indication of it being a community. The National Gazetteer calls it a locale. I can't find any other results in Google Books or newspapers.com. The bulk keep votes on these nominations are not based on any evidence and should be ignored by the closing admin, just as the mass-creation of Arizona place names ignored any sources beyond the erroneous GNIS. Reywas92^Talk 17:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• delete I'm finding nothing on this, and I note that the oldest topo (which isn't that old) calls it "Po-Ni-Vi" and labels it a "site". Mangoe (talk) 00:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Topos show three "sites" along the ridge leading to Oraibi Butte but I can't find any coverage explaining what would have been there. Absent significant coverage or legal recognition, there's no basis for the claim that this meets GEOLAND or any of our notability standards. –dlthewave ☎ 05:00, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.