The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Aravind Mangalashery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable person written by the subject himself. Written in highly unencyclopaedic tone. + has no sources at all that cite that he even exists! VarunFEB2003 08:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources about Aravind Mangalashery, or his company/achievements, so it probably fails WP:GNG and WP:NPERSON. Between the complete lack of sources for a BLP and the résumé-like style, it should be deleted. Sunmist (talk) 04:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not linked in and people should not create their own articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:52, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Totally unnotable person; definitely fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 07:11, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.