The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:58, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ashley Prange[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet NGOLF or GNG John from Idegon (talk) 06:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 06:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 06:57, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep She has won two professional golf tournaments. She clearly passes NGOLF....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment - her wins were in what is essentially minor league golf, not on the LPGA. That does not meet NGOLF. Unless someone can make a GNG arguement, she is not notable. John from Idegon (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article could use expansion + additional references, not deletion per WP: ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete Does not appear to pass WP:NGOLF, but is also slightly more notable for winning the TV show. Delta13C (talk) 16:08, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:13, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' fails notability requirements for golfers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:54, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment To follow-up on my previous comment, these sources reinforce the subject's notability: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. There's more. Article needs expansion, not deletion. Hmlarson (talk) 21:18, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject passes WP:BASIC. Source examples include, but are not limited to: ^[1], ^[2], ^[3], ^[4], ^[5], ^[6], ^[7], ^[8], ^[9], ^[10]. WP:NGOLF is a guideline to determine if Golfers are presumed notable, which the subject does not appear to meet. However, the subject does pass WP:BASIC. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Prange Still On Move After `Big Break'". Hartford Courant.
^ "Prange's short game gets a break". Herald & Review.
^ "Noblesville native Prange out to conquer Lost Marsh again". nwitimes.com.
^ "Big Break Player Wins Futures Tour Event". (subscription required)
^ "Prange gets a break". (subscription required)
^ "Now or never for Prange". (subscription required)
^ Mistake-Free Golf. p. 28.
^ "Big Break player Prange wins Futures Tour event". USA Today.
^ "JU hires 'Big Break' winner as women's golf coach". The Florida Times-Union.
^ "Golfers catch 'Break' on TV". The Daytona Beach News-Journal. (view both pages)

Comment I think GNG is always such a judgment call when it comes to athletes and I'm not sure which way it goes here. I am curious about whether an NCAA First Team All-American selection would meet WP:NCOLLATH. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination/now voting keep - The reference above from the Jacksonville paper on her being named as women's head golf coach at Jacksonville University does elevate her to an automatic notability standard, altho I cannot recall which one. College head coaches are notable, period. John from Idegon (talk) 08:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.