The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Dhaka. Nakon 20:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ashkona[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NPLACE or WP:GNG, but perhaps it's clearer with access to Asian languages? Creator was banned for creating 'nonsense articles.' This has been tagged for notability for six and a half years, so time for a discussion. I could find no good merge or redirect target. Boleyn (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- as confirmed by following the geo-coordinates: a non-notable neighborhood or development in Dhaka. —Noah 23:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 10:26, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam ^Sing! 01:41, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – nafSadh did say 21:58, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete does not meet WP:NPLACE. LibStar (talk) 04:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NPLACE.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:31, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This is unquestionably a neighborhood of Dhaka LINK, so there should be no worries about a hoax. I leave it to others to determine whether this meets Keep criteria for an inhabited place. I found the number of Google hits impressive. Carrite (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Dhaka without prejudice to future recreation should sources emerge is the smart play, I think. Carrite (talk) 13:33, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.