The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep, nominator appears to have selected 5-6 random Guantanamo detainees to try and delete, copy/pasting his nomination for each of them. Third-Party sources seem to exist for all of them, and no attempt is being made to improve or expand the articles, instead just jumping straight to deletion. AfD is not the proper route to ensure an article is fixed up - though it sometimes has that effect. This article needs work, yes - but it is about a notable individual andadequately sourced with reliable footnotes. Sherurcij(speaker for the dead) 17:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I think this is a misunderstanding of the one event criteria. Guantanamo detainees are notable. Being one that was 12 to 15 years old makes this even more notable. It is easy to find other sources. Kingturtle (talk) 22:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable as a victim and as someone accused of being a terrorist or at least an enemy. Sources are adequate. I hope this group of nominations is not based on POV. ` DGG ( talk ) 03:30, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.