The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was moot. I'm re-opening and re-closing this discussion per WP:NACD following a challenge at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 April 2. The reasons for deletion (unverifiability) were valid and unaddressed at the time of the previous non-admin closure on 15 March 2022‎, and the AfD should have been properly been closed as "delete" at that time. However, these reasons for deletion have been addressed by a series of edits beginning on 4 April 2022‎, such that the article is no longer unsourced. The AfD discussion therefore no longer applies to the current state of the article, and accordingly I'm re-closing the AfD as moot. Sandstein 09:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arabian Gulf rugby sevens team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced throughout it's existence as an article - there doesn't seem much likelihood of sources appearing after more than a decade since it apparently existed. Unbh (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Unbh (talk) 09:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:40, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Side was a representable side in the World Rugby Sevens Series, although the team is defunct now. The article obviously needs lots of improving, but the side was a notable one under rugby union guidelines. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:41, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete with no prejudice as failing WP:V (which is a valid deletion reason). If somebody wants to bother restarting this from scratch with some actual encyclopedic information, and more importantly, with some source to back it up, then this is not going to be of much if any help, anyways (heck, this doesn't even say when or where exactly this side was active...) RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 01:24, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.