The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-02 08:40Z

Aras Corp[edit]

The entire article reads like an advertisement for Aras. Notability is very debatable. And, the author, InnovatorM seems to exhibit a conflict of interest. Hamitr 05:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This company is probably notable, but the article as it stands is insidious spam, which is very bad for Wikipedia. I'd recommend speedy deletion followed by re-creation as a neutral stub. --N Shar 05:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The references establish notability. Style and NPOV issues can be addressed without deleting the article. --Eastmain 05:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I was hoping for deletion of history, but if that's not going to happen I'll just go ahead and nuke the article back to the Stub Age. --N Shar 05:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It should be less spammy now.--N Shar 06:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I haven't looked at the earlier versions but the current text is a neutral report, not an advertisement. JamesMLane t c 06:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The awards support notability, as do some stories about it, like this Wall Street Journal one [1] --Oakshade 18:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.