The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 04:00, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aquacrunk[edit]

Doesn't seem to be a notable genre. Only sources are three mentions in the Guardian which don't tell too much, and no other source at all seems to give this genre any mention. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non notable.Theseeker4 (talk) 21:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete': All the links in the article are trivial mentions. Schuym1 (talk) 22:12, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vote change to keep: per the Guardian article. Schuym1 (talk) 13:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Though I suspect this is a word Rustie made up on the spot to be amusing, the nature of the UK's fast-moving trend-sensitive music press has made it notable. The entire Guardian article is about the genre, as is much of Lisa Blanning's July 2008 The Wire article "Rustie". 86.44.21.224 (talk) 12:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We should probably just fashion an article on Rustie who seems to be increasingly notable as all get out, and just redirect for now. 86.44.21.224 (talk) 13:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per reliable references in the article -- Yaneleksklus (talk) 21:30, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This nonsense does not exist at all. Whomever created this garbage needs to stop making up music genres. Pandyu (talk) 02:25, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 06:02, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.